Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Remnant Intel Network

Channel

Remnant Intel Network

@RemnantIntel

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

186subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001119248764
TypeChannel
Username@RemnantIntel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RemnantIntel

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@SeaOfRighteousness/69025 Jun 2026, 12:06 UTC@RemnantIntel/1647 · this entry25 Jun 2026, 12:06 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@SeaOfRighteousness6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @SeaOfRighteousness. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1861881877 August 2026 — 188 subscribers7 August 2026 — 188 subscribers15 August 2026 — 187 subscribers29 August 2026 — 186 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 186–188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 01:05186-1
15 Aug 2026, 00:58187-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:16188no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:34188first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 2 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026

Wld UMNO's resurgence and PSA's meteoric rise in Malaysia shift geopolitical landscape drastically by Msia's 2028 general elections? https://www.channelnewsasia.com/commentary/malaysia-anwar-ibrahim-election-ph-defeat-negeri-sembilan-6294406

28 Jul 2026, 00:30 UTC88 viewsread 7 August 2026

Heartbreaking. The rise of smartphones have been linked to the doubling of depressed youths and suicide rates amongst teens. Don't use digital gadgets to nanny your kids (makes them addicts to screens) and delay giving a smartphone to them until you have taught them the risks from cyberspace. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Bp4rWRhEW/

26 Jul 2026, 05:33 UTC72 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @RealTimeDailyNewsPhoto

BREAKING: Taxpayer-funded transgender dolls with removable genitalia are set to be placed in Minnesota classrooms for children as young as four years old to teach them about "different options." ➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews

20 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC287 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

Korean Population Study Researchers: "Our data showed associations between COVID-19 vaccination and an increased the risk of six cancer types, namely, thyroid (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–1.51), gastric (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13–1.58), colorectal (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12–1.47), lung (HR, 1.533; 95% CI, 1.25–1.87), breast (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07–1.34), and prostate (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.35

15 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC88 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vow_222

Dear all, We will be conducting "Kingdom Basics: Beyond Religion" Bible Study on the 25-July, from 930am to 430pm. Registration link is here: https://forms.gle/63Nbt1b39tpPN1fU7 The purpose of this discussion is to equip believers to understand that they need to go beyond religious living to truly function as Christ's disciples. Christ did not call us into a religion or to be faithful to a religion called Christian

9 Jul 2026, 04:01 UTC97 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The number 1 goal of nwo is power in the hands of some elites through control of the masses. Surveillance = control. New laws are introduced to police what you post not just in Europe, but in Korea and Australia (and soon, perhaps everywhere else with established ties..).

8 Jul 2026, 03:12 UTC96 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Increasingly important to distinguish between groundless conspiracies and evidence-based discoveries. Foundation of groundless conspiracies are untruths. Nothing is proven at all but a sinful desire remains to intellectually 2nd guess a plot behind things smart-aleck style. Foundation of evidence-based discoveries is truth. A non-mainstream fact has been uncovered but the challenge is to make sense of it objectivel

3 Jul 2026, 06:00 UTC378 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The US recently held a special hearing on MK Ultra that reveals evidence that mind control has been studied since the 1950s. MK Ultra is a covert CIA project that was exposed in 1977. It aimed to learn how to program the minds of individuals and masses. Never before revealed insights are shared in this hearing. Watch to be better informed about the "mystery of lawlessness" (2 Thessalonians 2:7) functioning undergro

1

1 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC87 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"The media exposes a scandal – a network of rich, powerful men are abusing teenage girls. Outrage spreads fast... Yet the system shields many of those involved, and few face serious consequences. This isn’t about Jeffrey Epstein – it’s a scandal that unfolded in Victorian London... The series was swiftly syndicated around the world as “the London scandal” and people speculated on the identities of the men described.

1

29 Jun 2026, 03:57 UTC81 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @RealTimeDailyNewsPhoto

Voting has consequences. Canada voted for socialism, higher taxes, more regulations, less freedom. Business investors decided to go elsewhere. This is why Canada would be ranked near the bottom compared to every state in the USA. ➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @RemnantIntel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Remnant Intel Network” (@RemnantIntel), 186 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RemnantIntel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.