Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نوبان | ریستارت 1406

Channel

نوبان | ریستارت 1406

@Restart_Nobann

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

44,547subscribers

-4,821 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002407759686
TypeChannel
Username@Restart_Nobann
Descriptionتبلیغات @ads_capitan
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Restart_Nobann

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

31.3 average views per post against 44,547 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.07%. Across the 3,506 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,638–99,987 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.18% and 11.2%, with a median of 5.33%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (8 August 2026 7 September 2026)
Posts measured597 of 597 published in the window (597 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled18,704
Mature posts only0.169% over 131 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers44,547 measured 7 September 2026
Cohortb31623:fas · 3,506 channels · p10 0.797% · p25 2.18% · p50 5.33% · p75 11.2% · p90 20.8%
Position in cohort0.571th percentile · 1/77 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.065% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 7 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

44,54749,36846,957.57 August 2026 — 49,368 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,368 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,353 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,298 subscribers9 August 2026 — 49,306 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49,241 subscribers11 August 2026 — 49,150 subscribers12 August 2026 — 49,033 subscribers14 August 2026 — 48,909 subscribers15 August 2026 — 48,821 subscribers16 August 2026 — 48,729 subscribers17 August 2026 — 48,664 subscribers18 August 2026 — 48,566 subscribers19 August 2026 — 48,352 subscribers21 August 2026 — 47,236 subscribers22 August 2026 — 46,142 subscribers23 August 2026 — 45,654 subscribers25 August 2026 — 45,451 subscribers26 August 2026 — 45,317 subscribers26 August 2026 — 45,209 subscribers27 August 2026 — 45,134 subscribers28 August 2026 — 45,044 subscribers29 August 2026 — 44,943 subscribers30 August 2026 — 44,900 subscribers31 August 2026 — 44,828 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,765 subscribers2 September 2026 — 44,721 subscribers4 September 2026 — 44,637 subscribers7 September 2026 — 44,547 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 31 days, net -4,821. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,824–50,091 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 03:5844,547-90
4 Sept 2026, 09:2044,637-84
2 Sept 2026, 21:4544,721-44
1 Sept 2026, 18:3544,765-63
31 Aug 2026, 20:0444,828-72
30 Aug 2026, 18:3544,900-43
29 Aug 2026, 20:3444,943-101
28 Aug 2026, 17:5345,044-90
27 Aug 2026, 20:2445,134-75
26 Aug 2026, 22:5445,209-108
26 Aug 2026, 00:3345,317-134
25 Aug 2026, 03:2545,451-203
23 Aug 2026, 23:0345,654-488
22 Aug 2026, 10:0546,142-1,094
21 Aug 2026, 00:4847,236-1,116
19 Aug 2026, 21:4848,352-214
18 Aug 2026, 19:5648,566-98
17 Aug 2026, 20:2548,664-65
16 Aug 2026, 20:4648,729-92
15 Aug 2026, 13:0548,821first reading

Engagement

642 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.068%
avg views ÷ 44,547 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.2
614 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.398%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
614
of 642 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 614 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held642 (5 August 20267 September 2026)
Views total18,528
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,440
Videos
1
Links
9,720

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 642 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 642 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 15:23 UTC3 viewsread 7 September 2026
Forwarded from @Tarh_Darrs

#تکالیف_شیمی‌جامع_فراهانی_1406 😼 تکالیف+آزمون+جزوه😼 دیگه چی میخوای هااا؟؟؟؟ ❤️‍🔥تکالیف فراهانی❤️‍🔥 ▫️تکالیف جلسه 01 ▫️تکالیف جلسه 02 ▫️تکالیف جلسه 03 ▫️تکالیف جلسه 04 ▫️تکالیف جلسه 05 ▫️تکالیف جلسه 06 ▫️تکالیف جلسه 07 ▫️تکالیف جلسه 08 ▫️تکالیف جلسه 09 ❤️‍🔥حل ویدیویی تکالیف فراهانی❤️‍🔥 ▫️حل‌تکالیف‌سری‌اول‌استوکیومتری ▫️ حل‌تکالیف‌سری‌دوم‌استوکیومتری ▫️حل‌تکالیف‌سری‌سوم‌استوکیومتری ▫️حل‌تکالیف ‌سری‌چهارم‌استوکیو

7 Sept 2026, 14:49 UTC6 viewsread 7 September 2026
Forwarded from @shimii_FarahaniiiPhoto

#سالیانه_شیمی‌جامع_فراهانی_1406 😼 تکالیف+آزمون+جزوه😼 دیگه چی میخوای هااا؟؟؟؟ ❤️‍🔥جزوات خام❤️‍🔥 🔴 جزوه خام استوکیومتری بخش 1 🔵جزوه خام استوکیومتری یکجا 🔴جزوه پرشده جلسه یک تا پنج 🔵جزوه خام فصل1دهم بخش 1 🔴 جزوه خام فصل1دهم بخش 2 🔵 جزوه خام فصل1دهم یکجا ❤️‍🔥تکالیف❤️‍🔥 🔴تکالیف جلسه01+برنامه مطالعاتی 🔵تکالیف جلسه02+برنامه مطالعاتی 🔴تکالیف جلسه03+برنامه مطالعاتی 🔵تکالیف جلسه04+برنامه مطالعاتی 🔴تکالیف جلسه05+برنامه م

