Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рарог

Channel

Рарог

@Rarog_24OMBr

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

442subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002269962645
TypeChannel
Username@Rarog_24OMBr
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rarog_24OMBr

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

431442436.56 August 2026 — 431 subscribers6 August 2026 — 431 subscribers18 August 2026 — 436 subscribers26 August 2026 — 434 subscribers10 September 2026 — 439 subscribers18 September 2026 — 442 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 43 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 429–444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:59442+3
10 Sept 2026, 08:59439+5
26 Aug 2026, 00:04434-2
18 Aug 2026, 18:57436+5
6 Aug 2026, 19:19431no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:16431first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

98 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5859.2%
❤1717.3%
👍1616.3%
❤‍🔥66.12%
🕊11.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC82 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rarog_427Video

Філігранна робота операторів 427 Окремої бригади безпілотних систем «Рарог» «Бо все тимчасове, а мавік… мавік вічний» Instagram | X | YouTube | Facebook | Стань частиною "РАРОГ" | Дія | LobbyX | TikTok | Сайт

❤2🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC176 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @robert_magyarVideo

Хробачий Мі-28 «Нічний мисливець» писком до грунту. Птахи СБС 427 обр «Рарог» 10:00, Білгородська обл, рф р-н нп Вязове Онлайн-табло СБС «ПІДРАХУЙКА» https://sbs-group.army/ МАДЯР🇺🇦 15.07.26 🔵МАДЯР🎞МАДЯР👥МАДЯР 👥RB📷МАДЯР 🇺🇦СБС онлайн«ПІДРАХУЙКА»СБС

👍5❤‍🔥2

8 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC228 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @usf_armyVideo

💥 Оператори Сил безпілотних систем за одну ніч уразили 8 танкерів тіньового флоту рф У ніч на 7 липня оператори підрозділу «Кайрос» 414-ї окремої бригади «Птахи Мадяра» завдали ударів по групі морських суден противника в акваторії Азовського моря. Уражено вісім танкерів, які транспортували паливо на тимчасово окуповану територію АР Крим. Усі танкери ідентифіковані та перебувають під міжнародними санкціями. Судна ма…

❤3

10 Jun 2026, 18:00 UTC381 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @usf_armyVideo

🔥 СБС уразили КСП «Рубікону», пункт дислокації, РЛС, логістичні та інші ключові цілі противника У ніч з 8 на 9 червня підрозділи Сил безпілотних систем відпрацювали 36 військових та інфраструктурних об’єктів противника в оперативній глибині на тимчасово окупованих територіях. Розповідаємо детальніше про результати операцій. • У Запорізькій області оператори 9-го батальйону «Кайрос» 414-ї бригади «Птахи Мадяра» ура…

🔥3

5 Jun 2026, 18:33 UTC375 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rarog_427Video

Наша розвідка наводить жах у будь-яку пору року, в будь-який час доби. Бо все тимчасове, а мавік… мавік вічний. Ми їх бачимо. І ми їх знищимо. Instagram | X | YouTube | Facebook | Стань частиною "РАРОГ" | Дія | LobbyX | TikTok | Сайт

🔥5

28 May 2026, 06:54 UTC438 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rarog_427Video

Вампіристи «Рарогу» наводять жах на армію країни-гною не лише вночі, а цілодобово. Ми їх бачимо! І ми їх знищимо! Бо в Україні червоне — це любов ♥️ , а не кров. Instagram | X | YouTube | Facebook | Стань частиною "РАРОГ" | Дія | LobbyX | TikTok | Сайт

🔥4❤1

18 May 2026, 18:28 UTC468 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rarog_427Video

Бог грому? Ні. Це ще одна успішно знищена ціль «крил» «Рарогу». Добірка якісної роботи та жирних уражень. Насолоджуйтесь. Ми їх бачимо. І ми їх знищимо! Instagram | X | YouTube | Facebook | Стань частиною "РАРОГ" | Дія | LobbyX | TikTok | Сайт

👍4

12 May 2026, 15:23 UTC513 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @official24ombrVideo

Знищили колону окупантів! На підходах до Часового Яру підрозділи 24 ОМБр імені короля Данила у взаємодії з 427 бригадою БПС «РАРОГ» відпрацювали по піхоті противника. Понад 20 росіян рухались відкрито зі сторони Бахмута. Розвідка виявила, артилерія та дрони — розібрали. Відпрацювали злагоджено. Цікавий момент: на відео є кадри з GoPro самих росіян — де можна оцінити їхні враження від такого ураження. Працюємо🫡 С…

🔥6

9 May 2026, 09:42 UTC420 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rarog_427Video

Свіжак знищеної сили противника від мавікістів Рарогу!💪 Бо все тимчасове, а мавік… мавік вічний!❤️‍🔥 Захисти своє — літай разом з нами! Instagram | X | YouTube | Facebook | Стань частиною "РАРОГ" | Дія | LobbyX | TikTok | Сайт

👍4

6 May 2026, 08:00 UTC430 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rarog_427Video

Форсаж. Пригоди. Відплата. FPV. Скучили? Ловіть добірку годних уражень окупантського сміття. Захисти своє — літай разом з нами! Instagram | X | YouTube | Facebook | Стань частиною "РАРОГ" | Дія | LobbyX | TikTok | Сайт

🔥4

5 May 2026, 18:01 UTC369 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rarog_427Video

3, 2, 1 — БАМ 💥🔥🚀 Триста і двісті мають бути тільки орки. Нова порція уражень від «Рарога». Захисти своє — літай разом з нами! Instagram | X | YouTube | Facebook | Стань частиною "РАРОГ" | Дія | LobbyX | TikTok | Сайт

🔥3

5 May 2026, 16:20 UTC321 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rarog_427Video

Ми їх бачимо і ми їх знищимо. Працюють вампіристи Рарогу. Бо червоне в Україні — то любов, а не кров! Instagram | X | YouTube | Facebook | Стань частиною "РАРОГ" | Дія | LobbyX | TikTok | Сайт

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Rarog_24OMBr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

24th Mechanized Brigade (Ukraine) (en.wikipedia.org)
“…|title=«РАРОГ» батальйон безпілотних авіаційних комплексів 24 ОМБр |url=https://t.me/Rarog_24OMBr |access-date=2024-07-22 |website=Telegram |language=uk}}…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рарог” (@Rarog_24OMBr), 442 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rarog_24OMBr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.