Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Честный Путин (Пал Лаич)

Channel

Честный Путин (Пал Лаич)

@Putin_V_V

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,328subscribers

-164 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001474235857
TypeChannel
Username@Putin_V_V
Created10 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Putin_V_V

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Честный Путин — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

21,32221,49221,4076 August 2026 — 21,492 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,492 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,490 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,492 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,479 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,478 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,476 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,473 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,466 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,460 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,452 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,443 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,436 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,435 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,434 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,421 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,413 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,423 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,411 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,408 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,404 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,405 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,402 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,395 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,386 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,363 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,358 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,349 subscribers5 September 2026 — 21,337 subscribers8 September 2026 — 21,322 subscribers11 September 2026 — 21,328 subscribers21,3286 August 202611 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 36 days, net -164. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,297–21,518 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 06:1821,328+6
8 Sept 2026, 07:1921,322-15
5 Sept 2026, 05:0121,337-12
3 Sept 2026, 13:3721,349-9
2 Sept 2026, 05:2721,358-5
1 Sept 2026, 07:2921,363-23
31 Aug 2026, 04:5321,386-9
30 Aug 2026, 03:4721,395-7
29 Aug 2026, 01:5721,402-3
28 Aug 2026, 01:3821,405+1
27 Aug 2026, 00:5821,404-4
26 Aug 2026, 04:3321,408-3
25 Aug 2026, 06:4221,411-12
24 Aug 2026, 04:5821,423+10
22 Aug 2026, 13:1721,413-8
21 Aug 2026, 00:4521,421-13
19 Aug 2026, 22:1621,434-1
19 Aug 2026, 00:2221,435-1
18 Aug 2026, 00:2421,436-7
16 Aug 2026, 21:3821,443first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 22 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
70.0%
avg views ÷ 21,328 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,900
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held27 (22 May 20263 September 2026)
Views total104,510
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 16:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
141
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 27 we hold a reading for · 78%
Most on one post
26
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Putin_V_V. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 May 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.70%
1 of 27 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
3,510
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
38,300
over 26 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 12:53 UTC≈3,510 viewsread 3 September 2026
AdvertisementVideo

Блин, опять впн не работает... Знакомо?) А мне с этим впном нет🙃 📡 Обходки глушилок и белых списков 🌎 Разные локации 💻 Бесконечное количество устройств 🌐 Безлимит на трафик(обходки тоже безлимит) 💛 SAVE VPN — ЛУЧШИЙ ВПН! Попробуй бесплатно👇 #Реклама

1 Sept 2026, 07:38 UTC≈9,600 views0 reactions4 Starsread 3 September 2026

СЛЫХАЛИ, КОСАТКИ МЕДВЕДЕЙ ЖРУТ!? КАК МЕЛЮЗГУ! А ЦАПЛИ ЖАБ ХУЯРЯТ. А ЖУКИ-СКАРАБЕИ - ВЕРБЛЮЖЬЕ ГОВНО. МЫ, КАК ВЫСОКОДУХОВНЫЕ ЛЮДИ, ПРОСТО НЕ МОГЛИ СМИРИТЬСЯ С ЭТИМ БЕЗОБРАЗИЕМ. ПОЭТОМУ МЫ И НАЧАЛИ СПЕЦИАЛЬНУЮ ВОЕННУЮ ОПЕРАЦИЮ!

1 Sept 2026, 01:37 UTC≈10,100 views0 reactions3 Starsread 3 September 2026

ТАМ ЧОТА НАШ ТОЛСТОЖОПЫЙ ДРУГ МИРОНЫЧ ЗАБОЛЕЛ ТО ЛИ ПАСТЕРЕЛЛЁЗОМ, ТО ЛИ ПАРАМИ СВИНЦА ОТ КУВАЛДЫ НАДЫШАЛСЯ, ХУЙ ЕГО ЗНАЕТ. КОРОЧЕ, ЗАПЕРСЯ В СОРТИРЕ, ХОХОЧЕТ И ЖРЁТ СОБСТВЕННОЕ ГОВНО. СКАЖЕТЕ, ЧТО ОН ВСЕ ЭТО И РАНЬШЕ ДЕЛАЛ? НИХУЯ: РАНЬШЕ ОН ДЛЯ ЭТОГО В СОРТИРЕ НЕ ЗАПИРАЛСЯ. https://t.me/Ateobreaking/176696

24 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC≈18,900 views0 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026

ЕСЛИ БЫ У БАБУШКИ БЫЛ ХУЙ, ТО КОЛОБОК УШЁЛ БЫ ОТ ДВУХ ДЕДУШЕК. ВОТ И ДУМАЙТЕ.

