Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آموزش جامع مدیریت محصول

Channel

آموزش جامع مدیریت محصول

@ProductManagementCourses

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,988subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001808375150
TypeChannel
Username@ProductManagementCourses
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ProductManagementCourses

Growth

1,9701,9881,97922 August 2026 — 1,971 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,970 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,973 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,980 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,984 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,988 subscribers22 August 20266 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 14 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,967–1,991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 00:591,988+4
1 Sept 2026, 11:451,984+4
29 Aug 2026, 04:251,980+7
26 Aug 2026, 05:271,973+3
23 Aug 2026, 15:521,970-1
22 Aug 2026, 17:461,971first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 1,988 subscribers
Avg views / post
363
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.591%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total4,355
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 13s
Average length
2m 13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2882.4%
👍411.8%
👌25.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC95 viewsread 22 August 2026

سلام به همه و ممنونم از عزیزانی که در این نظر سنجی شرکت کردند. 🌺🌺🌺🌺

19 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC232 viewsread 22 August 2026

🧠 چطور یک محصول را برای عامل‌های هوش مصنوعی طراحی کنیم؟ 6 عنصر کلیدی برای طراحی محصول در عصر Agentic AI در عصر هوش مصنوعی، دیگر کافی نیست محصول فقط برای انسان قابل‌استفاده باشد؛ محصول باید برای عامل هوش مصنوعی هم قابل‌فهم، قابل‌اجرا و قابل‌یادگیری باشد. اینجاست که مفهوم جدیدی در کنار UX مطرح می‌شود: AIX — AI Experience یعنی طراحی محصول به‌گونه‌ای که عامل هوش مصنوعی بتواند آن را بفهمد و در آن اقدام کند. اما یک محصول

19 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC341 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🧠 چطور یک محصول را برای عامل‌های هوش مصنوعی طراحی کنیم؟ کانال آموزش جامع مدیریت محصول @ProductManagementCourses

2

18 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC422 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

#Insight 🎯 ۳ حلقه حیاتی در تحویل ارزش؛ زنجیره تحویل ارزش (Value Delivery Chain) ساختن یک ویژگی فنی بی‌نقص یا یک ایده انقلابی، به‌تنهایی ارزش ایجاد نمی‌کند. برای اینکه کاربر واقعاً از محصول شما ارزش دریافت کند، ۳ حلقه متوالی باید در کنار یکدیگر درست کار کنند. اگر حتی یکی از این حلقه‌ها دچار اختلال شود، ممکن است تمام زمان، هزینه و تلاش تیم محصول و مهندسی به نتیجه مطلوب نرسد. 📌 زنجیره تحویل ارزش (Value Delivery Chain

2

17 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTCviews —

آموزش جامع مدیریت محصول pinned «سلام دوستان، امیدوارم حالتون خوب باشه 🌺 به انتشار مطالب و موضوعات عمومی در حوزه مدیریت و کسب‌وکار علاقه‌مند هستید؟ اگر استقبال کنید، می‌تونیم این نوع محتواها رو هم به‌صورت مستمر منتشر کنیم.»

16 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC345 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Poll

سلام دوستان، امیدوارم حالتون خوب باشه 🌺 به انتشار مطالب و موضوعات عمومی در حوزه مدیریت و کسب‌وکار علاقه‌مند هستید؟ اگر استقبال کنید، می‌تونیم این نوع محتواها رو هم به‌صورت مستمر منتشر کنیم.

  1. بله70%
  2. خیر4%
  3. در کانال مجزا مدیریتی صرفا منتشر بشه بهتره.32%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4

16 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC258 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo

کتاب «چرا می‌خواهیم شما ثروتمند باشید» 📚📚📚

16 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC326 viewsread 22 August 2026

«استقلال مالی کمتر به این مربوط است که چقدر بیشتر پول درمی‌آوری و بیشتر به این مربوط است که کمتر از درآمدت خرج کنی.» ۷ درس از کتاب «چرا می‌خواهیم شما ثروتمند باشید» 📚📚📚 دو مرد، یک پیام نوشته‌ی دونالد جی. ترامپ و رابرت تی. کیوساکی ۱. اهمیت آموزش مالی هر دو نویسنده تأکید می‌کنند که سواد مالی برای رسیدن به ثروت ضروری است. درک مدیریت پول، سرمایه‌گذاری و اصول مالی به افراد کمک می‌کند تصمیم‌های آگاهانه‌تری بگیرند. ۲. ت

15 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC320 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026

⚖️ چگونه تصمیم‌های غیرمحبوب اما درست بگیریم تصمیم‌های درست به‌ندرت مورد پسند همه قرار می‌گیرند؛ به‌ویژه در کسب‌وکار. غیرمحبوب بودن، لزوماً نشانه اشتباه نیست؛ بلکه اغلب نشانه مسئولیت‌پذیری است. چنین تصمیم‌هایی زمانی گرفته می‌شوند که: لازم است بخشی از کسب‌وکار که کارکنان آن را دوست دارند، کوچک یا متوقف شود. باید از مشتری‌ای با گردش مالی بالا اما بدون سود 💸 صرف‌نظر کرد. لازم است قوانین و رویه‌های داخل تیم تغییر کند. مع

👌2👍1

10 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC573 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
File

قسمت: 6 عنوان: کاربر ما کیست؟ #مبانی_تفکرطراحی #AIPodcast #پادکست_آموزشی کانال آموزش جامع مدیریت محصول @ProductManagementCourses

👍21

10 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC569 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🎯 خطر هارمونی ساختگی در نقشه همدلی: چرا تضادهای رفتاری کاربر، کلید طلایی شناخت اوست؟ 🤔 ✅ یکی از اشتباهات رایج در درک نیازهای مشتریان، تلاش برای بیش از حد هماهنگ و بدون تناقض نشان دادن نقشه همدلی (Empathy Map) کاربر است. به این خطای استراتژیک، نادیده گرفتن تنش‌های رفتاری (Tension) در تحلیل پرسونای مخاطب می‌گویند. 📌 تحلیل عمیق رفتار کاربر بر اساس متدولوژی تفکر طراحی یعنی: دسته‌بندی مفاهیم مشابه (Bucketing): انتقال ی

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ProductManagementCourses. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTCAnonymous Poll56 voters

سلام دوستان، امیدوارم حالتون خوب باشه 🌺 به انتشار مطالب و موضوعات عمومی در حوزه مدیریت و کسب‌وکار علاقه‌مند هستید؟ اگر استقبال کنید، می‌تونیم این نوع محتواها رو هم به‌صورت مستمر منتشر کنیم.

  1. بله70%
  2. خیر4%
  3. در کانال مجزا مدیریتی صرفا منتشر بشه بهتره.32%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آموزش جامع مدیریت محصول” (@ProductManagementCourses), 1,988 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProductManagementCourses.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.