12 measurements spanning 33 days, net -56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,591–8,671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 02:56
8,600
-10
3 Sept 2026, 09:46
8,610
-14
31 Aug 2026, 07:37
8,624
-9
28 Aug 2026, 11:34
8,633
-16
25 Aug 2026, 06:22
8,649
-1
19 Aug 2026, 13:04
8,650
-12
16 Aug 2026, 05:56
8,662
+9
12 Aug 2026, 21:58
8,653
-4
10 Aug 2026, 06:48
8,657
+6
7 Aug 2026, 16:10
8,651
-5
7 Aug 2026, 00:45
8,656
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:39
8,656
first reading
Engagement
61 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.93%
avg views ÷ 8,600 subscribers
Avg views / post
854
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 61 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
61 (30 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
32,437
Reactions total
789
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,302 reactions across 61 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
454
34.9%
👍
133
10.2%
🔥
63
4.84%
🙏
62
4.76%
❤🔥
55
4.22%
🕊
51
3.92%
😎
40
3.07%
👌
37
2.84%
😱
37
2.84%
🫡
36
2.76%
🤗
29
2.23%
💘
28
2.15%
😘
27
2.07%
🤝
25
1.92%
😍
23
1.77%
🥰
22
1.69%
🎉
21
1.61%
💯
21
1.61%
👨💻
20
1.54%
custom 5334523697174683404
18
1.38%
8 further kinds
100
7.68%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,302 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
135
across the posts below
Posts paid on
60
of 61 we hold a reading for · 98%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ProTrader_365. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 61 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Less than 15 minutes until Fed Chair Warsh speaks — expect volatility across Gold, Bitcoin and the US Dollar.
Scenarios:
• Mildly Hawkish → USD ↑ | Gold ↓ | BTC ↓ initially
• Strong Hawkish → USD ↑↑ | Gold ↓↓ | BTC ↓↓
• Dovish Surprise → USD ↓ | Gold ↑ | BTC ↑
Important: Chicago PMI, University of Michigan Sentiment and potentially payroll revisions are also due around the same time.
So the first move may not b…
💰Gold Position Update — Back in Near the Lows
I opened another Gold LONG position near the recent lows, while keeping proper risk management in place.
As long as my overall analysis remains valid, I will continue to trade only in the direction of my personal setup — and for now, that direction remains LONG.
The good news is that the position is already risk-free, so now we can patiently watch the next key move.
T…
💰Gold Trade Update — What Happened to Yesterday’s Position?
Yesterday’s Gold position was eventually closed by the Trailing Stop, allowing us to protect the trade as market conditions changed.
However, the overall Gold analysis remains valid, and I have already opened my next LONG position from the Potential Reversal Zone (PRZ).
Now, attention turns to the next major catalyst: Fed Chair Kevin Warsh speaks in less …
Gold Position💰
🟢My Long position☝️
📊Base on above analysis.
My Gold position is still open.
Let’s see how it plays out in the end — will it reach a $27,000 profit, or at least turn into a risk-free trade?
#GOLD #XAUUSD #signal
────────────────
🚀ProTrader_365
🟡Bitcoin update
🟢My Long position☝️
📊Base on above analysis.
🙏So, please:
‼️Grow your capital step by step
‼️Avoid overconfidence
‼️Always stay in control
#BTCUSDT #Bitcoin #Signal
────────────────
🚀ProTrader_365
🟡Gold update💰
Gold(XAUUSD) has successfully held the Potential Reversal Zone (PRZ), so the bullish scenario remains valid.
Although price action became a bit challenging and the internal wave structure of the Bullish Flag turned more complex, the overall setup is still intact.
On the latest 4-hour timeframe, Gold also appears to be forming a Bullish Hammer, which could become an important signal that the correctio…
🟡Bitcoin update🪙
✅Full Target Done✅
😎In this analysis, we were able to find the exact price floor for Bitcoin(BTCUSDT).
📈Chart by: TradingView
#Crypto #Bitcoin #BTCUSDT #BTCUSD
────────────────
🚀ProTrader_365
🔇UNMUTE the Protrader365 Telegram channel to use the latest analyzes and free signals.
🎁I hope you support the posts on 📈TradingView📈 so that I can share with you the short-term analysis that is like a FREE signal every day.
😒Some followers send messages saying that they did not see the analysis because they muted the channel, I hope the analysis and signals were useful for you. (That's why I said to remind you for…
Gold Builds a Bullish Flag: Is $4,720 the Next Target?
🕐Time Frame: 4-hour time frame
📊Status: Long
Gold(XAUUSD) has continued its bullish trend after successfully breaking above the Descending Channel and the 200_SMA(Daily).
The price is now starting another bullish move from the Potential Reversal Zone(PRZ), while a Bullish Flag Pattern appears to be forming.
Can gold confirm another breakout and extend its ra…
Bitcoin Rejected Again — Can Bulls Reclaim $80K?
🕐Time Frame: 1-hour time frame
📊Status: Long/Short
Bitcoin(BTCUSDT) made another attempt to break above the Heavy Resistance Zone, but the breakout appears to have failed, triggering another correction.
BTC is now trading near the Cumulative Long Liquidation Leverage and the key trading level of $77,350.
Can Bitcoin rebound from this area and challenge $80,000 aga…
🟡Gold update
🔴My Short position☝️
📊Base on above analysis.
🙏So, please:
‼️Grow your capital step by step
‼️Avoid overconfidence
‼️Always stay in control
#XAUUSD #Gold #Signal
────────────────
🚀ProTrader_365
🟡Gold update💰
✅Target Done(Risk-To-Reward: 0.69)✅
Gold(XAUUSD) has now reached $4,605.4, completing our managed short setup.
Managing the position carefully around the release of the key US economic data helped us avoid the sharp price noise that could have triggered our Stop Loss before the move continued in our favor.
With bearish momentum now weakening, I have decided to close the short position and secure th…
❤🔥6❤3🕊2👍1😘1
Signed Admin_ProTrader365
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @ProTrader_365. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🌸AnabelSignals🌸 Best Free Forex & Gold Signals @anabelsignals · 31,916 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals) @VasilyTrading · 42,563 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
TopTradingSignals(Best Forex & Gold Signals) @top_tradingsignals · 32,673 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
Gold Trader Alliance 🔔 @BrianTradingForex · 46,372 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
MERTER ZORLU ANALİZ @MERTERZORLU · 33,428 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ProTrader365” (@ProTrader_365), 8,600 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProTrader_365.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.