23 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC≈20,200 views0 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

Я НЕ ПОНЯЛ, КОМУ-ТО НЕ НРАВИТСЯ ТОВАРИЩ НЕГР КАНИ УЭСТ? ВЫ ОХУЕЛИ ЧТО ЛИ? ЭТО Ж САМЫЙ ОХУЕННЫЙ НЕГР! ВСПОМНИТЕ ОБАМУ-ЧМО: ЛИБЕРАСТ, ЗА МИР, ДЕМОКРАТИЮ, ГИТЛЕРА НЕ ЛЮБИТ, ЖЕНУ ГОЛУЮ НА ПОВОДКЕ НЕ ВОДИТ. ГОВНО, А НЕ НЕГР. А ВОТ КАНИ МОЛОДЕЦ. ДАМ ЕМУ ФУРАЖКУ ГИТЛЕРА ПОНОСИТЬ.

22 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC≈18,200 viewsread 3 September 2026

7 ДНЕЙ ХАЛЯВНОГО VPN, НЕ ЕБИ МОЗГИ, ЗАБИРАЙ! 👉Telegram-бот

25 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC≈37,600 viewsread 3 September 2026

КАКОЙ ЖЕ ДАВАЛКИН УМНИЧКА, КАК ГОВОРЮ, ТАК И ГОЛОСУЕТ! https://t.me/Ateobreaking/174598

24 Jul 2026, 21:47 UTC≈38,400 views0 reactions5 Starsread 3 September 2026

🍏 — ОНИ ОХУЕЛИ ПРОТИВ ДВИЖУХИ ВЫСТУПАТЬ?

24 Jul 2026, 21:34 UTC≈40,100 views0 reactions7 Starsread 3 September 2026

ПРЕКРАТИТЕ НЫТЬ, ЁБАНЫЕ МАМКИНЫ БИЗНЕСМЕНЫ! МНЕ ПОХУЙ, ЧО И ГДЕ У ВАС ТАМ СГОРЕЛО! НАДО БЫЛО НЕ КИТАЙСКОЙ ХУЕТОЙ ВТРИДОРОГА БАРЫЖИТЬ, А НОРМАЛЬНЫМ БИЗНЕСОМ ЗАНИМАТЬСЯ! ВОН ПОСМОТРИТЕ НА АРКАШУ РОТЕНБЕРГА. ИЛИ НА ИГОРЬКА СЕЧИНА. ДОВОЛЬНЫЕ, РАДОСТНЫЕ, НЕ НОЮТ НИХУЯ.

13 Jul 2026, 22:29 UTC≈43,000 views0 reactions4 Starsread 3 September 2026

Я ВООБЩЕ В ЭТИХ ЗАУМНЫХ ТЕРМИНАХ НИХУЯ НЕ ПОНИМАЮ, ПОДСКАЖИТЕ, А ВОТ ЕСЛИ НА УКРАИНЕ ТЕПЕРЬ НАЧНУТ ДЕЛАТЬ "ПЭТРИОТЫ" И РАКЕТЫ "SCALP" ЭТО НАЗЫВАЕТСЯ ДЕМИЛИТАРИЗАЦИЯ ИЛИ ДЕНАЦИФИКАЦИЯ? ПУТАЮ ПОСТОЯННО.

9 Jul 2026, 22:11 UTC≈41,600 viewsread 3 September 2026

КОРОЧЕ, НЕ ЕБИ МОЗГИ, ЗАБИРАЙ РАБОЧИЕ ВПНЫ И БESПЛАТНЫЕ ПРОКСИ https://freedomchecker.ateo.digital

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @Putin_V_V. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ateo
@AteoGo · 148,855
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
✨Sirius VPN
@siriusvpn · 67,770
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Ateo Breaking
@ateobreaking · 676,199
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Честный Путин (Пал Лаич)” (@Putin_V_V), 21,328 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Putin_V_V.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.