Channel
RBCs Med Hama 2025
@RBCs_Med_Hama_2025
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,086subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001254302011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RBCs_Med_Hama_2025 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RBCs_Med_Hama_2025 |
Topic
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 7 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 00:56 | 1,086 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:41 | 1,088 | +2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:21 | 1,086 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:59 | 1,088 | +1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 1,087 | +1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:15 | 1,086 | +3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:49 | 1,083 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:20 | 1,085 | +1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 07:50 | 1,084 | -1 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 00:01 | 1,085 | +2 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 1,083 | no change |
| 4 Oct 2026, 21:58 | 1,083 | -2 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 1,085 | +3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:47 | 1,082 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@clinicalcase3 · 21,135
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
@german90gooo · 30,906
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RBCs Med Hama 2025” (@RBCs_Med_Hama_2025), 1,086 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RBCs_Med_Hama_2025.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.