Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for روانكاوی

Channel

روانكاوی

@Psychoanalysis_Philosophy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

5,940subscribers

-56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001331599382
TypeChannel
Username@Psychoanalysis_Philosophy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Psychoanalysis_Philosophy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,9405,9965,9686 August 2026 — 5,996 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,994 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,989 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,985 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,991 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,981 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,973 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,970 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,965 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,963 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,964 subscribers29 September 2026 — 5,963 subscribers6 October 2026 — 5,955 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,950 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,945 subscribers21 October 2026 — 5,947 subscribers24 October 2026 — 5,943 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,940 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,943 subscribers5 November 2026 — 5,940 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
20 measurements spanning 92 days, net -56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,932–6,004 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 20:595,940-3
31 Oct 2026, 07:545,943+3
28 Oct 2026, 00:485,940-3
24 Oct 2026, 22:485,943-4
21 Oct 2026, 15:195,947+2
18 Oct 2026, 03:085,945-5
12 Oct 2026, 20:205,950-5
6 Oct 2026, 09:565,955-8
29 Sept 2026, 18:185,963-1
19 Sept 2026, 11:555,964+1
12 Sept 2026, 02:215,963-2
7 Sept 2026, 18:185,965-5
2 Sept 2026, 20:545,970-3
24 Aug 2026, 22:385,973-8
18 Aug 2026, 08:485,981-10
15 Aug 2026, 13:145,991+6
12 Aug 2026, 09:065,985-4
9 Aug 2026, 14:115,989-5
6 Aug 2026, 18:005,994-2
6 Aug 2026, 08:455,996first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 18 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 5,940 subscribers
Avg views / post
737
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.746%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026
Posts held21 (18 June 2025 – 15 October 2026)
Views total1,474
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 02:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

306 reactions across 21 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤16955.2%
👍8527.8%
👎185.88%
👏92.94%
🙏92.94%
👌61.96%
😡61.96%
😢20.654%
✍10.327%
😱10.327%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 306 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2025 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (100.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Oct 2026, 11:39 UTC768 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026

“We’re not his disciples,” he says, “because that’s not possible. But we are his successors without doubt. Most of all, we’re his collaborators.” ما مریدان او نیستیم؛ چون چنین چیزی ممکن نیست. اما بی‌تردید جانشینان او هستیم. و بیش از هر چیز، همکاران او هستیم استفاده نویسنده از این عبارت در عنوان مقاله جالب توجه است گراس‌مارک می‌گوید این جمله، با وجود احترام عمیق به چشم‌انداز و نبوغ گائودی، ظرفیت خلاقانه‌ای برای ادام…

❤5👍1

15 Oct 2026, 11:39 UTC706 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026

هفتهٔ ی گذشته، در ادامهٔ بحث‌های دورهٔ جامع روانکاوی سلف سایکولوژی، صحبت به انقلابی‌بودن آرا و نظریات کوهوت رسید. دربارهٔ اینکه آیا آرای یک نظریه‌پرداز را می‌توان انقلابی دانست یا نه و‌چه مختصاتی برای این داوری باید در نظر داشت همواره بحث‌هایی وجود داشته است؛ به‌ویژه وقتی پای نسبت یک نظریه با سنت های پیش از خود و میزان گسست آن از نظریه‌های پیشین به میان می‌آید. برای مثال، دست‌کم در سال‌های آغازین شکل‌گیری جنبش رابطه…

❤5

30 Apr 2026, 19:28 UTC≈3,250 views30 reactionsread 5 November 2026

به گمانِ من، نظریه‌های روان‌کاوی در بابِ چگونگیِ رشد و کارکردِ ذهن، دربارهٔ آیندهٔ جانداری که آن را «انسان» می‌نامیم، حرف‌هایی برای گفتن دارند.یکی از یافته‌های نظریهٔ روان‌کاوی این است که انسان‌ها، فارغ از زن یا مرد بودن، از مثله‌کردن و کشتارِ هم‌نوعانِ خود لذت می‌برند. نه دین است که آدمیان را به کشتارِ یکدیگر وامی‌دارد و نه ایدئولوژی‌های سیاسی. انسان‌ها ایدئولوژی‌ها را چه مذهبی باشند چه غیرمذهبی صرفاً دستاویزی می‌ک…

❤14👍10👎5🙏1

31 Dec 2025, 08:32 UTC≈3,370 views44 reactionsread 5 November 2026

اوایل دههٔ چهل، زمانی که هنوز مرحوم بهرام بیضائی نام پررنگی پیدا نکرده و جوانی است در آستانهٔ شدن، بررسی و نقدی می‌نویسد بر آثار ابراهیم گلستان؛ گلستانی که در آن سال‌ها چهره‌ای تثبیت‌شده و نسبتاً پرآوازه به شمار می‌آید. داوری‌های محتوایی و هنری ـ سینمایی این نوشته هرچه باشد، موضوع این یادداشت نیست. آن‌چه قصد دارم از دل آن نوشته برکشم، جمله‌ای است که بیضائی در پایان یکی از نوشته‌هایش دربارهٔ مستند «موج و مرجان و خارا»…

👍35❤5👎4

31 Dec 2025, 08:31 UTC≈3,000 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😡6✍1❤1👎1😢1

3 Nov 2025, 11:56 UTC≈3,260 views19 reactionsread 5 November 2026

فرانسیس بیکن قرن‌ها پیش اشاره کرد که وقتی افراد دلبسته ی ایده یا مفهومی خاص می‌شوند، ذهنشان دیگر پذیرای اندیشه های جدید نخواهد بود. آن‌ها همچنان در پی شواهدی، هرچند سست و بی‌اساس، برای تقویت باورهای پیشین خود خواهند بود و هر نشانه ای را که با آن باورها مغایرت داشته باشد،نادیده می گیرند ایده بیکن تا حد زیادی معتبر است. این قانون در مورد همگان، در تمام عرصه‌های فعالیت بشر، از جمله روانکاوی، صدق می‌کند. در نگاه نخست،…

