🚨🚨🚨Free vip🚨🚨🚨: 1. Bitcoin Bullets 2. Crypto Coins Coach B 3. Crypto Zone 4. CryptoVipSignals 5. Rose

Channel
Pulse Bulletin
@Pulse_Bulletin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
34,477subscribers
-2,127 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001180509146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pulse_Bulletin |
| Description | Disclaimer: nothing said by the administrators should be construed as financial advice, do your own DD/research Admin: @heyamandaver |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pulse_Bulletin |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 34,477 | -62 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 34,539 | -37 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 34,576 | -104 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 34,680 | -171 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 34,851 | -307 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:02 | 35,158 | -220 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 35,378 | -111 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:27 | 35,489 | -84 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:04 | 35,573 | -37 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 35,610 | -55 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:29 | 35,665 | -35 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 35,700 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 35,713 | -27 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 35,740 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 35,762 | -34 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 35,796 | -39 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 35,835 | -88 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 35,923 | -61 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 35,984 | -33 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 36,017 | first reading |
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 46.0%
- avg views ÷ 34,477 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15,900
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (21 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 364,690 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 04:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,240
- Videos
- ≈1
- Links
- ≈891
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
🔥#LTC Update🔥 Target 1: 51✅ Target 2: 53✅ Target 3: 56✅ Target 4: 60✅ Profit: 168.2% on 5x lev🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ — Bitcoin Trading @Pulse_Bulletin
🔥#DASH Update🔥 Signal: #B333 (LONG) Target 1: 57.50✅ Target 2: 60.00✅ Profit: 45.5% on 5x lev🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ — Bitcoin Trading @Pulse_Bulletin
🔥#DASH Update🔥 Signal: #B333 (LONG) Target 1: 57.50✅ Target 2: 60.00✅ Profit: 45.5% on 5x lev🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ — Bitcoin Trading @Pulse_Bulletin
$BTC weekly just closed as a bullish engulfing candle. @Pulse_Bulletin
🔥#DASH Update🔥 Signal: #B333 (LONG) Target 1: 57.50✅ Profit: 22.7% on 5x lev🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ — Bitcoin Trading @Pulse_Bulletin
Alts are breaking out @Pulse_Bulletin
🎬🎵 𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗙𝗟𝗜𝗫 + 𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗧𝗜𝗙𝗬 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗔𝗟𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗𝗬 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗢𝗙 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗛𝗟𝗬 𝗕𝗨𝗗𝗚𝗘? Then your first month with a Bybit EU Card could be interesting. Eligible new Bybit Card users can receive up to 100% of the qualifying subscription payment value back in Reward Points, subject to the promotion rules and a €50 maximum. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝗱𝗲𝗱? 🤖 ChatGPT 🎬 Netflix 🎵 Spotify 📦 Amazon Prime 📈 TradingView 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗳𝘆: 1️⃣ Have an active Bybit …
Alts are breaking out @Pulse_Bulletin
💰 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗗𝗢𝗡'𝗧 𝗡𝗘𝗘𝗗 𝗧𝗢 𝗟𝗘𝗧 𝗔 𝗪𝗘𝗔𝗟𝗧𝗛 𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗚𝗘𝗥 𝗕𝗨𝗜𝗟𝗗 𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗬𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗬𝗢𝗨 That's one of the biggest changes with Bybit PWM 2.0. For eligible VIP2+ users, private wealth management is now accessible directly through the Bybit interface. Instead of going through manual portfolio configuration, you can choose how you want to build your allocation. 𝗢𝗣𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝟭 — 𝗕𝗨𝗜𝗟𝗗 𝗜𝗧 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥𝗦𝗘𝗟𝗙 Select products and decide how much to allocate…
📌 SIGNAL ID: #B333 COIN: #DASH/USDT (3-5x) Direction: LONG | Type: Swing ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ENTRY: 54.50 - 55.00 TARGETS: 57.50 – 60.00 – 63.00 - 67.00 - 72.00 - 78.00 - 85.00 - 92.00 - 100.00 STOP LOSS: 50.00 BCH reclaimed the 230.0–255.0 demand zone with an explosive 4H breakout, confirming a bullish structure flip off the ascending trendline built from the mid-August low. Momentum is building as price holds above 264.7 afte…
🔥#LTC Update🔥 Target 1: 51✅ Target 2: 53✅ Target 3: 56✅ Profit: 123.6% on 5x lev🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ — Bitcoin Trading @Pulse_Bulletin
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @Pulse_Bulletin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Pulse_Bulletin edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 19 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 19 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pulse Bulletin” (@Pulse_Bulletin), 34,477 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pulse_Bulletin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.