Channel
@ProductLounge
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
114subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002025516692 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProductLounge |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProductLounge |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 114 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 113 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 113 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
32 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 37.5% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 12.5% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ProductLounge. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 January 2026 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Стратегическое планирование продуктов На схеме – процесс разработки продуктовой стратегии. (Схему в формате PDF прикладываю в комментариях). Главная мысль, которую я хочу донести этой схемой: есть три разных контекста, которые собираются и анализируются своими инструментами, и которые используются для дальнейшего принятия решений. И все три контекста неразрывно связаны между собой, иначе есть риск создать никому н…
👍2🔥1
Про мобильную суверенность ❓ Пока гулял с собакой, мне в голову пришёл вопрос: а почему мы – Россия – строим IT-суверенитет на чужой технологической платформе? Сначала мы создаём национальный мессенджер, заводим туда госуслуги и банки, безальтернативно продвигаем его населению, блокируя попутно всех конкурентов и получаем… выпиливание национального мессенджера из AppStore. А что мы слышим от чиновников? «Все на Анд…
🔥2
Про стратегическое мышление Таким как я сейчас трудно найти работу, потому что история про продуктовый менеджмент – это история про развитие и рост. Новые продукты, рынки, сегменты, стратегии, сценарии будущего – это всё работает, когда это самое будущее кого-то интересует. Когда делаются ставки и надо, чтобы эти ставки сработали. Т.е. эта история гармонично воспринимается на растущем рынке. А сейчас время стагнаци…
❤1
Продуктовые метрики – коротко о важном На базе материала Product Lab. Продуктовые метрики бывают: ⚪ Качественные и количественные: первые отвечают за восприятие и эмоции, вторые – за измеримые действия. ⚪ Опережающие и запаздывающие: одни помогают прогнозировать, другие – подводить итоги. ⚪ Экономические и операционные: финансовые показатели, пульс продукта, показатели конкретного шага в воронке. Но для эффективно…
«Если вам не стыдно за первую версию вашего продукта, значит, вы выпустили его слишком поздно» - Рид Хоффман, LinkedIn. #Размышления @ProductLounge
Насколько, говорите, Сбер сократил штат ИТ? 😁 #Наблюдение @ProductLounge
😢1
Беспощадный тюнинг! #МирВокруг @ProductLounge
🔥1😁1
- Ты в какой компании работаешь? - В БухЛо! - А, ну всё понятно.) - Нет, ничего не понятно! Мы бухгалтерию аутсорсим и юристов! - Окей, окей! )) Под градусом?))) @ProductLounge
😁3
С Днём Победы!
❤1
Product Market Hit vs Product Market Fit В чём отличие между Product Market Hit и Product Market Fit? Проблема в том, что термин Product Market Hit (PMH) не является стандартным в академическом или венчурном лексиконе, в отличие от Product Market Fit (PMF). Его используют скорее как «разговорный» или маркетинговый. Тем не менее, мне кажется важным и полезным ввести термин Product Market Hit в лексикон продуктовой к…
Расфокусировка Одна из самых больших и дорогих ошибок в продакт менеджменте – это распыление фокуса внимания. Распыление фокуса инвестиции, фокуса продукта, фокуса проблемы, фокуса аудитории… 🤍 Помните, существовал такой бренд – 🤩 Marussia Motors? (вроде как произносится «Мараша», но мне ближе «Маруся») Это был крутой автомобильный стартап, который предлагал относительно дешевый спорт-кар, при этом – в офигенном ди…
👍3
Метрики ради метрик Недавно я столкнулся с любопытным кейсом: в одном продукте появилась метрика, отслеживающая количество запятых в пользовательских запросах. Зачем? Ответ обескураживает: просто потому, что это технически возможно. Никакого бизнес смысла, никакой продуктовой гипотезы – чистая демонстрация возможностей аналитики. Этот пример – крайность, но он хорошо иллюстрирует проблему, с которой сталкиваются мн…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ProductLounge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Курилка продакта” (@ProductLounge), 114 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProductLounge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.