Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𓆩‌‌‌‌‌𓄂313𓆃𓆪

Channel

𓆩‌‌‌‌‌𓄂313𓆃𓆪

@Qhaem313

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

426subscribers

+62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002520047009
TypeChannel
Username@Qhaem313
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Qhaem313

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3644263957 August 2026 — 364 subscribers8 August 2026 — 364 subscribers8 August 2026 — 369 subscribers15 August 2026 — 377 subscribers23 August 2026 — 404 subscribers29 August 2026 — 416 subscribers7 September 2026 — 422 subscribers14 September 2026 — 426 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 38 days, net +62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 355–435 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 16:41426+4
7 Sept 2026, 02:02422+6
29 Aug 2026, 18:25416+12
23 Aug 2026, 04:25404+27
15 Aug 2026, 05:45377+8
8 Aug 2026, 11:50369+5
8 Aug 2026, 06:32364no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:31364first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1829.5%
👏1321.3%
❤‍🔥914.8%
🔥914.8%
💯46.56%
🤯34.92%
👌23.28%
11.64%
11.64%
🙏11.64%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC31 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#توحید | #خدا_شناسی اگر ریسمانی به سوی زمین به سمت پائین آویزان کنید ؛ بر خدا فرود می‌آید! 👳‍♂️ الترمذي صاحب صحاح‌سته اهل‌تسنن آیا #ایمان نمی‌آورید ؟؟ ؟

🤯3❤‍🔥1🔥1

Signed 𔓙 عثمٰان 𔓙

7 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC37 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

𓆩‌‌‌‌‌𓄂313𓆃𓆪 سلام علیکم خدمت خواهران و برادران محترم دوستان تمامی تلاش خود را انجام می دهند تا بتوانند از مکتب تشیع دفاع کرده و مطالبی جامع و کامل خدمت شما عزیزان ارائه دهند و هیچ چشم داشتی از کسی ندارند جز اینکه با حمایت کردن اعم از فوروارد کردن ، ری اکت دادن و... مایه دلگرمی شده و ایجاد کننده انگیزه مضاعف جهت خدمت رسانی هرچه بیشتر و بهتر توسط دوستان شوید. و من الله توفیق برادرکوچک شما اباالحسن

7👏211❤‍🔥1🔥1🙏1

7 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC109 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

برتری امیرالمومنین {ع} بر گذشتگان و آیندگان هبیرة بن یریم می گوید شنیدم که حسن بن علی شروع به سخنرانی کرد و گفت: ای مردم، دیروز مردی از میان شما رفت که نه اولین (پیشینیان) از او سبقت گرفتند و نه آخرین (افراد پس از او) او را درک می کنند و پیامبر او را در جنگ ها می فرستاد و پرچم را به او می داد و او باز نمی گشت تا این که خداوند فتح و پیروزی را نصیب او کند و جبرئیل در سمت راستش و میکائیل در سمت چپش بود.چیزی از خود با

3👌1🔥1

Signed 𓄂إبن‌عليّ𓆃

7 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC37 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#علم_رجال يحيي‌بن‌معین از استوانه‌های‌علم‌رجالی ؛ خلاف‌عقیده‌اهل‌سنت ؛ حضرت‌عليّٖ را برتر از عثمان می‌دانست و به‌کسی‌که این #عقیده را نداشت فحش‌رکیک می‌داد. 😂🤭 حتی سَلَف نیز درباره برتری حضرت‌عليّ و أبي‌بکر اختلاف‌نظر داشتند. 👳‍♂️ إبن‌عبدالبِّر عالم مشهور اهل‌سنت 📚 الإستیعاب‌في‌معرفةالأصحاب جلد ۳ صحفه ١١١٦ ناشر دارالجيل سال‌چاپ ١٤١٢ھ.ق #انصاف #وجدان #هدایت_کننده

💯31🔥1

Signed 𔓙 عثمٰان 𔓙

7 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC36 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#اهل_سنت تا قبل از دوره أحمدبن‌حنبل ؛ عليّ(ع) را به عنوان خلیفه‌چهارم قبول نداشتند : 👳‍♂️ گفتم معرفی عليّ(ع) به عنوان ‎#خلیفه_چهارم اعتراض بر طلحه و زبیر است؛ وقتی خلافت را به او دادی؛ واجب‌الاطاعت شد و حقوق خلفای‌ثلاثه را گرفت. 👳‍♂️ گفت او خودش را أميرالمؤمنین خوانده ؛ با کسی که او را #خلیفه_چهارم نداند؛ ازدواج نکنید و سخن نگوئید! #جمل #ناکثین

1❤‍🔥1👌1👏1🔥1

Signed 𔓙 عثمٰان 𔓙

7 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC102 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قاتل امیرالمومنین در زبان رسول الله رسول اکرم قاتل حضرت علی علیه السلام را بد بخت ترین فرد معرفی کرده اند چنان چه فرمودند: یاعلي! من أشقي الأولين و الآخرين؟ قال: الله و رسوله أعلم. قال: أشقي الأولين: عاقر الناقة وأشقي الآخرين: الذي يطعنك يا علي. شقي‌ترين مردم امت‌هاي نخستين و آخرين كيست؟ حضرت علي (عليه السلام) فرمود: خدا و پيامبرش بهتر مي‌دانند. پيامبر اكرم (صلي الله عليه و آله) فرمود: شقي‌ترين امت‌هاي اول، كسي ا

❤‍🔥21👏1🔥1

Signed 𓄂إبن‌عليّ𓆃

7 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC104 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#ابن_ملجم #امیرالمومنین ܦ̇ܦ̈ط حیܥ‌‌ܝ‌(؏) ߊ‌ܩیܝ‌ߊ‌ܠܩوܩܝ̇ߺیܔ ߊ‌ܢܚࡅ߳ߺߺܙ

3❤‍🔥2👏1🔥1

Signed 𓄂إبن‌عليّ𓆃

7 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC33 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏41❤‍🔥1💯1🔥1

Signed 𔓙 عثمٰان 𔓙

7 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC29 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏41❤‍🔥1🔥1

Signed 𔓙 عثمٰان 𔓙

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Qhaem313. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𓆩‌‌‌‌‌𓄂313𓆃𓆪” (@Qhaem313), 426 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Qhaem313.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.