Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رادع 🛡️

Channel

رادع 🛡️

@R1Gaza

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

47,835subscribers

+436 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002567807246
TypeChannel
Username@R1Gaza
Descriptionقوة الميدان
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/R1Gaza

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

26,100 average views per post against 47,835 subscribers — an engagement rate of 54.5%. Across the 2,087 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,988 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.68% and 11.7%, with a median of 5.13%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (30 July 2026 29 August 2026)
Posts measured26 of 26 published in the window (0 exact, 26 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled677,710
Mature posts only55.8% over 25 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers47,835 measured 28 August 2026
Cohortb31623:ara · 2,087 channels · p10 0.426% · p25 1.68% · p50 5.13% · p75 11.7% · p90 21.0%
Position in cohort99.425th percentile · 10.6× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.021% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 29 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

47,38347,83547,6096 August 2026 — 47,399 subscribers6 August 2026 — 47,404 subscribers7 August 2026 — 47,392 subscribers8 August 2026 — 47,383 subscribers9 August 2026 — 47,419 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47,449 subscribers11 August 2026 — 47,439 subscribers12 August 2026 — 47,421 subscribers13 August 2026 — 47,409 subscribers14 August 2026 — 47,398 subscribers16 August 2026 — 47,384 subscribers17 August 2026 — 47,503 subscribers18 August 2026 — 47,514 subscribers19 August 2026 — 47,482 subscribers20 August 2026 — 47,524 subscribers21 August 2026 — 47,656 subscribers23 August 2026 — 47,737 subscribers24 August 2026 — 47,732 subscribers25 August 2026 — 47,722 subscribers26 August 2026 — 47,702 subscribers28 August 2026 — 47,716 subscribers28 August 2026 — 47,835 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net +436. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,315–47,903 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 22:4847,835+119
28 Aug 2026, 00:0747,716+14
26 Aug 2026, 22:5847,702-20
25 Aug 2026, 23:0147,722-10
24 Aug 2026, 22:5947,732-5
23 Aug 2026, 13:0247,737+81
21 Aug 2026, 20:3647,656+132
20 Aug 2026, 18:3647,524+42
19 Aug 2026, 16:5347,482-32
18 Aug 2026, 17:4747,514+11
17 Aug 2026, 14:1847,503+119
16 Aug 2026, 06:4847,384-14
14 Aug 2026, 20:4747,398-11
13 Aug 2026, 11:4747,409-12
12 Aug 2026, 10:4847,421-18
11 Aug 2026, 13:0447,439-10
10 Aug 2026, 11:4347,449+30
9 Aug 2026, 10:0147,419+36
8 Aug 2026, 13:1847,383-9
7 Aug 2026, 15:5447,392first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.6%
avg views ÷ 47,835 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,200
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held40 (28 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total580,510
Reactions total12,093
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
40
Videos
12
Links
191

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15m 52s
Average length
3m 58s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19,663 reactions across 39 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10,35052.6%
🫡4,78524.3%
👍1,4137.19%
🔥8834.49%
💔8804.48%
😢7233.68%
💯3191.62%
960.488%
👌660.336%
👏560.285%
❤‍🔥500.254%
🥰340.173%
🤝80.041%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,395reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
421
across the posts below
Posts paid on
39
of 40 we hold a reading for · 98%
Most on one post
108
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @R1Gaza. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈10,400 views364 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

📢 #ترقبوا.. عبر منصة "رادع" 👈 شهادات حصرية للعائدين من معسكر العصابات العميلة في المنطقة الصفراء شمال قطاع غزة. 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza

229🫡96👍26🔥13

27 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈14,600 views494 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026

📢 "رادع" توقع عددًا من العملاء في كمين شرق الشجاعية 👈 بتاريخ 17 أغسطس 2026، أوقع أبطال قوة "رادع" عددًا من عملاء الاحتلال في كمين قرب شارع مشتهى بحي الشجاعية، شرق مدينة غزة. 👈 وبعد إيقاع إصابات محققة في صفوف العصابات العميلة، أقدم الاحتلال على استهداف أبطالنا بقذائف المدفعية والطيران الحربي، بهدف التغطية على انسحاب العملاء باتجاه معسكر العميل رامي حلس داخل "الخط الأصفر". 👈 وتؤكد "رادع" استمرار ملاحقة العصابات العم

304🫡143🔥28❤‍🔥9👍7👏3

27 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈7,200 views381 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @alhares_1Photo

