Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RandheerSinghSir

Channel

RandheerSinghSir

@RandheerSIQ

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,113subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002001156495
TypeChannel
Username@RandheerSIQ
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RandheerSIQ

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,1123,1343,12323 August 2026 — 3,134 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,133 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,125 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,123 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,120 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,116 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,112 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,113 subscribers3,11323 August 202615 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 23 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,109–3,137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 21:573,113+1
11 Sept 2026, 20:193,112-4
6 Sept 2026, 22:403,116-4
2 Sept 2026, 18:573,120-3
30 Aug 2026, 18:583,123-2
27 Aug 2026, 18:543,125-8
24 Aug 2026, 10:553,133-1
23 Aug 2026, 17:453,134first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5651.4%
🙏1917.4%
🔥76.42%
🤣76.42%
🤔65.50%
🤷‍♀65.50%
😁21.83%
😨21.83%
🫡21.83%
🌚10.917%
🤮10.917%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 24 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 May 2026, 13:13 UTC≈2,110 views10 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Coming back soon with full proof evidences

🤣7😁21

24 May 2026, 13:12 UTC≈2,130 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026

M sure more than 20 questions are asked directly from my classes

4

24 May 2026, 13:12 UTC≈2,130 views6 reactionsread 23 August 2026

3 questions of geography direct from my class

6

24 May 2026, 12:53 UTC≈2,170 views2 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Discussed AI impact summit consecutively for three days

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @RandheerSIQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CSLIVE Group_UPSC
@cslivegroup · 55,743
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RandheerSinghSir” (@RandheerSIQ), 3,113 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RandheerSIQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.