📢 #ترقبوا.. عبر منصة "رادع" 👈 شهادات حصرية للعائدين من معسكر العصابات العميلة في المنطقة الصفراء شمال قطاع غزة. 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza
❤229🫡96👍26🔥13

Channel
@R1Gaza
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
47,835subscribers
+436 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002567807246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @R1Gaza |
| Description | قوة الميدان |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/R1Gaza |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
26,100 average views per post against 47,835 subscribers — an engagement rate of 54.5%. Across the 2,087 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,988 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.68% and 11.7%, with a median of 5.13%.
| Window | 30 days (30 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 26 of 26 published in the window (0 exact, 26 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 677,710 |
| Mature posts only | 55.8% over 25 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 47,835 measured 28 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:ara · 2,087 channels · p10 0.426% · p25 1.68% · p50 5.13% · p75 11.7% · p90 21.0% |
| Position in cohort | 99.425th percentile · 10.6× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.021% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Arabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 29 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 47,835 | +119 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 47,716 | +14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 47,702 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 47,722 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:59 | 47,732 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 47,737 | +81 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 47,656 | +132 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 47,524 | +42 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 47,482 | -32 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 47,514 | +11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 47,503 | +119 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 47,384 | -14 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 47,398 | -11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 47,409 | -12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 47,421 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 47,439 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 47,449 | +30 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 47,419 | +36 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 47,383 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 47,392 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (28 June 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 580,510 |
| Reactions total | 12,093 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19,663 reactions across 39 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10,350 | 52.6% | |
| 🫡 | 4,785 | 24.3% | |
| 👍 | 1,413 | 7.19% | |
| 🔥 | 883 | 4.49% | |
| 💔 | 880 | 4.48% | |
| 😢 | 723 | 3.68% | |
| 💯 | 319 | 1.62% | |
| ⚡ | 96 | 0.488% | |
| 👌 | 66 | 0.336% | |
| 👏 | 56 | 0.285% | |
| ❤🔥 | 50 | 0.254% | |
| 🥰 | 34 | 0.173% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 0.041% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,395reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @R1Gaza. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📢 #ترقبوا.. عبر منصة "رادع" 👈 شهادات حصرية للعائدين من معسكر العصابات العميلة في المنطقة الصفراء شمال قطاع غزة. 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza
