@distekfin_bot
Channel
Reviews
@Reviewspmp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003100259585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Reviewspmp |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Reviewspmp |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
@distekfin_bot
@uahwdinwabot
@NicegramCryptoCardBot
https://t.me/irann_crypto https://t.me/chronotech https://t.me/crypto_india_group https://t.me/knightron_crypto https://t.me/crypto_tvot https://t.me/cryptoastronaut1 https://t.me/cryptofinderclub_ama https://t.me/crypto_poolz https://t.me/dubaicryptowhales0 https://t.me/crypto_whaleglobal https://t.me/crypto_nexus_community https://t.me/cryptopandaglobal https://t.me/dubaicryptoenglish https://t.me/crypto_planet_glo…
The accuracy of the vip signals provided allowed me to earn a significant amount of money in a short period of time.
I'm amazed at how much money I made just by following your signals - truly life-changing.
Guys from Black Quant is a reliable partner in my crypto investments. I have been working with this team since March 2024, since then I have increased my capital many times over. Oh yeah, I forgot, all this thanks to their VIP community🤭. It’s very nice to be there, there are a lot of very cool people who are ready to help and share their ideas. Well, an integral part of this community is their pump signals. Don't k…
If you don't have the courage to take risks and make a profit on your money, you can trust these guys because they know a lot about how to raise money in this difficult market, your money is safe, I promise.
You can call this project “Money Makers” because these business methods are game changing, and the review does not mention this, you can see from your own experience of making money from nothing. As for me, since I started following his instructions, I only make money and never lose it.
Following your methods of trading making me more confidence when we are talking about investment in crypto moves.
Your signals are easy to follow.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Reviewspmp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,254,507 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@chronotech · 78,1861 postCrypto India
@Crypto_india_Group · 64,5111 postCrypto Nexus Team
@Crypto_Nexus_Community · 9,8361 postCrypto Planet
@Crypto_Planet_Global · 9,5101 postCrypto Poolz
@Crypto_Poolz · 53,1201 postCrypto TVOT Community
@Crypto_TVOT · 61,8431 postWhales Pad - Chat
@crypto_whaleglobal · 22,5521 postCRYPTO ASTRONAUT
@CryptoAstronaut1 · 41,1651 postCrypto Avenue ™️
@CryptoAvenueGlobal · 9,7611 postCWN Crypto Chat
@CryptoChatCWN · 21,2881 postCRYPTO FINDER CLUB ️ ️
@CryptoFinderClub_Ama · 52,4931 postCrypto Leaks By GodLeak - Crypto future signal
@cryptoleaksz_group · 29,4581 postCrypto Miners
@CryptoMiners_Co · 16,7911 postCrypto Panda
@cryptopandaglobal · 31,2831 postCRYPTO RADIANT
@CryptoRadiant7 · 19,8461 postCrypto Wolf
@cryptowolfcommunity · 25,5721 postCrypto zone
@cryptozone2221 · 26,8041 postDubai Crypto English
@DubaiCryptoEnglish · 33,3781 postDubai Crypto Whales
@Dubaicryptowhales0 · 34,0711 postIran crypto
@irann_crypto · 87,7601 postKnightron Crypto
@knightron_crypto · 39,5131 postmarketfeed crypto
@marketfeed_crypto · 23,6411 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Reviewspmp named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reviews” (@Reviewspmp), 1 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Reviewspmp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.