Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПроОтходы63

Channel

ПроОтходы63

@ProOthody63

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

632subscribers

+42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003633875086
TypeChannel
Username@ProOthody63
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ProOthody63

Growth

5906326116 August 2026 — 590 subscribers6 August 2026 — 590 subscribers14 August 2026 — 623 subscribers21 August 2026 — 626 subscribers27 August 2026 — 629 subscribers4 September 2026 — 632 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 584–638 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 12:38632+3
27 Aug 2026, 19:46629+3
21 Aug 2026, 04:03626+3
14 Aug 2026, 21:24623+33
6 Aug 2026, 18:01590no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:52590first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 6 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬2122.3%
🤯1414.9%
💯1212.8%
🔥1212.8%
👏1111.7%
🤣88.51%
💩44.26%
33.19%
🏆22.13%
👍22.13%
💅22.13%
11.06%
👎11.06%
🥴11.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈5,850 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

(нам пишут) Кинель-Черкасский район, с.п. Тимашево: несанкционированная свалка на окраине села Мусор складируют в овраге, потом жгут и засыпают землей. Администрация публично обвиняет жителей. Жители же наоборот, считают, что пример незаконных действий подает сама администрация, регулярно свозя на эту территорию растительный и другой мусор. Год назад Росприроднадзор уже проводил проверку и подтвердил факт организа

🔥4🤬3🤯3👎1💩1🥴1

5 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈7,520 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Уже больше суток жду ответ от АО «Экология» по завалам отходов в Нефтегорске Нефтяников, 44 – фото от 3 августа Нефтяников, 52 – фото от 5 августа Где перерасчет, уважаемый региональный оператор? Где соблюдение СанПиН, где акты о невывозе отходов, уважаемая администрация? Баландин Александр Викторович, вы там как, бдите?

🤬7💩3🤯3

5 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈7,530 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ситуация с заглубленными контейнерами не меняется Несмотря на заявления ответственных, накопители заглубленного типа сломаны или в них не меняются мешки. Каждый день приходят жалобы от жителей, где видно, что мусора "под завязку". Все фотографии от 5 августа Красноглинский район: Крутые ключи, 17 Крутые ключи, 12 Золотухина 30 Мира 16/1 Южный город: Николаевский проспект, 15 Николаевский проспект, 44 Николаевский

🤬7🤯3🏆2💅21

5 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈8,050 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Южное кладбище: мусор вывезли после жалобы губернатору Прислать жалобу, поделиться наблюдениями и мнениями можно анонимно: в личные сообщения канала "ПроОтходы63" или публично в чат канала Больше интересных инсайдов и аналитики, подписывайтесь ⬇️⬇️⬇️: ТГ ПроОтходы63 https://t.me/ProOthody63 ВК ПроОтходы63 https://vk.com/proothody63

👏43🔥3👍2

5 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC≈8,390 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Подарите Живайкину калькулятор Стараюсь не вступать в говно в политические темы, но тут особый случай. Суперпроект Александра Живайкина «Экопатриот». Звучит так, будто депутат одной левой спасает экологию, а правой – обеспечивает фронт. Но давайте просто посчитаем цифры, потому что цифры, в отличие от кандидатов и политтехнологов, не врут. ➡️Единая Россия гордо отчиталась, что по проекту на 17 июля собрали 10 тонн

💯12👏7🤯5

4 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC≈8,770 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🛑 #НиКоняНиВоза: новости по КПО Тольятти Подвижек в переработке и строительстве объектов ТКО в Самарской области как не было, так и нет. История со скандальным КПО «Тольятти» окончательно опошлилась. Самарская межрайонная природоохранная прокуратура проверила возможные нарушения при планировании строительства КПО «Тольятти». И вы не поверите! Прокуроры установили, что назначенное областным правительством ГАУ СО «Т

🤣8🔥5🤬4

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @ProOthody63. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПроОтходы63” (@ProOthody63), 632 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProOthody63.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.