Channel
ProfessionalCMA
@ProfessionalCma
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,386subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001329091415 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProfessionalCma |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProfessionalCma |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:07 | 2,386 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:38 | 2,387 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:55 | 2,386 | +2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:18 | 2,384 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:45 | 2,385 | +4 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 20:05 | 2,381 | +1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:02 | 2,380 | +3 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 2,377 | +2 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:07 | 2,375 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 2,375 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 2,374 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 2,376 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 2,374 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 2,373 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fresherslive_govt_jobs · 23,421
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 17 September 2026
@cagurujii · 28,950
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
@camonk8 · 27,221
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
@new_AmeerAlborihi_library · 94,141
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ProfessionalCMA” (@ProfessionalCma), 2,386 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProfessionalCma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.