Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⚖قوانین زیرکس⚖

Channel

⚖قوانین زیرکس⚖

@QQaVaNeN

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

13,389subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002003741909
TypeChannel
Username@QQaVaNeN
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/QQaVaNeN

Growth

13,33213,39913,365.57 August 2026 — 13,364 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,365 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,367 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,374 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,360 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,362 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,367 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,374 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,363 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,372 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,377 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,362 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,367 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,369 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,370 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,372 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,379 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,362 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,358 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,340 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,332 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,340 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,349 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,352 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,371 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,382 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,399 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,389 subscribers13,3897 August 20267 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 31 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,322–13,409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 08:4013,389-10
4 Sept 2026, 11:1613,399+17
3 Sept 2026, 01:1513,382+11
2 Sept 2026, 01:3213,371+19
31 Aug 2026, 23:1813,352+3
30 Aug 2026, 20:0313,349+9
29 Aug 2026, 17:3313,340+8
28 Aug 2026, 16:1213,332-8
27 Aug 2026, 16:2313,340-18
26 Aug 2026, 12:4613,358-4
25 Aug 2026, 16:0413,362-17
24 Aug 2026, 19:1713,379+7
23 Aug 2026, 06:4813,372+2
21 Aug 2026, 21:3813,370+1
20 Aug 2026, 20:4513,369+2
19 Aug 2026, 20:1513,367+5
18 Aug 2026, 23:3213,362-15
17 Aug 2026, 20:1513,377+5
16 Aug 2026, 16:2713,372+9
15 Aug 2026, 01:1313,363first reading

Engagement

78 posts held, back to 20 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 13,389 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,610
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.593%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 78 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held78 (20 May 20252 September 2026)
Views total61,019
Reactions total362
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 43s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,468 reactions across 78 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,468100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,575
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 78 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
980
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @QQaVaNeN. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2025 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:21 UTC465 views6 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

این حرفا از سمت من بود و یا شاید حاجی برنامه ای برای وضعیت داشته باشه ولی لازم بود یک سری توضیح بابتش بدیم.

6

Signed mmD

2 Sept 2026, 16:20 UTC447 views8 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

بابت نرخ ثابت هم داخل کشوری که هر 2 دقیقه دلار 🇺🇸 بالا و پایین میشه نمیشه نرخ ثابت گذاشت چرا؟ ➕ مثلا ما یک نرخی برای 300 میلیون میگیم و در زمان حال اون نرخ میشه 30 درصد ولی در فردا میبینی همون نرخ میشه 50 درصد و این راه نیاز به اپدیت روزانه داره.

8

Signed mmD

2 Sept 2026, 16:15 UTC449 views5 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

منظور از این حرف اینه که بعضی از واسط های متفرقه با وعده درصد های کمتر از سوی ادمین هاشون شمارو به سمت خودشون میکشن ولی عقل سالم 🧠 با 2 دقیقه تفکر میفهمه خودشون تامین زنن و از خداشونه شما وابسته اونا بشید.

5

Signed mmD

2 Sept 2026, 16:13 UTC483 views7 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

و بابت نرخ یک توضیحی بدیم که ما هم به ادمین ها اعلام کردیم و ما خودمون هم دخالتی بابت نرخ انجام نمیدیم همونجوری که نرخ تامین کننده ها شده بود میلی 1 دول با اتحاد درستش کردند. پیشنهاد ما اینه شست زن ها با اتحاد تامین زن ها و یا خودشون این موضوع رو میتونند حل کنند بهترین راه اتحاده - و نزارید از فرصت ها بعضی از چص ممبر های فیش بخان سو استفاده کنند! و هم دلالی رو ممنوع کردیم به علت این که تامین با نرخ اصلی وارد گپ بش

7

Signed mmD

2 Sept 2026, 16:08 UTC465 views7 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

به نظرم بحثا بی فایدست پاک میکنم تا باز ممبرا اذیت نشن از حاشیه ها❤️ +و عده ای نخوان از این فرصت ممبر بگیرن

7

Signed mmD

2 Sept 2026, 07:20 UTC902 views22 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

یه جمله خیلی دوستانه به اون تیم تبچی فروش یا اون تیم واژن ک خودم اوردم بالا یا اون 🍗فیش خایمال خواستم بگم : هروقت که خواستین در مورد زیرکس نظر بدین قبلش به این فکر کنین سگ کی هسین شاید بعد نظرتون من بپرسم ناراحت شین با احترام💙

22

Signed 𝐇𝐀𝐉𝐈

1 Sept 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,380 views12 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

⁉️ از کل فیشینگ دعوت میشه داخل چنل جوین باشید تا قبل از هر معامله ایدی طرفتون رو سرچ کنید تا از معاملتون مطمعن باشید! موفق باشید، ارزوی معامله ای بی خطر برای شما❤️

12

Signed mmD

1 Sept 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,400 views6 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

▪ به علت حجم بالای تبرها در واسط های دیگر! تیم زیرکس تصمیم گرفت یک تبردونی فعال راه بندازه! در صورتی که کسی تبرتون زد چه در واسطه های دیگر و یا چه در پیوی مدارک کامل رو به دایرکت چنل تبردونی ارسال کنید و ادمین ها با راستی ازمایی بنرتون رو منتشر میکنند ورود به چنل: @ViBaQ ✅ @ViBaQ ✅

6

Signed mmD

1 Sept 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,690 views18 reactions2 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

۵۰ بزنی تموم شه؟ مادرجنده ادمینت ۲۰۰ تبر زده براچی باید ۵۰ تسویه کنی وقتی سقفشو گزاشتی ۱۰۰۰ دلار😐😂 کسننتون اینقد گنده گوزیدین ۲۰۰ دول نداشتین تسویه کنین؟ برا همیناس ممبرا میزنن تو سرتون حسابتون نمیکنن از بس که حقیرو بدبختین

18

Signed 𝐇𝐀𝐉𝐈

1 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,680 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

5

Signed 𝐇𝐀𝐉𝐈

1 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC≈1,620 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

7

Signed 𝐇𝐀𝐉𝐈

1 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,720 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

این مادرجنده ها هم گفتیم بزنین ننشونو بگایین اخرش تبر زد ادمینشون ولی جالب ترش اینجاس که ۲۰۰ دول نداشتن تسویه کنن😂😂 گپ چتشون همیشه در حد گپ چت میمونه

6

Signed 𝐇𝐀𝐉𝐈

Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @QQaVaNeN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚖قوانین زیرکس⚖” (@QQaVaNeN), 13,389 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QQaVaNeN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.