Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rolling Stone

Channel

Rolling Stone

@RevistaRollingStone

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

132subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002742015007
TypeChannel
Username@RevistaRollingStone
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RevistaRollingStone

Growth

123132127.59 August 2026 — 123 subscribers9 August 2026 — 123 subscribers16 August 2026 — 125 subscribers24 August 2026 — 129 subscribers8 September 2026 — 132 subscribers9 August 20268 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 122–133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 09:00132+3
24 Aug 2026, 04:13129+4
16 Aug 2026, 18:29125+2
9 Aug 2026, 05:30123no change
9 Aug 2026, 05:17123first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 01:52 UTC44 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

🔴 — Posso falar agora?! Bom, se vocês perguntassem "Gente, vocês são todos atores, né?", a resposta seria sim. Antes de encerrar, os artistas citados devem pagar um cachê por terem aparecido no talk-show. Caro telespectador, e sim vou repetir isso toda vez. Essa é minha namorada britânica e americana, Violet Turner. I'm going stateside... Assitam Camila Loures para entender minhas referências!! Esse é o meu, o seu

31 Jul 2026, 01:35 UTC32 viewsread 9 August 2026

🚬 — O programa foi sim um circo, deu pra sorrir, Mas chegou a hora de se despedir. Obrigada pela companhia, mas é hora do tchau Ainda bem que foi apenas um programa especial.

31 Jul 2026, 01:28 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026

🔴 — Você lembrando da minha primeira paquera, ok. Só que ainda vamos pro Casos de Família depois que terminarmos esse circo de entrevista. O que você gostaria de compor como despedida, minha poetisa linda? Uia, ainda rimei para ti...

31 Jul 2026, 01:21 UTC35 viewsread 9 August 2026

🚬— Diria para ela continuar e nunca desistir. Também diria para ter um pouco mais de paciência. Nem tudo precisa acontecer de uma vez, e algumas das melhores coisas da vida chegam justamente quando a gente para de tentar apressar o tempo. Ah… e, se um dia um cantor coreano, quem sabe, a convidasse para tomar um chá durante um talk show… eu diria para ela aceitar sem pensar duas vezes.

31 Jul 2026, 01:16 UTC33 viewsread 9 August 2026

🔴 — Depois dessa fiquei até borocoxo. Como vingança, vai a pergunta mais difícil e única da sua vida. Incluindo os posts cringes que todo artista tem nessa era, o que você diria para Violet da sua era debut se ela estivesse nos assistindo?

31 Jul 2026, 01:12 UTC36 viewsread 9 August 2026

🔴 — Bom, com isso, eu vou ter que lançar minha It's Not Right But It's Okay.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RevistaRollingStone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rolling Stone” (@RevistaRollingStone), 132 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RevistaRollingStone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.