Скоро удалю успейте подписаться!!!

Channel
📚𝐑𝐚𝐲𝐚.𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬📚
@RayaBooks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
8,866subscribers
+367 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002159757728 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RayaBooks |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RayaBooks |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:28 | 8,866 | +63 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 8,803 | +102 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 8,701 | +52 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 8,649 | +95 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:21 | 8,554 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 8,567 | +36 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:29 | 8,531 | +29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 8,502 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 8,499 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 8,499 | first reading |
Engagement
86 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.2%
- avg views ÷ 8,866 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,260
- 76 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.57%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 80
- of 86 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 71 of 76 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 86 (28 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 95,806 |
| Reactions total | 1,494 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,783 reactions across 77 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 983 | 55.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 486 | 27.3% | |
| 🔥 | 176 | 9.87% | |
| 💔 | 50 | 2.80% | |
| 🥰 | 35 | 1.96% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 0.505% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 0.449% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 0.393% | |
| 💅 | 7 | 0.393% | |
| 🥴 | 7 | 0.393% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 0.337% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 0.168% | |
| 🙊 | 2 | 0.112% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.056% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.056% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.056% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.056% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,783 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Добро пожаловать в уютный книжный канал где есть все: книги, распаковки, интервью с авторами, трекеры по книгам, отзывы, новинки, розыгрыши. Вместе будем обсуждать книги, делиться впечатлениями и находить новые истории для души. Присоединяйся, ведьмочка, тебе здесь точно понравится! 🐱
Фиктивный брак, где между двумя врагами, объединёнными местью, вспыхивает огонь страсти. 🌟
❤1
Момент из книги🖤👇🏻 Боль — мой язык — Лириен Кейл
❤14❤🔥3
Твой книжный уголок: читаем в удовольствие, без критики
❤1
Интервью с авторами ®️
❤2
📚:Едва дыша 👤:К. Г. Ройсс • Мафия • Месть • Морально серый герой • Предательство и разоблачение • Любовь вопреки ненависти 👉🏻ФАЙЛ КНИГИ👈🏻
❤🔥18❤6💋1
Есть место на рекламу 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 Лс:@RayaRyn
❤5
прекрасный канал с файлами, розыгрышами и очень интересными книгами, подписывайтесь скорее, всем советую ❤️❤️
🌚🐱🐼🦋 Владелец!Никак не могу найти книгу,где девушка перешла в универ и чтобы ее приняли типо в компанию, ей нужно было выполнять закрытыми глазами,что ли ,действие поцелуй и она поцеловала парня и там типо его девушка сидела, честно не помню,но буду ОЧЕНЬ благодарна если хоть кто-то найдет))Это трилогия или биология ,я забыла,но книга очень сильно запомнилось моментами ,я аж плакала ,но прочитала очень давно и конечн…
❤2
Тянет на тёмные романы? Где герои с причудами, а любовь — это поле боя. Здесь про это. Заходи.
❤2🔥1
Дарк-романы. Одержимость, токсичные отношения, запретная химия. Глубже, чем кажется. Разбираем здесь.
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @RayaBooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@RayaBooks edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Книга на вечер📚
- #ЛюбовьНенависть49%
- Маленькая Жизнь9%
- Эффект Грэхема44%
- Она мне не сестра10%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@rayabookss · 95420 posts𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔.𝚘𝚋𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚍
@book_obsessed_4u · 7,4975 postsБудни читающей мамы
@kr_book · 3,7085 posts𝒂𝒎𝒘𝒃𝒐𝒐𝒌♡
@amwbook · 10,8234 posts𝐌.𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬ꨄ︎
@absoonnnn · 9,6223 postsтемная лисичка
@darklisichka · 3,0643 posts𝑊𝑖𝑡𝑐ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑜𝑜𝑘𝑠 ꨄ︎
@Witchofbookss · 3,7233 posts𝕷𝖎𝖇𝖗𝖆𝖗𝖞_𝖔𝖋_𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖐𝖘
@boookkkssss · 1,4972 postsВаша Ханна Форс🫦
@hannafors · 5072 postsAnni Jewelry💍
@Anni_Jewelry · 181 postРедакция Мейнстрим (Mainstream)
@ast_mainstream · 21,5361 postℂ𝕙𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕜_𝕔𝕙𝕖𝕣𝕥𝕚𝕜𝕠𝕧
@cherdak_chertikov · 1791 postНежные книжные💛🪽✨
@daryanemkchat · 11,6411 postDARYANEMK - LIFE BOOK STYLE
@daryanemklife · 27,0331 post𝔞𝔡𝔢𝔩𝔦𝔫𝔢 𝔯𝔢𝔦𝔩𝔩𝛾
@deacon7con · 1,4991 post𝐈𝐬𝐚𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐚 𝐁𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤 & 𝐦𝐢𝐫𝐚.𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐞 | Авторы
@naruschavshie · 8101 postочень приятно, вероника десмонд
@veronica_desmond · 4,3341 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📚𝐑𝐚𝐲𝐚.𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬📚” (@RayaBooks), 8,866 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RayaBooks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.