Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rayo Misterioso 👁️

Channel

Rayo Misterioso 👁️

@Rayomisterioso8

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

11,628subscribers

+155 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003144341515
TypeChannel
Username@Rayomisterioso8
DescriptionLa Narrativa del Control 🔺 https://amzn.to/4uBiB6Q
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rayomisterioso8

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,46811,62811,5487 August 2026 — 11,473 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,468 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,475 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,483 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,479 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,474 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,477 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,479 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,483 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,484 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,481 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,487 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,492 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,493 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,490 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,492 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,493 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,494 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,496 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,502 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,506 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,508 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,502 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,508 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,500 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,497 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,503 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,509 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,526 subscribers18 September 2026 — 11,531 subscribers1 October 2026 — 11,515 subscribers6 October 2026 — 11,502 subscribers10 October 2026 — 11,505 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,492 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,493 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,492 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,490 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,492 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,493 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,492 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,484 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,480 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,479 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,513 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,589 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,592 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,593 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,596 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,603 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,617 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,623 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,628 subscribers7 August 20263 November 2026
52 measurements spanning 87 days, net +155. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,444–11,652 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 01:4611,628+5
2 Nov 2026, 03:5711,623+6
1 Nov 2026, 03:0011,617+14
30 Oct 2026, 04:0011,603+7
29 Oct 2026, 07:1511,596+3
28 Oct 2026, 08:3111,593+1
26 Oct 2026, 07:2611,592+3
25 Oct 2026, 08:1611,589+76
24 Oct 2026, 11:0411,513+34
23 Oct 2026, 11:5511,479-1
22 Oct 2026, 10:4011,480-4
21 Oct 2026, 05:5111,484-8
20 Oct 2026, 01:3211,492-1
18 Oct 2026, 23:1111,493+1
18 Oct 2026, 00:4611,492+2
17 Oct 2026, 02:2711,490-2
16 Oct 2026, 03:3711,492-1
15 Oct 2026, 01:4911,493+1
13 Oct 2026, 21:5611,492-13
10 Oct 2026, 14:2111,505first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 11,628 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held45 (25 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total62,027
Reactions total657
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
146
Videos
716
Links
46

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
43m 51s
Average length
1m 50s

Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,355 reactions across 40 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍52038.4%
🔥17913.2%
🤔15611.5%
❤1299.52%
🤬765.61%
🤓624.58%
😱483.54%
👏372.73%
😢292.14%
💯191.40%
🤮171.25%
👀161.18%
😈151.11%
🤯141.03%
🖕70.517%
🤡70.517%
😁50.369%
😨50.369%
👎40.295%
🆒30.221%
6 further kinds70.517%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,355 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (8.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 12:43 UTC537 viewsread 5 November 2026

Problemas de electricidad en hoy en Laos tengo 1% de batería no creo que pueda subir nada

4 Nov 2026, 11:59 UTC≈1,000 views35 reactionsread 5 November 2026

El colapso del sistema financiero y la Tercera Guerra Mundial provocarán la mayor crisis de la historia de la humanidad. Ni siquiera hace falta la guerra, la propia deuda insostenible nos empujará hacia el precipicio. El terror en las calles, muertes, escasez absoluta. Para cuando llegue ese momento ya será demasiado tarde, y estamos mucho más cerca de lo que crees. Has obedecido demasiado a tu presidente y estas son…

👍14❤7🤔6🔥3🤓3👎2

3 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTC≈1,290 views32 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Tu gobierno occidental tiene el control sobre ti y sobre tus bienes, aunque pienses que son tuyos. No les importas nada, te ven como un objeto desechable al que sacarle el dinero mientras estás vivo y saben que eres fácil de reemplazar cuando estás muerto. Seguirán metiendo de forma obligada a más ciudadanos en su sistema corrupto para seguir chupando su dinero. Solo hay que ver lo que ha pasado en España, y te sal…

👍18🔥4❤3💯3👏2✍1🤓1

2 Nov 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,450 views42 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

¿Por qué no dejamos de llevar bebés sanos al médico cada tres meses, que les inyecten veneno en los brazos, después volver a casa con un bebé enfermo y luego llamarlo una "visita de bienestar"?

👍20🤯8🤔4❤3💯2😱2🔥1🤓1

31 Oct 2026, 14:40 UTC≈2,380 views59 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Halloween es un gran ritual satánico en el que participas sin darte cuenta. Este hombre fue miembro de una secta y explica que sacrifican niños y después se beben su sangre para celebrar el año nuevo, que para ellos es el 31 de octubre. Recuerda estas palabras hoy por la noche.

🤬27🔥16🤔4😁4❤3💯3👌1🤓1

31 Oct 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,930 views22 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Halloween 🎃👹

🤮11👍6❤2🔥2🤓1

30 Oct 2026, 15:08 UTC≈2,210 views44 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Los Illuminati utilizan diversas técnicas como la programación de control mental, los rituales de magia negra y los planes de despoblación, pero la sociedad está demasiado ocupada con las distracciones como para abrir los ojos y darse cuenta de lo que les están haciendo.

👍27👀6🔥6🤔4🤓1

29 Oct 2026, 15:46 UTC≈2,750 views35 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Richie the Barber habla sobre la brujería demoníaca que se utiliza en la Iglesia de Beyoncé. Si eres fan de Beyoncé siento herir tus sentimientos, pero es algo que tenías que saber tarde o temprano.

👍17🔥5🤯5❤3🤮3🤓2

27 Oct 2026, 14:28 UTC≈2,820 views46 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

Este hombre, Ronald Bernard, estuvo metido en el mundo de las finanzas internacionales, pero vio cosas tan perturbadoras que tuvo que salir de allí y mostrar al mundo lo que está ocurriendo realmente detrás del telón. Lo que a simple vista parecen edificios bancarios inofensivos, en realidad son redes oscuras controladas por figuras poderosas del ámbito financiero y político. Estos grupos realizan rituales, chantaj…

👍23🔥7🤔5💯4❤3🤬3🤓1

27 Oct 2026, 09:07 UTC≈2,420 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Tengo que hacer unas cosas ahora luego hago algún video 👁️

❤4🆒3

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @Rayomisterioso8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Oct 2026, 00:06 UTCAnonymous Poll123 voters

qué haces

  1. Lo he vendido todo7%
  2. Sigo dentro15%
  3. Voy a comprar fuerte se va a la luna11%
  4. Ni he comprado ni compraré67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Oct 2026, 07:52 UTCAnonymous Poll485 voters

¿Crees que los extraterrestres ya están entre nosotros? 👁️🛸🛸

  1. Sí, llevan siglos aquí y tienen apariencia extraterrestre34%
  2. Sí, están entre nosotros pero no tienen apariencia extraterreste58%
  3. No están aquí4%
  4. No están aquí ni en otro lugar, estamos solos en el universo4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Oct 2026, 02:02 UTCAnonymous Poll493 voters

La cámara de tu teléfono te está observando ahora mismo mientras lees esto 👁️

  1. Sí nos están espiando95%
  2. No nos espían nadie nos está observando5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rayo Misterioso 👁️” (@Rayomisterioso8), 11,628 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rayomisterioso8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.