👀👀

Channel
MANKIND‘S BAD HABIT
@RABBIT_OR_HABIT
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
85subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003706442425 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RABBIT_OR_HABIT |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RABBIT_OR_HABIT |
Previous handles
@RABBIT_OR_HABIT was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:19 | 85 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 81 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 83 | +10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 73 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 73 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
158 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5458755643391351080 | 44 | 27.8% | |
| custom 5379895057379779266 | 28 | 17.7% | |
| custom 5289824207293656707 | 26 | 16.5% | |
| custom 6037210321377037820 | 13 | 8.23% | |
| custom 5458760230416440600 | 10 | 6.33% | |
| custom 5425091032595343179 | 9 | 5.70% | |
| custom 5289780965562919384 | 7 | 4.43% | |
| custom 5289919289279656657 | 6 | 3.80% | |
| 😈 | 6 | 3.80% | |
| custom 5427324016157299994 | 4 | 2.53% | |
| 🎃 | 3 | 1.90% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 1.27% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⭐⭐❤️ 🔤нимание 🔤ью-🔤орк! ⭐️стали от газет, что только и строчат о героях хвалебные статьи? Хотите узнать, что они на самом деле из себя представляют? «Миру нужен тот, кто сорвет маски с этих ничтожеств!» – Дж. Джона Джеймсон. #️⃣ 🔤обро пожаловать в ⭐⭐ ⭐ ⭐«Daily Bugle»! 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ ⭐️ы, ваши верные слуги, откопали из глубин интернета личные каналы паразитов-героев и не только!…
custom 52898242072936567072
ADM: держу в курсе, товарищи, мой второй канал за Худи из мраморных шершней. Кому интересно— можете почитать :)
custom 52898242072936567075custom 54587556433913510802custom 53798950573797792661custom 54587602304164406001
УВЛЕКАТЕЛЬНО НАБЛЮДАТЬ ЗА МЕСТНОЙ ФАУНОЙ.
custom 53798950573797792661custom 54587602304164406001
👀👀
:D.
File, posted without a caption
custom 53798950573797792665custom 54587556433913510803👻1
👀👀
🐇: – господи боже, плесень, ну не позорься. Вот, почитай, вникни, и расскажи, что ты думаешь по поводу того, что люди представляют, пишут и рисуют такое с тобой и другими огрызками БЛЯТЬ, И ВЫ СЕРЬЕЗНО ХОТЕЛИ СПРОСИТЬ У МЕНЯ ИМЕННО ЭТО? КРОЛИКИ, ДА ВЫ СОВСЕМ ПОТЕРЯННЫЕ. НЕТ, ЕСЛИ СЕРЬЁЗНО, ЭТА ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ ЗВУЧИТ ПИЗДЕЦ СМЕШНО. НО МНЕ АБСОЛЮТНО НЕТ ДЕЛА ДО ТОГО, ЧЕМ МАЯТСЯ 13-ЛЕТНИЕ ДЕВОЧКИ И КАКИЕ У НИХ ТАМ ВЛАЖНЫЕ…
custom 528982420729365670711😈6custom 54587556433913510805custom 54273240161572999943🎃2custom 54587602304164406002custom 52897809655629193841custom 53798950573797792661
ADM: внимание, впредь на полную бессмыслицу отвечать не буду, спасибо за внимание
custom 54250910325953431797custom 53798950573797792661
🐇: – здарова, отбитый. Как относишься к пейрингам с собой по типу Винни/Хэбит, Обсервер/Хебит и т.д. И как относишься к селфшиперам? (Когда людишки шипперят себя с тобой) И ЧЁ ЭТА ХУЙНЯ ДОЛЖНА ОБОЗНАЧАТЬ? ПРЕЖДЕ ЧЕМ ЧТО-ТО СПРОСИТЬ ВЫРАЖАЙТЕСЬ НОРМАЛЬНЫМ ЯЗЫКОМ, ВЫРАЖАЙТЕСЬ НОРМАЛЬНЫМ ЯЗЫКОМ, А НЕ ГИКОВСКИМ СЛЕНГОМ.
custom 545875564339135108010custom 53798950573797792666custom 52898242072936567071
🐇: Короче Хэбит Если бы оказался в данганронпе что бы ты выбрал: отчаяние, надежду или ложь? 🐇: А правда что у тебя труханы в сердечко? 🐇: Я срал в зелёный носок 25 лет Пришло время признаться, возможно, мой старший сын наичнает что-то подозревать В это воскресенье его посадили на дилдак на пару месяцев Но мы стали буквально неразлучными друзьями Сегодня утром я встал пошёл на кухню отрезать яйца, это войдёт в ист…
custom 53798950573797792667custom 52899192892796566576custom 54587556433913510804👻1custom 60372103213770378201
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @RABBIT_OR_HABIT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@RABBIT_OR_HABIT named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MANKIND‘S BAD HABIT” (@RABBIT_OR_HABIT), 85 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RABBIT_OR_HABIT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.