Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ریمیکس مهدیار

Channel

ریمیکس مهدیار

@Remix_Mahdyar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

46,177subscribers

+2,650 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001999548374
TypeChannel
Username@Remix_Mahdyar
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held50
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Remix_Mahdyar

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

43,52746,17744,85215 August 2026 — 43,527 subscribers16 August 2026 — 43,558 subscribers17 August 2026 — 43,565 subscribers18 August 2026 — 43,570 subscribers19 August 2026 — 43,621 subscribers20 August 2026 — 43,648 subscribers22 August 2026 — 43,672 subscribers24 August 2026 — 43,694 subscribers25 August 2026 — 43,697 subscribers26 August 2026 — 43,739 subscribers27 August 2026 — 43,768 subscribers28 August 2026 — 43,801 subscribers28 August 2026 — 43,783 subscribers29 August 2026 — 43,791 subscribers30 August 2026 — 43,790 subscribers1 September 2026 — 43,794 subscribers2 September 2026 — 43,796 subscribers3 September 2026 — 43,811 subscribers5 September 2026 — 43,819 subscribers8 September 2026 — 43,968 subscribers11 September 2026 — 44,086 subscribers13 September 2026 — 44,192 subscribers14 September 2026 — 44,248 subscribers16 September 2026 — 44,326 subscribers18 September 2026 — 44,469 subscribers24 September 2026 — 44,719 subscribers3 October 2026 — 45,055 subscribers8 October 2026 — 45,210 subscribers12 October 2026 — 45,407 subscribers14 October 2026 — 45,491 subscribers15 October 2026 — 45,559 subscribers16 October 2026 — 45,603 subscribers17 October 2026 — 45,659 subscribers18 October 2026 — 45,704 subscribers19 October 2026 — 45,755 subscribers20 October 2026 — 45,815 subscribers21 October 2026 — 45,874 subscribers22 October 2026 — 45,906 subscribers23 October 2026 — 45,942 subscribers25 October 2026 — 45,961 subscribers26 October 2026 — 45,960 subscribers26 October 2026 — 45,975 subscribers27 October 2026 — 45,993 subscribers29 October 2026 — 46,030 subscribers30 October 2026 — 46,053 subscribers31 October 2026 — 46,084 subscribers1 November 2026 — 46,099 subscribers2 November 2026 — 46,116 subscribers3 November 2026 — 46,136 subscribers4 November 2026 — 46,177 subscribers15 August 20264 November 2026
50 measurements spanning 81 days, net +2,650. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,130–46,575 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 09:0746,177+41
3 Nov 2026, 05:5046,136+20
2 Nov 2026, 09:1446,116+17
1 Nov 2026, 09:2646,099+15
31 Oct 2026, 08:1746,084+31
30 Oct 2026, 05:1946,053+23
29 Oct 2026, 04:4046,030+37
27 Oct 2026, 23:3845,993+18
26 Oct 2026, 22:3645,975+15
26 Oct 2026, 01:1145,960-1
25 Oct 2026, 00:0945,961+19
23 Oct 2026, 21:2945,942+36
22 Oct 2026, 21:5645,906+32
21 Oct 2026, 20:5745,874+59
20 Oct 2026, 13:2045,815+60
19 Oct 2026, 12:4945,755+51
18 Oct 2026, 11:0045,704+45
17 Oct 2026, 10:2845,659+56
16 Oct 2026, 10:2745,603+44
15 Oct 2026, 08:1545,559first reading

Engagement

209 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 159 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 46,177 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,060
118 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.625%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
119
of 209 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 73 of 118 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held209 (6 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total596,989
Reactions total3,247
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 04:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 37s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,516 reactions across 146 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔2,95439.3%
❤‍🔥1,77223.6%
🔥1,18515.8%
🕊87911.7%
💊7269.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 147 of the 209 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,516 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 209 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 208 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Remix_Mahdyar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 209 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 119 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

1 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC≈4,360 views22 reactionsread 4 November 2026

یِ روزی یادم میوفتیو میگی ؛ این با بَقیه فرق داشت ..

