Update done โ๏ธ
โค4

Channel
@ROHITCHEATC
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
6,927subscribers
-434 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002050478022 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ROHITCHEATC |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ROHITCHEATC |
Gaming โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:06 | 6,927 | -18 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 20:07 | 6,945 | -39 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:34 | 6,984 | -28 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:20 | 7,012 | -19 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 7,031 | -28 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:16 | 7,059 | +35 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 7,024 | -29 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:49 | 7,053 | -41 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 14:30 | 7,094 | -68 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:59 | 7,162 | -104 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 7,266 | -116 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 7,382 | -54 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 7,436 | -54 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 7,490 | -17 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 7,507 | -42 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:04 | 7,549 | -54 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 7,603 | -76 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 7,679 | +49 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 7,630 | +454 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 7,176 | first reading |
76 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 76 (3 August 2026 โ 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 602 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
177 reactions across 48 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 149 | 84.2% | |
| ๐ | 12 | 6.78% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 9 | 5.08% | |
| ๐ฅด | 4 | 2.26% | |
| ๐ฅ | 2 | 1.13% | |
| ๐ณ | 1 | 0.565% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Update done โ๏ธ
โค4
โ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ง๐๐ โฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟ ๐ฐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ ๐ข สแดแดแด sสแดแด สแดแดแด: ๐ท๐ถ๐ถ% ๐ฐ ๐ข แดษชแดสแดแดแด ๐ท๐ถ๐ถ% ๐ฐ ๐ข แดษชแด าแดแด ๐ฐ ๐ข แดsแด สแดแดแดแดษชแดษด ๐ฐ ๐ข แดsแด ษดแดแดแด สแดx ๐ฐ ๐ขษดแดษด - สแดแดแด ๊ฑแด๊ฐแด แดกแดสแดษชษดษข ๐ฐ โฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟ โก๏ธ ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐จ๐ฃ :- ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฒ ! ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ โถ๏ธ โฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟโฟ โก๏ธ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ง ๐๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฆ๐ โ ๐@ROHITCHEAT๐ โก๏ธ ๐ฃ๐๐ฌ๐ ๐๐ก๐ง ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐ข๐๐ฆ โ ๐ง๐๐ฃ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ โ
โค5๐ฅด1
NO ROOT SOON IN A FEW MINIUTS
โค2
APK ROOT๐ฎ๐ถ
ROOT VERSHION AND NO ROOT VERSION SOONโ ROOT VERSHION - FUNTHION DRAG HEAD 100% + FULL BODY HOLOGRAMโ NO ROOT VERSION - FUNTHION 2. DEV MODE 3. PC LOGO 4. ALL EMOTES 5. WORK ONLINE MATCHMAKING 6. NO WAY TO BAN 7. All Evo Unlocked (visual only) โ๏ธ
โค6๐1
No root need?๐
2. DEV MODE 3. PC LOGO 4. ALL EMOTES 5. WORK ONLINE MATCHMAKING 6. NO WAY TO BAN 7. All Evo Unlocked (visual only)
Your device root or no root?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Important voice
โค1
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ข๐ก ๐ฅ๐ข๐ข๐ง ๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ โพ๏ธDRAG HEADSHOT โญ๏ธ โพ๏ธNO LOCATION/NPC NAME LOCATION ๐ โพ๏ธMAIN ID SAFE ๐ โพ๏ธNO RECONNECT ๐ โพ๏ธNO BAN โค๏ธโ๐ฅ โพ๏ธNO BLACKLIST ๐ฅ โพ๏ธNO VPN ๐ฏ โพ๏ธINDIA SERVER WORK ๐ฎ๐ณ ๏ปฟ โ๏ธ PRICE - 299 RS (7 DAYS) โ๏ธ ๏ปฟ TO BUY - @ROHITCHEATโ
โค2
Frist 5 members ko 250rs 7days ka da dunga dm fast
๐๐ฅ๐๐ฃ-๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ง ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ โพ๏ธDRAG HEADSHOT โญ๏ธ โพ๏ธNO LOCATION/NPC NAME LOCATION ๐ โพ๏ธMAIN ID SAFE ๐ โพ๏ธNO RECONNECT ๐ โพ๏ธNO BAN โค๏ธโ๐ฅ โพ๏ธNO BLACKLIST ๐ฅ โพ๏ธNO VPN ๐ฏ โพ๏ธINDIA SERVER WORK ๐ฎ๐ณ ๏ปฟ โ๏ธ PRICE - 299 RS (7 DAYS) โ๏ธ ๏ปฟ TO BUY - @ROHITCHEAT โ
Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @ROHITCHEATC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @ROHITCHEATC as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Your device root or no root?
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ROHITCHEATC named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฉ ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ง ๐๐ ๐ข๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ง๐ข๐ฅ๐โ (@ROHITCHEATC), 6,927 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ROHITCHEATC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.