打 soul 的进来一下 bro 们 以后这个群会是灵魂最大交流群 这个群不上管理 打广告直接飞 https://t.me/soulsf1
Signed 起源-色粉圈代言人
Channel
@QYQYGE
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10,604subscribers
+6,402 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1004394205199 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @QYQYGE |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 20 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/QYQYGE |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:06 | 10,604 | +60 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:49 | 10,544 | +98 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:37 | 10,446 | +87 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:41 | 10,359 | +100 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:45 | 10,259 | +147 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:37 | 10,112 | +77 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:09 | 10,035 | +225 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:09 | 9,810 | +235 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 9,575 | +66 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:01 | 9,509 | +588 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 07:07 | 8,921 | +1,036 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:15 | 7,885 | +144 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 7,741 | +243 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 7,498 | +271 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 7,227 | +467 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 6,760 | +465 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:42 | 6,295 | +205 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 6,090 | +297 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 5,793 | +252 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:28 | 5,541 | first reading |
119 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 43 of 103 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 119 (20 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 112,057 |
| Reactions total | 96 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 08:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
131 reactions across 50 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 84 | 64.1% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 14.5% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 7.63% | |
| 💩 | 8 | 6.11% | |
| 🤮 | 6 | 4.58% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 103 posts held from the last 30 days (8.74%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
打 soul 的进来一下 bro 们 以后这个群会是灵魂最大交流群 这个群不上管理 打广告直接飞 https://t.me/soulsf1
Signed 起源-色粉圈代言人
https://t.me/GGBGFQ 没进群的进群一下 粉圈最权威的曝光群 有纠纷都是免费在线处理 开庭 帮你拿到钱之后也不会收取任何费用 有纠纷的联系我就行 没进群的进一下 每天都有节目
Signed 瓜瓜 粉圈曝光的神
手里有能变现的项目可以来谈下 你提供项目 我提供流量
Signed 新一
打 soul 的进来一下 bro 们 以后这个群会是灵魂最大交流群 这个群不上管理 打广告直接飞 https://t.me/soulsf1
👍2
Signed 起源-色粉圈代言人
Q频道V扫 灵魂卡片浏览器 快手同城自热浏览器 王者浏览器 抖音直播V扫 浏览器 视频号直播V扫 浏览器 小平台V扫 浏览器 无限吃 无限吃🌟 联系: 耀阳:@yy188288🌟 耀蒙:@tuany9999🌟
❤2
Signed 起源-色粉圈代言人
没有人了吗扣 1 啊我送礼物
❤1
Signed 起源-色粉圈代言人
扣 1 随机送二个典藏礼物
❤1
Signed 起源-色粉圈代言人
你会打你麻痹
👍6❤2
Signed 起源(有事留言 看见会回复)
我自己打的色播截留浏览器 还有火影忍者大厅浏览器 吃的联系我各位大哥 @VIPGua
❤2👍2
Signed 瓜瓜 粉圈曝光的神
收全平台姿势上码 💡 只想给你们一个稳定的家 收一手工作室 来稳定中介 带上对接记录来 有好粉滴滴我 我来包养你。 锦川盘口直收全渠道S粉 跳槽提供对接记录 单价+1+2+3过滤按你的来开 诚信经🈺 长久🈴作 致富之路 @jinli3366
👍2❤1
Signed 起源(有事留言 看见会回复)
一词收粉 打完结算日收万量地址可以验证 可以找我和瓜瓜担保 创速也上压了5000u 实力大中介 真粉包结算 打手打粉路上的最佳选项 一手工作室直接包养 可压起源万u 给你的只有靠谱二字 什么姿势都可以来测!!! 一词给你的只有靠谱 @Ycwn10
👍4
Signed 起源(有事留言 看见会回复)
新群 和灵魂群 有管理位置 大群没有 需要来 @QYQYBA 上管理送大群频道管理
👍1
Signed 起源(有事留言 看见会回复)
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @QYQYGE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@QYQYGE named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“粉圈之家新频道” (@QYQYGE), 10,604 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QYQYGE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.