
Channel
Hamdi’s pulmonary channel
@RespiratoryChest
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,032subscribers
+118 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002118909176 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RespiratoryChest |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RespiratoryChest |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:06 | 3,032 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 3,035 | +3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 3,032 | -2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 3,034 | -2 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 3,036 | +1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 05:41 | 3,035 | +4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 3,031 | +100 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:25 | 2,931 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 2,931 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:27 | 2,930 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 2,929 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 2,927 | +16 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 2,911 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 2,912 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 2,914 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@medallbooks · 45,778
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
@alhayatedu · 22,193
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 24 September 2026
@yassericu · 42,006
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
@Uworld_USMLE_2023 · 22,275
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
@AlAzharAssiutMedicalSchool · 26,690
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
@ahmedyasminc1 · 26,457
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 September 2026
@physiolibrary · 41,460
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
@Updates_in_Medicine · 49,330
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
@atlasofdermathology · 23,496
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 September 2026
@criticalcaremedicin · 22,054
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 September 2026
@medicinaintensivaalamano · 23,058
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
@FamilyPhysician_1 · 28,457
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
@Boards_Beyond_videos · 42,841
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
@Clinical_Notes · 40,119
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
@respiratoryupdates · 20,332
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
@CriticalCareUpdates · 20,161
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
@ClinicalPharmGuideline · 62,336
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
@The_NEJM · 27,734
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
@IslamKhalaf · 85,583
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@medicine99 · 26,722
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
@Medicine_Way2 · 133,718
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
@doctorhypo · 95,976
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@Medical_Patna · 47,287
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hamdi’s pulmonary channel” (@RespiratoryChest), 3,032 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RespiratoryChest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.