📌 تصريح أمني.. بشأن تسليم عميل نفسه للأجهزة الأمنية 👈 سلّم أحد العملاء المرتبطين بالاحتلال نفسه للأجهزة الأمنية، بعد تأثره بما ورد في اعترافات العميل م.م، التي سبق أن نُشرت. 👈 ووفق ما سُمح بالكشف عنه، ارتبط العميل بمخابرات الاحتلال بعد قيامه بالتعليق على صفحة "المنسق" في موقع فيسبوك، حيث تلقّى عقب تعليقه مباشرة، اتصالًا من ضابط في مخابرات الاحتلال. سيتم الكشف عن مزيد من التفاصيل لاحقًا. 🏷️ الحارس.. توعية وتحصين ت

246🫡95👍35❤‍🔥5

27 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈7,210 views285 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @alhares_1

#ترقبوا 📌 بعد قليل.. تصريح مهم من أمن المقاومة 🏷️ الحارس.. توعية وتحصين تابع الحارس: t.me/alhares_1

191🫡78👍10🔥6

26 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC≈13,100 views306 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

📢 كيف يوفر الاحتلال الغطاء الأمني للعصابات العميلة؟ 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza

206🫡74👍26

25 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC≈16,800 views345 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

📢 دوافع الالتحاق بالعصابات العميلة؟ 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza

222🫡53👍34🔥15💯14💔7

24 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈16,700 views380 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

📢 ماذا يستفيد الاحتلال من العصابات العميلة؟ 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza

👍221💯68🫡4230💔7😢7👏32

23 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈18,800 views453 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

📢 مهما حاولوا 👈 لن يستطيعوا إخفاء حقيقة السقوط الأخلاقي داخل العصابات العميلة إن كانت الحيوانات تغار على عرضها وشرفها.. فماذا تنتظر أيها العميل!؟ 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza

294💯61🫡55🔥32👍11

22 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈22,600 views491 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

📢 قوة "رادع" توثق شهادات مروعة لفارين من معسكر العصابات العميلة 👈 أدلى الفارون، بتاريخ ٢٢ أغسطس ٢٠٢٦، من معسكر العصابات العميلة بشهادات أولية مروعة حول انتهاكات أخلاقية وعمليات ابتزاز وتعذيب داخل معسكر العملاء. 👈 أفاد أحد الفارين بأن كبار العملاء والمتنفذين في عصابة العميل أشرف المنسي ارتكبوا اعتداءات جنسية جماعية بحق نساء، وأجبروا أزواجهن على مشاهدة ذلك وتوثيقه بالكاميرا. 👈 كما أفادت إحدى الفارات بأنها واجهت خطرً

👍219😢12465🫡41💔23🔥8👌6💯5

21 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC≈29,100 views573 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

📢 بيان مهم 👈 تلقّى أمن المقاومة خلال الساعات الأخيرة اتصالات مكثفة من الراغبين في التوبة، ما تسبب في صعوبة أمنية نتيجة انتشار طائرات الاحتلال وتحليقها المكثف. 👈 وبناءً عليه، تهيب "رادع" بالراغبين في التوبة من العصابات العميلة بالالتزام بالسرية التامة وضبط النفس، وانتظار تعليمات أمن المقاومة. وعدناكم.. قريبًا ستكونون بين أبناء شعبكم 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza

380🫡154👍15👏10🔥73💯3👌1

21 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC≈29,400 views535 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

📢 تتوالي الضربات.. 40 شخصًا يعودون إلى حضن شعبهم 👈 في إطار الجهود الأمنية المكثفة، تمكنت قوة "رادع"، بالتعاون مع الأجهزة الأمنية والعشائر والعائلات، من معالجة عدد من ملفات المنضمين إلى العصابات العميلة، ما أثمر عن تسليم 40 شخصًا أنفسهم وعودتهم إلى حضن شعبهم، بينهم رجال ونساء وأطفال. 👈 وتؤكد "رادع" أن هذه الخطوة جاءت نتيجة متابعة حثيثة وجهود متواصلة، إلى جانب الدور الوطني للعائلات والعشائر في احتواء أبنائها ودفعهم إ

🫡358147👍147🔥7👌2

21 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈35,500 views435 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

📢 مصدر أمني في قوة "رادع": 👈 تعاملنا مع عائلات فارّة من معسكر العصابات العميلة الموجود في المنطقة الصفراء شمال قطاع غزة. 👈 ندعو العائلات العالقة إلى عدم التردد في الخروج الفوري من معسكر العصابات العميلة؛ فشعبكم بانتظاركم. 👈 وتؤكد شهادات أولية للعائلات الفارّة من معسكر العصابات العميلة ارتكاب العملاء فظائع وجرائم أخلاقية وجنائية. 🛡️ رادع.. قوة الميدان تـابـع: t.me/R1Gaza

276🫡115👍25🔥17👌1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @R1Gaza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@R1Gaza edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 3,969 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رادع 🛡️” (@R1Gaza), 47,835 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/R1Gaza.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.