Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📚𝐑𝐚𝐲𝐚.𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬📚

Channel

📚𝐑𝐚𝐲𝐚.𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬📚

@RayaBooks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,866subscribers

+367 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002159757728
TypeChannel
Username@RayaBooks
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RayaBooks

Growth

8,4998,8668,682.57 August 2026 — 8,499 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,499 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,502 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,531 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,567 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,554 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,649 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,701 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,803 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,866 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 25 days, net +367. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,444–8,921 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 07:288,866+63
29 Aug 2026, 12:048,803+102
26 Aug 2026, 11:038,701+52
23 Aug 2026, 16:478,649+95
20 Aug 2026, 11:218,554-13
17 Aug 2026, 10:558,567+36
14 Aug 2026, 03:298,531+29
10 Aug 2026, 16:228,502+3
7 Aug 2026, 21:058,499no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:318,499first reading

Engagement

86 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 8,866 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 86 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 71 of 76 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held86 (28 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total95,806
Reactions total1,494
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,783 reactions across 77 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
98355.1%
❤‍🔥48627.3%
🔥1769.87%
💔502.80%
🥰351.96%
😢90.505%
💋80.449%
🍓70.393%
💅70.393%
🥴70.393%
💘60.337%
😈30.168%
🙊20.112%
10.056%
10.056%
😨10.056%
🤩10.056%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,783 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC78 viewsread 28 August 2026

Скоро удалю успейте подписаться!!!

28 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC81 viewsread 28 August 2026

Добро пожаловать в уютный книжный канал где есть все: книги, распаковки, интервью с авторами, трекеры по книгам, отзывы, новинки, розыгрыши. Вместе будем обсуждать книги, делиться впечатлениями и находить новые истории для души. Присоединяйся, ведьмочка, тебе здесь точно понравится! 🐱

28 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC378 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Фиктивный брак, где между двумя врагами, объединёнными местью, вспыхивает огонь страсти. 🌟

1

28 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC594 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Момент из книги🖤👇🏻 Боль — мой язык — Лириен Кейл

14❤‍🔥3

28 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC660 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Твой книжный уголок: читаем в удовольствие, без критики

1

27 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,160 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📚:Едва дыша 👤:К. Г. Ройсс • Мафия • Месть • Морально серый герой • Предательство и разоблачение • Любовь вопреки ненависти 👉🏻ФАЙЛ КНИГИ👈🏻

❤‍🔥186💋1

27 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,300 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Есть место на рекламу 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 Лс:@RayaRyn

5

26 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC294 viewsread 27 August 2026

прекрасный канал с файлами, розыгрышами и очень интересными книгами, подписывайтесь скорее, всем советую ❤️❤️

26 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC≈1,400 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🌚🐱🐼🦋 Владелец!Никак не могу найти книгу,где девушка перешла в универ и чтобы ее приняли типо в компанию, ей нужно было выполнять закрытыми глазами,что ли ,действие поцелуй и она поцеловала парня и там типо его девушка сидела, честно не помню,но буду ОЧЕНЬ благодарна если хоть кто-то найдет))Это трилогия или биология ,я забыла,но книга очень сильно запомнилось моментами ,я аж плакала ,но прочитала очень давно и конечн

2

26 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC721 views3 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Тянет на тёмные романы? Где герои с причудами, а любовь — это поле боя. Здесь про это. Заходи.

2🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC876 views5 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Дарк-романы. Одержимость, токсичные отношения, запретная химия. Глубже, чем кажется. Разбираем здесь.

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @RayaBooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@RayaBooks edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 06:17 UTCAnonymous Poll382 voters

Книга на вечер📚

  1. #ЛюбовьНенависть49%
  2. Маленькая Жизнь9%
  3. Эффект Грэхема44%
  4. Она мне не сестра10%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📚𝐑𝐚𝐲𝐚.𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬📚” (@RayaBooks), 8,866 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RayaBooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.