💔15🕊4🔥3

31 Oct 2026, 16:59 UTC≈1,210 views7 reactionsread 1 November 2026

منتظر لایکتونم🙄

💊4💔2🕊1

31 Oct 2026, 15:14 UTC≈5,400 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026

پست جدید اینستام حمایت کنید ❤️‍🔥

❤‍🔥3💔1🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 15:13 UTC≈5,340 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026

https://www.instagram.com/p/DfKcwOJIX1b/?mdxt=am14eXBzMmJyZGo=

💔5

31 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,760 views1 reactionsread 1 November 2026

همگی جویین بشید حرفی درخواستی ریمیکسی خواستید اینجا بگید

💔1

30 Oct 2026, 06:51 UTC≈3,140 views5 reactionsread 1 November 2026

حرفی سخنی درخواستی بود بگید ~ @JayeKhalyi

💊3💔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 209 posts we hold for @Remix_Mahdyar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 10 posts on @Remix_Mahdyar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

" Papyon 🎀
@Ist_Ghalbii · 137
#1
♧سلاطین♧
@telgramdeprstmood · 154
#2
$
@faaiery · 69
#3
.
@nephtice · 276
#4
Harpy
@ex3pert · 163
#5
alone girl
@flotung · 88 (as read 28 August 2026)
#6
Mina's daily 🍓
@MewwLt · 520 (as read 28 August 2026)
#7
ŦιƦm
@Herueeine · 64
#8
᧔༚᧓ 
@khial_pardazi · 874 (as read 28 August 2026)
#9
- A
@Stroungirl · 236 (as read 28 August 2026)
#10
M
@hiatur · 2,677
#11
F'hhh
@Jarobahc · 176 (as read 28 August 2026)
#12
P L
@rawoi · 341 (as read 28 August 2026)
#13
Conceited
@Vainally · 1,536
#14
Wınsȶon‌‌‌
@V1NSTUN · 284
#15
Angel🪽
@Bluudthirsty · 319
#16
Lavera 𓏲𐝃
@Lavera1 · 3,614
#17
Farewell
@IDFarewell · 181 (as read 28 August 2026)
#18
ابر بی اعصاب بغلی🧚‍♀
@moodiiiiiiiiiiiii98 · 591
#19
Camara
@camara_ch · 60
#20
Pd
@malakeh_blue · 112
#21
Vuelo
@lunpearl · 802 (as read 28 August 2026)
#22
bahar
@youmeili · 35 (as read 28 August 2026)
#23
‌ ‌FRISKY
@TheFrisky · 2,180
#24
6:13
@Tripy613 · 1,733
#25
ONE
@lDccv · 56
#26
ꫧǝ
@Persistenche · 44
#27
ΛƧƬΣЯIΛ
@Jooliet · 47 (as read 28 August 2026)
#28
C ya
@lotvore · 509 (as read 28 August 2026)
#29
Galaxy
@longlovely1 · 91 (as read 28 August 2026)
#30
Sickliy
@Sickliy · 26,512
#31
Ðiba
@POUERCH · 42
#32
chance again
@sudcx · 245 (as read 28 August 2026)
#33
memurial
@memuriall · 701
#34
𐌼ɾ 𑜅
@Moutafaker · 2,066
#35
okra
@okrra · 96,934
#36
étoile
@msicaI · 198 (as read 28 August 2026)
#37
L
@Lroic · 3,017
#38

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🎵آهنگ ریمیکس کردی غمگین رپ 💊
@musicmosaken · 120,147
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
_mx.Music
@navid_Remix · 19,625
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 27 September 2026
سایت شرطبندی /ترفند سودهی/ربات تشخیص ضریب انفجار
@nasabet_org1 · 24,367
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 September 2026
Music hosein🎵
@hoseinmusicc · 71,805
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 21 August 2026
موزیک | ریمیکس | کلیپ خاص 🎶
@Clip_TaK0 · 33,480
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 2 September 2026
اخبار دلی بازارها
@miixdeli · 63,736
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
🔘𝗥𝗘𝗠𝗜𝗫 𝗥𝗔𝗣𝗜
@urap_ufarsi · 55,667
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
Mahdyar.kp
@Mahdyarofficial · 84,523
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘅 𝗟𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴🥇
@Remix_loving · 26,088
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 September 2026
Mahyar | مهیار
@FullArchive_Mahyar · 44,679
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ریمیکس مهدیار” (@Remix_Mahdyar), 46,177 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Remix_Mahdyar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.