Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SAT (Results)

Channel

SAT (Results)

@ResultsSAT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

174subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003660314567
TypeChannel
Username@ResultsSAT
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 23 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ResultsSAT

Growth

174189181.57 August 2026 — 189 subscribers8 August 2026 — 188 subscribers8 August 2026 — 188 subscribers14 August 2026 — 185 subscribers22 August 2026 — 182 subscribers29 August 2026 — 178 subscribers7 September 2026 — 174 subscribers7 August 20267 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 31 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 172–191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 20:39174-4
29 Aug 2026, 16:19178-4
22 Aug 2026, 10:16182-3
14 Aug 2026, 21:14185-3
8 Aug 2026, 12:04188no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:44188-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:48189first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 23 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4443.6%
🔥3837.6%
👍1110.9%
🥰32.97%
❤‍🔥21.98%
😁21.98%
🤩10.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2026, 05:13 UTC267 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DanXQAqoWPV/?igsh=MWxwZnFxdGVjcDJ0ZQ==

30 May 2026, 14:39 UTC721 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SAT_Math_EnglishPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥1🔥1🤩1

30 May 2026, 14:39 UTC777 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @satmathacademyPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥3

30 May 2026, 14:39 UTC905 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SAT_Math_EnglishPhoto

English absolyut noldan 800 natija

🔥9

30 May 2026, 14:39 UTC907 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Kurslarni olishni tavsiya qilaman. Men martda boshlangan kursni sotib oldim matematikam 460 chiqardi. 2 oygaga ham bormay mocklarim 700+ bo'ldi. Ohirgi mockim 780 bo'lgandi real examda hayajon bo'lib 690 bo'lib qoldi. Bo'lmasa 800 ham olishga potensialim bor edi. 460 dan 800 ga o'sish bo'ldi juda kichik vaqt oralig'ida. Avval edu centerlarga borardim. 9 oy borganman. Hech nimani urgana olmagandim. Onlayn kurslarni tu

🔥75

30 May 2026, 14:39 UTC499 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SAT_Math_EnglishPhoto

Kursimizdagi o'quvchimizdan natija! 1300 grand ni naqd qilishdi

🔥1

30 May 2026, 14:39 UTC540 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SAT_Math_EnglishPhoto

50% lik ustamani 3 yilga naqd qilishdi

👍2

30 May 2026, 14:39 UTC569 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SAT_Math_EnglishPhoto

Kursimizdagi o'quvchimizdan natija! 1210 grand ni naqd qilishdi

👍2😁1

30 May 2026, 14:39 UTC604 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

натижам чикди🥹

🔥31❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ResultsSAT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SAT (Results)” (@ResultsSAT), 174 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ResultsSAT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.