Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for QRS - QлубRефлексирующихSпециалистов

Channel

QRS - QлубRефлексирующихSпециалистов

@QlubReflectiveSpecialists

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,882subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001441134234
TypeChannel
Username@QlubReflectiveSpecialists
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/QlubReflectiveSpecialists

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8821,8941,8887 August 2026 — 1,892 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,892 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,891 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,893 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,894 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,890 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,888 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,885 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,884 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,883 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,882 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 43 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,880–1,896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:401,882-1
14 Sept 2026, 23:221,883-1
7 Sept 2026, 01:181,884-1
2 Sept 2026, 20:451,885-3
27 Aug 2026, 00:131,888-2
20 Aug 2026, 00:541,890-4
16 Aug 2026, 21:331,894+1
13 Aug 2026, 09:571,893+2
10 Aug 2026, 15:441,891-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:321,892no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:191,892first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
337.5%
👎337.5%
👍112.5%
💊112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC47 viewsread 7 August 2026

Добрый день! Немного науки: В Вестнике аритмологии, том 33, № 2 (2026) вышла интересная статья, касающаяся нетрадиционных подходов к лечению брадикардий. Шабанов В.В., Косенко Э.В., Зейналов Д.Ф., Халхожаев Т.У., Сергеевичев Д.С., Филиппенко А.Г., Романов А.Б. Биоинженерная генерация сердечного ритма: роль биопейсмейкерных клеток. Вестник аритмологии. 2026;33(2):e1-e11. https://doi.org/10.35336/VA-1588. EDN: MJMZYC Б

3 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Добрый день! Новые технологии в суточном мониторировании ЭКГ: ученые создали модель ИИ DeepHHF, которая анализирует суточную запись ЭКГ по Холтеру и умеет замечать риск развития сердечной недостаточности за 5 лет до появления явных симптомов. DeepHHF (Deep Learning for Heart Failure) — это передовая модель глубокого обучения (ИИ), разработанная израильскими учеными из Техниона (Израильского технологического института

1

1 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC77 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наш канал в Макс https://max.ru/join/fAL2sn-2dQEVLG-nm23vXKjLFvc0M3oNckbJuz20EHs

👎1

1 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC75 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Добрый вечер, коллеги! Предлагаем принять участие в Региональном конгрессе РКО в Санкт-Петербурге, который будет проходить 21 и 22 августа 2026 Адрес: КОНГРЕСС ЦЕНТР «КОЛОМЯЖСКИЙ», КОЛОМЯЖСКИЙ ПР., Д. 21 Программа Конгресса по ссылке: https://2b1938e6-492b-4229-97a0-831bf8c6d707.selstorage.ru/2026/region/Programm_St_Petersburg.pdf Регистрация: https://event.scardio.ru/event/1040

2

30 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC90 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день, коллеги! Пациентка, 50 лет, с жалобами на слабость, головокружение на фоне аритмии в ночное время. В 2025 году перенесла РЧА по поводу ПРАВУТ. Была направлена на суточное мониторирование ЭКГ, и вот какой красивый короткий, но симптомный пароксизм был зафиксирован. На ЭКГ пароксизм неустойчивой желудочковой тахикардии, видны критерии АВ-диссоциации, зубцы Р идут независимо от комплексов QRS.

26 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC111 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наш канал в Макс https://max.ru/join/fAL2sn-2dQEVLG-nm23vXKjLFvc0M3oNckbJuz20EHs

👎1💊1

26 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC101 viewsread 7 August 2026

Изучение ишемии с системой мониторирования Нормокард, узнать подробнее можно по ссылке: https://normocard.ru/ Или по номеру телефона: +7 921 993-89-50

26 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC95 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый вечер! Критерием ишемии миокарда при выполнении лестничных проб во время холтеровского мониторирования (ХМ) ЭКГ является смещение сегмента ST от изолинии, соответствующее правилу «1 × 1 × 1». Для верификации ишемии на фоне дозированной нагрузки (подъема по лестнице) оценивают комплекс клинических и электрокардиографических признаков. Классические критерии ЭКГ (Правило «1 × 1 × 1») Эпизод признается ишемически

24 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC75 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Добрый день! Вопрос по лестничным пробам: Какую диагностическую ценность лестничной пробы вы считаете наиболее значимой?

  1. Выявление преходящих ишемических изменений сегмента ST при физической нагрузке.57%
  2. Оценка хронотропного ответа и динамики интервала QT.14%
  3. Провокация и верификация нарушений ритма и проводимости (экстрасистолия, блокады).0%
  4. Оценка связи субъективных жалоб пациента (одышка, боли) с объективной картиной ЭКГ.71%

The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC73 viewsread 7 August 2026

Изучение аритмий с системой мониторирования Нормокард, узнать подробнее можно по ссылке: https://normocard.ru/ Или по номеру телефона: +7 921 993-89-50

23 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC91 viewsread 7 August 2026

Добрый вечер! Какие существуют критерии, по которым нужно будет направить пациента на повторное исследование? Критерии непригодности суточного мониторирования АД и ЭКГ (Холтера) из-за артефактов: Для СМАД (мониторирования АД) утверждены четкие стандарты: * Минимум 24 успешных замера за сутки для базового анализа. * Минимум 52 замера для детальной оценки (например, вариабельности АД). * Минимум 1 успешное измерение ка

20 Jul 2026, 04:51 UTC99 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наш канал в Макс https://max.ru/join/fAL2sn-2dQEVLG-nm23vXKjLFvc0M3oNckbJuz20EHs

👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @QlubReflectiveSpecialists. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

Добрый день! Вопрос по лестничным пробам: Какую диагностическую ценность лестничной пробы вы считаете наиболее значимой?

  1. Выявление преходящих ишемических изменений сегмента ST при физической нагрузке.57%
  2. Оценка хронотропного ответа и динамики интервала QT.14%
  3. Провокация и верификация нарушений ритма и проводимости (экстрасистолия, блокады).0%
  4. Оценка связи субъективных жалоб пациента (одышка, боли) с объективной картиной ЭКГ.71%

The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

17 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

Добрый вечер, коллеги!

  1. Мышечный тремор, имитирующий фибрилляцию предсердий;57%
  2. Дрейф изолинии из-за плохой подготовки кожи или отклеивания электродов;14%
  3. Наводка от работы электроприборов/смартфонов (сетевая помеха);14%
  4. Потеря сигнала по одному или нескольким каналам в середине записи;14%
  5. Артефакты движения, которые алгоритм принимает за желудочковую тахикардию;57%

The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Лесков
@doctorleskov · 27,877
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“QRS - QлубRефлексирующихSпециалистов” (@QlubReflectiveSpecialists), 1,882 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QlubReflectiveSpecialists.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.