Channel
@Prophecy_Calls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
110subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002133052866 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Prophecy_Calls |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Prophecy_Calls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 110 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 112 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 113 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 113 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ROBINHOOD CHAIN 🟣🪶 gamble play: Plays on NVIDIA—the face of the AI boom—and fits Robinhood Chain’s stock-themed narrative, making it a simple and recognizable meme. Token name: NVIDIA Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x04672f19fa620814934c4c3bfd99ceb924f51513b63303270ddcdc493f94445d Ca: 0xff90BE1aD2025d0A08fb4cA6E3AC4229C83d9C37 MC: 25K The Bot I use: https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_Crypt0Prophecy DYOR/NFA
It's called Stable chain and you can use this bot to trade and bridge https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_Crypt0Prophecy
New Chain just dropped and first meme coin went from 20k to 13m. Will start Hunting on it as well.
60k
ROBINHOOD CHAIN 🟣🪶 gamble play: Token name: ping bot Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xde6ecc1693f7fbb071ae4b70dbbb0f956c0f51ce Ca: 0x6AE20Af13fc66ADCD130eC9fb11BF210e3d9EC4C MC: 35K Socials: https://pingbot.trade/ https://pingbot.trade/docs https://x.com/pingbotRH The Bot I use: https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_Crypt0Prophecy DYOR/NFA
Still holding this, the price haven't change
More than 2x on this
ROBINHOOD CHAIN 🟣🪶 gamble play: Token name: CELEBI FUND Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x375c5310cb45c6b4d14ff58b7f6e5a2fedc0e414 Ca: 0x375c5310cb45C6B4D14Ff58b7F6e5A2fEdc0E414 MC: 18K Socials: https://celebi.fund https://x.com/celebi_fund https://t.me/celebifund The Bot I use: https://t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_Crypt0Prophecy DYOR/NFA
Missed a fucking 20x in front of my eyes FUCKKK. Robinhood is on Fire thooo
Don't buy he got hacked
2x
🐳1
Just seen, this guy launched on pons Trump and Eric trump follow him on x. I put some $ in let’s see where this journey goes. https://x.com/OJoelsen/status/2079672147149037945
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Prophecy_Calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Prophecy” (@Prophecy_Calls), 110 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Prophecy_Calls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.