❤7👌6👍3👎3

29 Oct 2025, 19:57 UTC≈2,610 views12 reactionsread 5 November 2026

روایت مایکل ایگن از دیدار با آندره گرین و ویلفرد بیون گویا ایگن زمزمه می کند: یك نفس با ما نشستي خانه بوي گُل گرفت خانه ات آباد كين ويرانه بوي گُل گرفت آیگن توضیح می‌دهد که این [تجربه] صرفاً یک اتفاق گذرا و آنی نبود، بلکه زندگی [او] را عمیقاً تحت تأثیر قرار داد. «دیدارم با آندره گرین نیز بر من تأثیر گذاشت. تجربه‌ی شگفت‌انگیزی بود. اما مانند [تجربه‌ام] با بیون نبود؛ آن طنین آشنای «حقیقت، حقیقت» در آن نبود.…

❤8👏4

12 Oct 2025, 18:48 UTC≈2,610 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @psychodynamic_psychiatryFile

به نرمی پای در آن شبِ نیکو مگذار، بگذار پیری‌ات شعله برکشد و غُرّان شود در واپسین دمِ روز؛ خروشان شو! خروشان شو بر خاموشیِ نور... ‌ به مناسبت ۸ اکتبر (١۶ مهر)، بخشی خواندنی و تأثربرانگیز از روایت چارلز استرویزر را مرور می‌کنیم: تصویری از آخرین حضور کوهوت در کنفرانس روان‌شناسی «خود» و روزهای پیش از مرگ او. ترجمه‌ی مهدی قاسم‌زاده 🔉 کانال تلگرامی روان‌پزشکی پویایی‌شناختی 🌄 صفحه‌ی اینستاگرامی روان‌پزشکی پویایی‌شناختی

❤3🙏1

12 Oct 2025, 18:48 UTC≈2,610 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @psychodynamic_psychiatryPhoto

هشتم اکتبر (١۶ مهر) سالروز درگذشت هاینز کوهوت است. چه او را آن‌گونه ببینیم که برخی از علاقه‌مندان‌اش می‌نگرند و جریان فکری روان‌کاوی در سال‌های اخیر را ثمره‌ی اندیشه‌های او بدانیم، و چه آن‌گونه که برخی مخالفان‌اش می‌گویند و افکارش را در کنار گذاشته شدن آن نوع روان‌کاوی‌ای که منتقدان «عمیق» می‌خوانند بپذیریم، در هر صورت، نمی‌توان در نقش جریان‌ساز او در تفکر روان‌کاوانه‌ی معاصر تردید کرد. به مناسبت ۸ اکتبر، بخشی خوان…

❤5

7 Jul 2025, 12:12 UTC≈3,290 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @mkazemkazemi

✳️ صحنه‌های پاک‌نشدنی 🔸محمدکاظم کاظمی 🔻خداوند از او درگذرد. نام «کریم غول» در اوایل دههٔ هفتاد لرزه بر تن مهاجرین افغانستان در مشهد می‌انداخت، مأمور خشن و بی‌رحم «افغانی‌بگیر». سپس او در روزهایی که گرفتار سرطان شد، بسیار از مهاجرین حلالیت طلبید. سرطان او را برد اما نام او در تاریخ مناسبات دو کشور ماند. مأمور از قهار عاصی شاعر توانای افغانستان که در دههٔ هفتاد به ایران سفر کرده بود، پاسپورت طلب کرد. عاصی پاسپورتش را…

❤17👎5👍3👏1😢1😱1

1 Jul 2025, 11:23 UTC≈2,990 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026

پریمو لِوی، علاوه بر خاطرات مشهورش با عنوان :اگر این نیز یک انسان است که در آن تجربه‌ی خود در آشویتس را روایت می‌کند، کتابی دیگر نیز به نام آتش‌بس نوشته است. این کتاب، داستان سفر طولانی او را از لحظه آزادی از اردوگاه کار اجباری تا بازگشت به خانه‌اش در ایتالیا بازگو می‌کند. لِوی در این اثر، از همراه وهمسفری یونانی سخن می‌گوید که در ماجراهای پس از آزادی، مدام تکرار می‌کرد: «جنگ همیشه هست!» او این جمله را در حالی به ز…

❤8👍1

28 Jun 2025, 21:38 UTC≈3,340 views14 reactionsread 5 November 2026

بورگ می گوید که در جلسات تحلیل، نمی‌داند آیا جویس دوباره به‌عنوان یک «من» یکپارچه منسجم می شود یا او (خود بورگ) است که دارد تکه‌تکه می‌شود بورگ خود را بین نقش درمانگری که انسجام را بازمی‌گرداند و انسانی که در تعامل با جویس خُرد و پاره‌پاره می‌شود، گرفتار می‌بیند. بورگ به اثر این نوع بودن جویس و اتفاقات پیرامونی مثل جنگ و ۱۱ سپتامبر بر درنگ و تأملات شخصی خودش اشاره می‌کند ،اینکه چگونه ساحت اندیشه‌ورزی و نظریات او درب…

❤5🙏5👏3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Psychoanalysis_Philosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @Psychoanalysis_Philosophy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روانكاوی” (@Psychoanalysis_Philosophy), 5,940 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Psychoanalysis_Philosophy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.