❤229🫡96👍26🔥13
📢 "رادع" توقع عددًا من العملاء في كمين شرق الشجاعية 👈 بتاريخ 17 أغسطس 2026، أوقع أبطال قوة "رادع" عددًا من عملاء الاحتلال في كمين قرب شارع مشتهى بحي الشجاعية، شرق مدينة غزة. 👈 وبعد إيقاع إصابات محققة في صفوف العصابات العميلة، أقدم الاحتلال على استهداف أبطالنا بقذائف المدفعية والطيران الحربي، بهدف التغطية على انسحاب العملاء باتجاه معسكر العميل رامي حلس داخل "الخط الأصفر". 👈 وتؤكد "رادع" استمرار ملاحقة العصابات العم…
❤304🫡143🔥28❤🔥9👍7👏3
📌 تصريح أمني.. بشأن تسليم عميل نفسه للأجهزة الأمنية 👈 سلّم أحد العملاء المرتبطين بالاحتلال نفسه للأجهزة الأمنية، بعد تأثره بما ورد في اعترافات العميل م.م، التي سبق أن نُشرت. 👈 ووفق ما سُمح بالكشف عنه، ارتبط العميل بمخابرات الاحتلال بعد قيامه بالتعليق على صفحة "المنسق" في موقع فيسبوك، حيث تلقّى عقب تعليقه مباشرة، اتصالًا من ضابط في مخابرات الاحتلال. سيتم الكشف عن مزيد من التفاصيل لاحقًا. 🏷️ الحارس.. توعية وتحصين ت…
❤246🫡95👍35❤🔥5
#ترقبوا 📌 بعد قليل.. تصريح مهم من أمن المقاومة 🏷️ الحارس.. توعية وتحصين تابع الحارس: t.me/alhares_1
❤191🫡78👍10🔥6
📢 كيف يوفر الاحتلال الغطاء الأمني للعصابات العميلة؟ 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza
❤206🫡74👍26
📢 دوافع الالتحاق بالعصابات العميلة؟ 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza
❤222🫡53👍34🔥15💯14💔7
📢 ماذا يستفيد الاحتلال من العصابات العميلة؟ 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza
👍221💯68🫡42❤30💔7😢7👏3⚡2
📢 مهما حاولوا 👈 لن يستطيعوا إخفاء حقيقة السقوط الأخلاقي داخل العصابات العميلة إن كانت الحيوانات تغار على عرضها وشرفها.. فماذا تنتظر أيها العميل!؟ 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza
❤294💯61🫡55🔥32👍11
📢 قوة "رادع" توثق شهادات مروعة لفارين من معسكر العصابات العميلة 👈 أدلى الفارون، بتاريخ ٢٢ أغسطس ٢٠٢٦، من معسكر العصابات العميلة بشهادات أولية مروعة حول انتهاكات أخلاقية وعمليات ابتزاز وتعذيب داخل معسكر العملاء. 👈 أفاد أحد الفارين بأن كبار العملاء والمتنفذين في عصابة العميل أشرف المنسي ارتكبوا اعتداءات جنسية جماعية بحق نساء، وأجبروا أزواجهن على مشاهدة ذلك وتوثيقه بالكاميرا. 👈 كما أفادت إحدى الفارات بأنها واجهت خطرً…
👍219😢124❤65🫡41💔23🔥8👌6💯5
📢 بيان مهم 👈 تلقّى أمن المقاومة خلال الساعات الأخيرة اتصالات مكثفة من الراغبين في التوبة، ما تسبب في صعوبة أمنية نتيجة انتشار طائرات الاحتلال وتحليقها المكثف. 👈 وبناءً عليه، تهيب "رادع" بالراغبين في التوبة من العصابات العميلة بالالتزام بالسرية التامة وضبط النفس، وانتظار تعليمات أمن المقاومة. وعدناكم.. قريبًا ستكونون بين أبناء شعبكم 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza
❤380🫡154👍15👏10🔥7⚡3💯3👌1
📢 تتوالي الضربات.. 40 شخصًا يعودون إلى حضن شعبهم 👈 في إطار الجهود الأمنية المكثفة، تمكنت قوة "رادع"، بالتعاون مع الأجهزة الأمنية والعشائر والعائلات، من معالجة عدد من ملفات المنضمين إلى العصابات العميلة، ما أثمر عن تسليم 40 شخصًا أنفسهم وعودتهم إلى حضن شعبهم، بينهم رجال ونساء وأطفال. 👈 وتؤكد "رادع" أن هذه الخطوة جاءت نتيجة متابعة حثيثة وجهود متواصلة، إلى جانب الدور الوطني للعائلات والعشائر في احتواء أبنائها ودفعهم إ…
🫡358❤147👍14⚡7🔥7👌2
📢 مصدر أمني في قوة "رادع": 👈 تعاملنا مع عائلات فارّة من معسكر العصابات العميلة الموجود في المنطقة الصفراء شمال قطاع غزة. 👈 ندعو العائلات العالقة إلى عدم التردد في الخروج الفوري من معسكر العصابات العميلة؛ فشعبكم بانتظاركم. 👈 وتؤكد شهادات أولية للعائلات الفارّة من معسكر العصابات العميلة ارتكاب العملاء فظائع وجرائم أخلاقية وجنائية. 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza
❤276🫡115👍25🔥17👌1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @R1Gaza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@R1Gaza edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 3,969 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رادع 🛡️” (@R1Gaza), 47,835 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/R1Gaza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.