Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نـفـحـــاتً ربـانـيــةه 🤎.

Channel

نـفـحـــاتً ربـانـيــةه 🤎.

@RR2G50

On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,364subscribers

-111 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001207604813
TypeChannel
Username@RR2G50
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RR2G50

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

13.7 average views per post against 13,364 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.103%. Across the 5,210 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.41% and 12.8%, with a median of 6.52%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (11 August 2026 10 September 2026)
Posts measured148 of 148 published in the window (148 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,032
Mature posts only0.992% over 13 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,364 measured 7 September 2026
Cohortb10000:ara · 5,210 channels · p10 0.77% · p25 2.41% · p50 6.52% · p75 12.8% · p90 21.8%
Position in cohort0.941th percentile · 1/63 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.216% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 10 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

13,36413,48113,422.58 August 2026 — 13,475 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,481 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,477 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,474 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,465 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,463 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,447 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,480 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,457 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,467 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,458 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,469 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,454 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,453 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,425 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,424 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,402 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,418 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,404 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,409 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,389 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,393 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,386 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,371 subscribers7 September 2026 — 13,364 subscribers8 August 20267 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 31 days, net -111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,346–13,499 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 15:4113,364-7
4 Sept 2026, 19:3613,371-15
3 Sept 2026, 01:3713,386-7
1 Sept 2026, 22:5613,393+4
31 Aug 2026, 20:5613,389-20
30 Aug 2026, 18:2613,409+5
28 Aug 2026, 14:3413,404-14
27 Aug 2026, 15:3713,418+16
26 Aug 2026, 17:5513,402-22
25 Aug 2026, 18:4513,424-1
24 Aug 2026, 19:1413,425-28
23 Aug 2026, 05:0513,453-1
21 Aug 2026, 14:4513,454-15
20 Aug 2026, 14:1413,469+11
19 Aug 2026, 16:2613,458-9
18 Aug 2026, 14:2413,467+10
17 Aug 2026, 15:0813,457-23
16 Aug 2026, 08:5313,480+33
14 Aug 2026, 19:1313,447-16
13 Aug 2026, 08:1413,463first reading

Engagement

207 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.103%
avg views ÷ 13,364 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.7
148 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
148
of 207 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held207 (14 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total2,032
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:46 UTC2 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

‏بسرعةةة خش يسكر انت واطلب انضمامك قبل اي حد 🎼😂❤️🙈 Sounds and ringtones for ur phone ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🎧

2 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC2 viewsread 2 September 2026

جبلتكُم مجلد لطف إللي طلبتوها مني كثير♥🤭 https://t.me/addlist/jsfiY6Pi82Q4YTVk مَليان صُور حِلوة كأنّها إلكُم ومِن تصويركُم

2 Sept 2026, 06:46 UTC1 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

‏بسرعةةة خش يسكر انت واطلب انضمامك قبل اي حد 🎼😂❤️🙈 Sounds and ringtones for ur phone ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🎧

1 Sept 2026, 15:16 UTC1 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

‏بسرعةةة خش يسكر انت واطلب انضمامك قبل اي حد 🎼😂❤️🙈 Sounds and ringtones for ur phone ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🎧

1 Sept 2026, 15:15 UTC1 viewsread 1 September 2026

ليسـت مجـرد قنـوات عابِـره🥀.. هنـا ستـجد كـل ما يلامـس قلبـك ويطمئنـك💗🥀. أسرعـوا في الإنضمــام لعهـا تكون سبب في هداية أحدهم💗🥀. https://t.me/addlist/0TW1-FWLzzw5MGRk

1 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC36 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

‏بسرعةةة خش يسكر انت واطلب انضمامك قبل اي حد 🎼😂❤️🙈 Sounds and ringtones for ur phone ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🎧

Showing the 12 most recent of 207 posts we hold for @RR2G50. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

صديقي 𖤍
@friend0i0 · 98,990
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 15 August 2026
عجائب وغرائب وحقائق
@ppppdu · 178,747
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نـفـحـــاتً ربـانـيــةه 🤎.” (@RR2G50), 13,364 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RR2G50.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.