Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رادیو رابطه

Channel

رادیو رابطه

@RadioRabte

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,889subscribers

-107 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001312327560
TypeChannel
Username@RadioRabte
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RadioRabte

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,88911,99611,942.57 August 2026 — 11,996 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,996 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,988 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,982 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,969 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,967 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,963 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,962 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,952 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,941 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,926 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,920 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,918 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,913 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,909 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,897 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,972 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,964 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,979 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,975 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,972 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,961 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,949 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,935 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,929 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,916 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,910 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,900 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,889 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net -107. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,873–12,012 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 22:3911,889-11
9 Sept 2026, 12:2011,900-10
6 Sept 2026, 08:1511,910-6
4 Sept 2026, 00:3711,916-13
2 Sept 2026, 15:3511,929-6
1 Sept 2026, 14:4211,935-14
31 Aug 2026, 13:5811,949-12
30 Aug 2026, 12:5311,961-11
29 Aug 2026, 09:3411,972-3
28 Aug 2026, 10:1111,975-4
27 Aug 2026, 12:5711,979+15
26 Aug 2026, 15:3211,964-8
25 Aug 2026, 12:0311,972+75
24 Aug 2026, 14:3611,897-12
22 Aug 2026, 18:4911,909-4
21 Aug 2026, 07:0511,913-5
19 Aug 2026, 07:1911,918-2
18 Aug 2026, 08:0311,920-6
17 Aug 2026, 11:1711,926-15
15 Aug 2026, 18:5611,941first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.93%
avg views ÷ 11,889 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held63 (18 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total36,117
Reactions total618
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,317 reactions across 63 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
56743.1%
👍26920.4%
💔14911.3%
👎1279.64%
😭534.02%
🗿322.43%
😁171.29%
😍171.29%
💯161.21%
👀141.06%
😨141.06%
🤨141.06%
😘70.532%
🆒60.456%
🌚60.456%
🥰40.304%
🫡30.228%
🤗20.152%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,317 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 06:31 UTC324 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Voice message

چطور فرد مناسبی رو برای ازدواج و رابطه عاطفی پیدا کنم؟ - @RadioRabte

6

1 Sept 2026, 18:12 UTC407 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026

عزیزای دلم مراقب خودتون باشید 🥹

💔9😨2

1 Sept 2026, 16:58 UTC457 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

تا ابد انتخابتون: آدمى باشه كه اولويتش باشيد آدمى باشه كه براتون توضيح بده آدمى باشه كه نگه داشتن و بلد باشه آدمى باشه كه فرق شما با بقيه رو بدونه آدمى باشه كه ناراحتى شما براش مهم باشه آدمى باشه كه خواسته هاتونو كوچیک نشمره ~ @RadioRabte

14

31 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC532 views17 reactionsread 2 September 2026

نت شماهم ضعیفه ؟👀 هیچی برام بالا نمیاد !

👍132👎2

30 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC793 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026

به دليل شرايط موجود در كشور متاسفانه با موجى از اضطراب، افسردگی و فرسودگی رواني مواجه هستيم... - (قبلا فقط طلا بود که قیمتش رو لحظه ای چک میکردن الان میری ساده ترین چیزو بگیری میگن صبر کن قیمت جدید رو ببینم!)

💔22😭73

30 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC797 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Voice message

چطوری متوجه بشیم نیمکت ذخیره ینفریم؟ - @RadioRabte

8

30 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC766 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026

📜هر موقع داشتی با شريک عاطفيت دعوا مى كردى، قبل از اينكه جوابش رو بدى، این پنج نكته رو به خودت یادآوری كن... -اين آدمى كه دارم باهاش بحث میكنم، دشمنم نيست؛ يكى از عزيزترين آدم هاى زندگی منه ( قبل از جواب دادن، يادت بياد هدفت حفظ رابطه ست، نه شكست دادن طرف مقابل) - الان چون عصبانی ام ، ممكنه همه چیز رو بدتر از چیزی كه هست ببینیم! - اينكه با هم بحث مى كنيم، به اين معنى نيست كه رابطه مون خيلى بده ( دنبال حذف اختلاف نب

15

27 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC951 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Voice message

🔖 سه باور نادرست در مورد ازدواج : - @RadioRabte

11

27 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC≈1,010 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🌱خيلى وقت ها چون از يكى خوشمون مياد، فكر مى كنيم حتماً آدم مناسبى براى ماست این ۴نشونه كمک میكنه قبل از جدى شدن رابطه، بسنجى كسى كه باهاش آشنا شدى واقعاً برات مناسبه يا نه!؟ - فقط نبين چقدر دوستش دارى؛ ببين كنار اون چه آدمى میشى؟آيا میتونى خودت باشى؟ راحت حرف بزنى؟ مخالفت كنى؟ يا مدام دارى خودت رو سانسور مى كنى كه رابطه خراب نشه؟ - به حرف هاش كمتر، به الگوی رفتارش بيشتر توجه كن ، آدمها ممكنه خيلى قشنگ درباره احترام،

16

26 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC883 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

بقیه پیامارو فردا شب میزارم♥️ - گاهی وقتا میبینیم مشکل وجود داره ...اما به سمت درمانش نمیریم چون با خودمون میگیم ( بریم جلو ببینیم چی میشه) خیلی وقتا با مراجعه به روانشناس از خیلی مشکلات بین فردی میشه رهایی پیدا کرد🌱 ~ @RadioRabte

6👍2

26 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC837 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026

خب بین اینهمه اعتراف من دارم تلاش میکنم همسرم رو برای تولدش سوپرایز کنممم و به کسی نگفتم تو دلم مونده امیدوارم بتونم سوپرایزش کنم و از پسش بربیامم🥹🤍

😍172👍2

26 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC795 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026

از اینک تنوع طلبم اذیتم همزمان با یکی بعنوان دوست پسرم حرف میزنم با یکی ازدواجیم بایکی برا س.ک.س چتیم با یکی فقط دوستم اخر سرم از هیچکدومشون راضی نیستم

💔10😨8👀3👎3🗿1

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @RadioRabte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رادیو رابطه” (@RadioRabte), 11,889 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RadioRabte.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.