Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DBR

Channel

DBR

@RealDBR

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

490subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002124009991
TypeChannel
Username@RealDBR
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RealDBR

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

489494491.57 August 2026 — 489 subscribers7 August 2026 — 489 subscribers15 August 2026 — 494 subscribers29 August 2026 — 493 subscribers13 September 2026 — 490 subscribers4907 August 202613 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 38 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 488–495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 21:39490-3
29 Aug 2026, 00:54493-1
15 Aug 2026, 12:36494+5
7 Aug 2026, 03:15489no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:09489first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

294 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬7224.5%
👍3913.3%
👏3712.6%
💯3010.2%
🤣279.18%
🤮279.18%
🤡144.76%
🔥93.06%
😡72.38%
💩62.04%
41.36%
😁41.36%
😈41.36%
🎉20.68%
🤝20.68%
🥴20.68%
10.34%
❤‍🔥10.34%
💊10.34%
🤪10.34%
4 further kinds41.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC26 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/RealDaBR/s/193 ¡Feliz cumpleanos Bogotá!

👍2👏2🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC99 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

DELITO. Hubo fraude electoral, y ya está, es la verdad. Esto quizá no cambie nada en cuanto a la práctica, el presidente será de la Espriella, las cosas seguirán su curso, sin embargo, sabemos, con pruebas, análisis, y antecedentes, que: el fraude electoral existió, y favoreció al presidente electo. Y no crean que solo por ser esto, es algo que pasa poco, por ejemplo, te atracan un día, te quitan el celular y tu d

👍9💯5👏3❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC145 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Eso explicaría muchas cosas.

🤣11😁2🦄1😈1

2 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC155 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Pues esperen buena salud. 🤣🤣🤣 Mas dinero para las EPS, y menos para los pacientes.

🤬13🤮5

1 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC169 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

¡Ahhh no, qué hijueputas pruebas! 10 años de prisión a Petro con eso. 🤣🤣🤣 Oiga, pero, es que tienen un afán de hacer el ridículo, una cosa impresionante, unos escándalos más pendejos, claro que, eso lo hacen para tapar las cagadas que va haciendo el gobierno electo, tampoco es en vano.

🤮7🤡6👍3💩3🤬2💯1🤣1

1 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC147 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Áreas de Protección para la Producción de Alimentos. https://upra.gov.co/sites/default/files/2025-09/20230925_Cartilla_APPA.pdf ¿Qué son, por qué son importantes? ¿Y por qué setenta hijueputas el gobierno entrante quiere erradicar las?.

👏5🔥2🤯1

31 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC159 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

La novia del hijo de alias 'Jorge 40' viene a hablar de honestidad y anti corrupción, mira la hipocresía. Pero, bueno si realmente hay culpables que caigan, pero, si ella está engañando, debe pagar con cárcel, y mucho tiempo, que se sienta realmente el peso de la ley sobre ella.

👏8💯5🎉2

30 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC175 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bueno, ya se sabe que volvemos a ser la perra de Estados Unidos.

👍10🤮3😈21💯1

29 Jul 2026, 23:16 UTC195 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

TELEGRAM La aplicación de mensajería instantánea con funciones de redes sociales más completas del mercado, creada por Pavel Durov (Павел Дуров) y financiada por su hermano Nikolai Durov (Николай Дуров), funciona como fundación, entonces, las ganancias de las otras empresas se donan a Telegram y VK (ВКонтакте); que es la plataforma inicial de los hermanos, conocida colonel Facebook ruso (mucho más completo, por exp

💯7👏32🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 00:04 UTC183 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

¡Trabajen vagos! Pero, si es mi buen amigo alias "FICO" en evidente estado de embriaguez, y probablemente bajo los efectos de otras sustancias. Son los mismos que hablaban de Gustavo petro, refiriéndose a él, como un borracho y drogadicto. 🤔 🤔

🤬10🤡2🔥1😈1

26 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC223 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

El prontuario de los funcionarios nombrados por el presidente electo, son una cosa única, todos absolutamente todos, son criminales, incluyendo al electo presidente de la Espriella (presuntamente 😁). ¿En serio hubo gente que votó por esa mierda?

🤬6🤮21💊1💯1

24 Jul 2026, 22:53 UTC239 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Era más que obvio. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦‍♀🤦‍♀🤦‍♀🤦‍♀🤦‍♀

💯4🤬3🔥2🤮2💩1🤪1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RealDBR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gustavo Petro
@gustavopetrooficial · 22,620
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 September 2026
ATENCIÓN PEREIRA.
@atencionpereirasincensura · 35,401
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DBR” (@RealDBR), 490 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealDBR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.