Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Psyra | ذهن و شخصیــــت

Channel

Psyra | ذهن و شخصیــــت

@RetroPhilosopher

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,941subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002450359087
TypeChannel
Username@RetroPhilosopher
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RetroPhilosopher

Growth

1,9102,0321,9717 August 2026 — 1,966 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,966 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,954 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,950 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,943 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,932 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,910 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,032 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,004 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,979 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,966 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,941 subscribers1,9417 August 20266 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,892–2,050 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 08:011,941-25
2 Sept 2026, 11:461,966-13
30 Aug 2026, 11:481,979-25
27 Aug 2026, 20:062,004-28
25 Aug 2026, 05:162,032+122
22 Aug 2026, 08:381,910-22
18 Aug 2026, 21:471,932-11
15 Aug 2026, 12:291,943-7
12 Aug 2026, 04:131,950-4
8 Aug 2026, 17:311,954-12
7 Aug 2026, 17:321,966no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:121,966first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

344 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊34098.8%
👍41.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 344 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RetroPhilosopher. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC10 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بچه ها نمیدونم بهتون گفته بودم یه نه اما من مشاور تحصیلیم اینجا کنکوری ای داریم که نتونسته باشه امسال دوره های تابستانه مشاورها رو ثبت نام کنه؟

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC14 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

همچنان ووت بدین بچه ها ممکنه لازم شه روند چنل و یه تغییر کوچیک بدیم

🕊5

7 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC16 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @honZodiac

— فـکـت؛ اگه یه روز باهات خیلی سرد شدم، احتمالا قبلش هزار بار بهت فرصت داده بودم. Virgo . Taurus . Capricorn . Scorpio

🕊5

7 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC40 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

باشه فهمیدم تحلیل هام و دوست ندارین🤨

🕊13

6 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC69 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

پست هفته بعد تحلیل چی باشه؟

  1. آلبوم یا آهنگ یا MV17%
  2. کتاب29%
  3. فیلم34%
  4. کلا تحلیل نباشه و پست آموزشی باشه46%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🕊9

6 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC99 views21 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌🦢 چرا نینا بیشتر به OCPD نزدیکه تا OCD؟🦢 یکی از برداشت‌های رایج و اشتباه درباره‌ی نینا اینه که چون کمال‌گراست، روی بدن و اجرای خودش کنترل شدیدی داره و به سختی اشتباهاتش رو رها می‌کنه، پس احتمالاً OCD داره. اما این دوتا یکی نیستن. تفاوت اصلی توی چیه؟ در OCD، فرد معمولا با افکار یا تصاویر ناخواسته و آزاردهنده‌ و البته مداومی درگیره که اضطراب ایجاد می‌کنن و ممکنه برای کم کردنشون د

🕊21

5 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC134 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

چنلم و دیگه دوست ندارین یا چون نت ها ضعیف شدن ویو پایینه؟🥲

🕊23

5 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC169 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌🦢NINA | BLACK SWAN🦢 نینا فقط برای رسیدن به کمال نمی‌جنگید کم‌کم خودش رو هم توی این مسیر گم می‌کرد. 👚 بریم ببینیم پشت شکل گیری قوی سیاه چه چیزی در روان نینا در حال فروپاشی بود؟ ౨😐syra🦢🦢🦢

🕊31

4 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC349 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌🦢 BLACK SWAN | پارت دوم🦢 آیا اودت و اودیل نمادی از اید و سوپرایگو هستن؟ خوب حالا ییاین بریم سراغ اون سؤال مهمی که آخر پارت قبل گذاشتم: اودت و اودیل می‌تونن نماد اید و سوپرایگو باشن؟ برای جواب دادن اول باید یه سر بریم سراغ زیگموند فروید. فروید روان‌کاو اتریشی در سال 1923 توی کتاب The Ego and the Id مدل معروف ساختار روان رو مطرح کرد مدلی که روان انسان رو با سه بخش توضیح می‌ده: اید

🕊39

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RetroPhilosopher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

پست هفته بعد تحلیل چی باشه؟

  1. آلبوم یا آهنگ یا MV17%
  2. کتاب29%
  3. فیلم34%
  4. کلا تحلیل نباشه و پست آموزشی باشه46%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Psyra | ذهن و شخصیــــت” (@RetroPhilosopher), 1,941 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RetroPhilosopher.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.