Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Reject Agenda

Channel

Reject Agenda

@Reject_Agenda

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,878subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001962212724
TypeChannel
Username@Reject_Agenda
Created5 April 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Reject_Agenda

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,8772,8982,887.56 August 2026 — 2,884 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,884 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,880 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,887 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,888 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,887 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,892 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,897 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,898 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,890 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,887 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,878 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,877 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,878 subscribers2,8786 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,874–2,901 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:592,878+1
13 Sept 2026, 17:192,877-1
10 Sept 2026, 01:542,878-9
4 Sept 2026, 23:172,887-3
1 Sept 2026, 05:252,890-8
28 Aug 2026, 19:012,898+1
25 Aug 2026, 16:032,897+5
22 Aug 2026, 14:172,892+5
18 Aug 2026, 20:552,887-1
16 Aug 2026, 02:372,888+1
12 Aug 2026, 15:572,887+7
9 Aug 2026, 12:042,880-4
6 Aug 2026, 11:042,884no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:302,884first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23m 11s
Average length
1m 27s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬4034.8%
🔥2622.6%
👍1513.0%
😱108.70%
97.83%
😈76.09%
💯21.74%
😡21.74%
🤔10.87%
🤯10.87%
🤷‍♀10.87%
🥰10.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 03:42 UTC70 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Apart from showing up to meetings, raising our voices, doing all activism.... Time to go plant endangered plant species all over. Credit: colenotcole T.me/Reject_Agenda T.me/Reject_Agenda_Chat

👍2

3 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC125 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheEyesThatSeePhoto

He won’t be satisfied until he destroys everything! T.me/Eys2C

🤬7🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 22:22 UTC102 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @agentsoftruthVideo

According to Trump, everyone wants to live next to a data center. Here are some people living next to one. Credit: enviams T.me/AgentsOfTruth T.me/AgentsOfTruthChatGroup

😱3🤬2🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC137 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheEyesThatSeeVideo

NOONE HAS A RIGHT TO DESTROY NATURE! Despicable! Romania BLOWS UP river to keep Nuclear Plant running Facing severe drought, Romanian military detonated 180 kg (396 lbs) of explosives to force more water from the Danube River towards the Cernavoda Station for safe cooling One reactor has already been shut down. T.me/Eys2C

🤬2😱2

3 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC118 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @agentsoftruthVideo

Without nature, we won't exist Credit: jonnynature1 T.me/AgentsOfTruth T.me/AgentsOfTruthChatGroup

👍62

1 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC115 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @agentsoftruthVideo

THE GOVERNMENT IS PAYING FARMERS TO DESTROY FRUIT TREES!!! Credit: houston.namati T.me/AgentsOfTruth T.me/AgentsOfTruthChatGroup

😱2🤬1😡1

1 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC173 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Credit: coachtd87 T.me/Reject_Agenda T.me/Reject_Agenda_Chat

🔥3🤬1

31 Jul 2026, 03:53 UTC163 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheEyesThatSeeVideo

These data centers are averaging 85 dBA (decibels) constantly. The EPA says humans can tolerate from 50-60 dBA. 85 dBA for over 8 hours a day causes hearing loss and damage to the central nervous system to humans and animals. Credit: CNBC T.me/Eys2C

🤬7😱3🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 00:09 UTC122 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thetrutheristPhoto

Resistance and boycott!!! All are poison ☠️ T.me/TheTrutherist T.me/TheTrutheristChat

🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 23:56 UTC128 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thetrutheristVideo

The purpose of the media is to DECEIVE and BRAINWASH and many of us have survived the biggest psychological operation to submit to a mass destruction. Sadly too many didn't make it. They will try it again if we forget. Therefore NEVER FORGET, NEVER STOP TALKING ABOUT IT! NEVER STOP SHARING! T.me/TheTrutherist T.me/TheTrutheristChat

🔥2💯1

30 Jul 2026, 18:12 UTC160 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheEyesThatSeeVideo

Of course all of these fires are started by individuals. NOT climate change. 275 people DETAINED over raging wildfires in France — Interior Minister Nunez 70% of them DELIBERATELY started Over 14,000 fires recorded since start of summer – with at least 117,000 hectares burned. Credit: R T T.me/Eys2C

🤬5😡1

29 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC147 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @agentsoftruthVideo

New cars infrared laser monitor Open prison system. They're testing a mass control system on us. Don't buy new cars. As they come with a laser eye monitoring system and a kill switch. Harmful for the eyes and brain, one's life and one's privacy. Credit: t_k_tropicano T.me/AgentsOfTruth T.me/AgentsOfTruthChatGroup

🔥7👍1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Reject_Agenda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Conspiracy Theory
@conspiracy_theory3 · 47,735
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Reject Agenda” (@Reject_Agenda), 2,878 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Reject_Agenda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.