【9月6日首发:背靠背迎战,TheShy对位Cube,HOYA交手Burdol】 2026LPL第三赛段季后赛9月6日首发名单: 14:00 iG对战WE(BO5) 约17:00 LGD对战NIP(BO5) 解说:毛毛、瞳夕、乘风儿、记得、Rita、王淞 主持:小悠 互动主持:骆歆
❤1

Channel
@QSTY2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50,505subscribers
-12,230 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001229895566 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QSTY2 |
| Description | 🚀 欢迎来到 【极速电竞】 —— 您的终极电竞情报站!🎮 关注我们,一手掌握全球顶尖电竞赛事:英雄联盟 王者荣耀 绝地求生 DOTA2 CS2 无畏契约 反恐精英2 穿越火线等等。 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QSTY2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 50,505 | -113 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:47 | 50,618 | -222 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:04 | 50,840 | -134 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:48 | 50,974 | -93 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 51,067 | -111 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 51,178 | -148 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 51,326 | -116 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 51,442 | -86 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 51,528 | -114 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 51,642 | -184 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 51,826 | -221 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 52,047 | -377 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 52,424 | -123 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 52,547 | -3,808 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 56,355 | -143 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 56,498 | -4,727 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 61,225 | -154 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 61,379 | -277 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 61,656 | -200 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 61,856 | first reading |
325 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 90 of 278 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 325 (6 August 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 664,514 |
| Reactions total | 114 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
131 reactions across 104 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 63 | 48.1% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 23.7% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 10.7% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 8.40% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.29% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.29% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.29% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.53% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.763% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 325 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 325 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【9月6日首发:背靠背迎战,TheShy对位Cube,HOYA交手Burdol】 2026LPL第三赛段季后赛9月6日首发名单: 14:00 iG对战WE(BO5) 约17:00 LGD对战NIP(BO5) 解说:毛毛、瞳夕、乘风儿、记得、Rita、王淞 主持:小悠 互动主持:骆歆
❤1
#LPL 中国职业联赛 - 第三赛段季后赛 NIP 对战 JDG(BO5) 第三局独赢:NIP 击杀让分:NIP+3.5 击杀人头:大27.5 比赛时间:小32
❤1
#LCK 韩国冠军联赛 - 季后赛 HLE 对战 GEN( BO5) 第四局独赢:HLE 击杀让分:HLE+4.5 击杀人头:大27.5 比赛时间:大32
#LPL 中国职业联赛 - 第三赛段季后赛 NIP 对战 JDG(BO5) 第一局独赢:NIP 击杀让分:NIP+4.5 击杀人头:大27.5 比赛时间:小33
#LPL 中国职业联赛 - 第三赛段季后赛 NIP 对战 JDG(BO5) 第一局独赢:NIP 击杀让分:NIP+4.5 击杀人头:大27.5 比赛时间:小33
#LPL 中国职业联赛 - 第三赛段季后赛 IG 对战 TES(BO5) 第五局独赢:TES 击杀让分:TES+3.5 击杀人头:大29.5 比赛时间:大32
#LCK 韩国冠军联赛 - 季后赛 HLE 对战 GEN( BO5) 第一局独赢:HLE 击杀让分:HLE+4.5 击杀人头:大27.5 比赛时间:大32
【季后赛D3英雄麦克疯-Xun:保持饥饿才有“杀戮”感】 2026LPL季后赛D3英雄麦克疯。 Bin:有“复活”甲,有“复活”甲。 Xun:保持饥饿才有“杀戮”感。 Knight :你的钳子有点长啊。 Viper :别想太多就行了,该干嘛干嘛。 ON :哇,到贤(Viper)拉扯无敌。
【KT赛后更新动态:我们会以更加强大的姿态归来】 2026年,衷心感谢所有与KT一同欢笑、也一同流泪的粉丝们。 正因为有大家热烈的呐喊与支持,我们才能在动摇的时刻一次次重新站起来。 对于没能完全达到大家期待的遗憾,我们会深深铭记并以更加强大的姿态归来。 我们不会忘记这一年来大家给予我们的厚爱与支持。
#LPL 中国职业联赛 - 第三赛段季后赛 AL 对战 LGD(BO5) 第四局独赢:AL 击杀让分:LGD+7.5 击杀人头:小27.5 比赛时间:大31
Photo, posted without a caption
#LCK 韩国冠军联赛 - 季后赛 KT 对战 DK( BO5) 第四局独赢:DK 击杀让分:KT+4.5 击杀人头:小25.5 比赛时间:大32
Showing the 12 most recent of 325 posts we hold for @QSTY2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“极速电竞” (@QSTY2), 50,505 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QSTY2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.