Channel
@RY_520
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
776subscribers
+193 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002472549691 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RY_520 |
| Created | 17 November 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RY_520 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 776 | -27 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 803 | +280 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 523 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 528 | -46 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 574 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 583 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 583 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2024 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
TG福利频道｜群组精选 AD：菜鸟云千兆高速一元机场 👉送小火箭id AD：🔥女网红线下被榜一偷拍 AD：🔥媚黑绿帽BBC NTR原创首发 1： 染月的文案馆 2： 海角社区/全站资源免费看 3： 捷克街头（欧美 黑人） 4： 肤白貌美大长腿气质佳在线裸聊👄👄 5： 骚气小姐姐在线裸聊一对一👄 6： 激情四射免费在线匹配裸聊一对一❤️❤️❤️ 7： 澳门六合#资料免费公开 8： 文爱妹妹在线激情裸聊💋💋 9： 嘉嘉❤️线上 裸聊一对一视频 听话听指挥欲女 10： 在线裸聊一对一👅包射包爽歪歪 11： 专业线上裸聊一对一服务👀 12： 菲菲裸聊馆在线接性感裸聊一对一🤞🤞🤞 13： 御女宫 日本AV 14： 新澳门六合#资料免费公开 15： 大奶炮激情澎湃裸聊一对一👅 16： 语音萝莉裸聊一对一服务包满意👅👅 17： 纯欲爆棚萝莉在线裸聊💅🏼 18： 爽翻天妹妹在线视频裸聊👄等你来哟 Ad：🔥海角社区连载完整版🔥母子乱伦…
我的心是一个站牌 上面写着等待.
❤1
染月的文案馆 pinned Deleted message
要赚多少人血馒头才能变成我们.
File, posted without a caption
👍2
晚安 各位.晚安 我的一个亿
苦难我都往死里扛 谁对谁错我都认 我永远不会倒 因为我是不死鸟.
我总纠结那段时光 可我忘了 对你而言那只是一段随意割舍的记忆.
❤3👍2
我应该是一棵参天大树 不需要靠山 也不能哭哭啼啼 能遮住所有苦难.
打败异地恋的究竟是人还是距离.
可惜爱不是三言两语 我也不再是十七八岁.
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @RY_520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@RY_520 named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“染月的文案馆” (@RY_520), 776 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RY_520.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.