7 Sept 2026, 13:34 UTC8 viewsread 7 September 2026
Forwarded from @shimii_FarahaniiiPhoto

پک آرشیو شیمی کنکور 1405 استاد پارسا فراهانی ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔴دوره های سالیانه فراهانی ⚪️ دوره سالیانه شیمی جامع فراهانی 1405 ⚪️ دوره سالیانه شیمی پیشرفته جامع فراهانی 1405 🔴دوره های دهم و یازدهم فراهانی ⚪️ سالیانه شیمی دهم فراهانی 1405 ⚪️ سالیانه شیمی یازدهم فراهانی 1405 ⚪️ نهایی یازدهم شیمی فراهانی 1405 🔴دوره های نهایی فراهانی ⚪️ نهایی شیمی جامع فراهانی 1405 ⚪️ نهایی شیمی دوازدهم فراهانی 1405 ⚪️ حل سوالات نهایی ش

7 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTC9 viewsread 7 September 2026
Forwarded from @Fiziik_GHozatii

➕ جلسه 3 سالیانه فیزیک قضاتی 1406 اپلود شد.

7 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTC9 viewsread 7 September 2026
Forwarded from @Fiziik_GHozatiiPhoto

#سالیانه‌_فیزیک‌جامع_قضاتی_1406 ➕سالیانه قضاتی 💬 جلسات اصلی جلسه 00 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 01 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 02 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 03 ←[ دریافت ] 🟣طرح درس 👈🏼@Tarh_Darrs 🟣آرشیو اساتید 👈🏼@arshiiveee

7 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC13 viewsread 7 September 2026

➕ جلسه 4 سالیانه فلسفه و منطق جلالی 1406 اپلود شد.

7 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC8 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#سالیانه_فلسفه‌ومنطق‌جامع_جلالی_1406 ➕سالیانه جلالی 💬 جلسات اصلی جلسه 01 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 02 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 03 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 04 ←[ دریافت ] 💬 جلسات حل تست جلسه 01 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 02 ←[ دریافت ] 🟣طرح درس 👈🏼@Tarh_Darrs 🟣آرشیو اساتید 👈🏼@arshiiveee

7 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC3 viewsread 7 September 2026

➕ جلسه 5 سالیانه فلسفه و منطق فروغی نیا 1406 اپلود شد.

7 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC3 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#سالیانه_فلسفه‌ومنطق‌جامع_فروغی‌نیا_1406 ➕سالیانه فروغی نیا 💬 جلسات اصلی جلسه 01 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 02 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 03 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 04 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 05 ←[ دریافت ] 🟣طرح درس 👈🏼@Tarh_Darrs 🟣آرشیو اساتید 👈🏼@arshiiveee

7 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC3 viewsread 7 September 2026

➕ جلسه 8 سالیانه ریاضی غیاثی 1406 اپلود شد.

7 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC3 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

#سالیانه‌_ریاضی‌جامع_غیاثی_1406 ➕سالیانه غیاثی 💬 جلسات اصلی جلسه 01 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 02 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 03 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 04 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 05 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 06 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 07 ←[ دریافت ] جلسه 08 ←[ دریافت ] 🟣طرح درس 👈🏼@Tarh_Darrs 🟣آرشیو اساتید 👈🏼@arshiiveee

7 Sept 2026, 09:17 UTC37 viewsread 7 September 2026
Photo

غول ترین پک آرشیو زیست 1405 عشقا این پک رو برای کساییکه میخوان تدریس های پارسال رو بببین پشنهاد میکنم تمام دوره های اساتید رو کامل گذاشتم خسیس نباشید به دوستاتونم بدید🫤 🔴 فرهمندنیا 🔴 سالیانه جامع زیست فرهمندنیا 1405 شروع از مهر زیست فرهمندنیا 1405 دوره خط به خط زیست فرهمندنیا 1405 سالیانه زیست یازدهم فرهمندنیا 1405 امتحان نهایی زیست فرهمندنیا 1405 دوره CPR زیست فرهمندنیا 1405 بانک نهایی زیست یازدهم فرهمندنیا 1405

Showing the 12 most recent of 642 posts we hold for @Restart_Nobann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Restart_Nobann edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 August 2026
Most recent edit
7 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نوبان | ریستارت 1406” (@Restart_Nobann), 44,547 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Restart_Nobann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.