Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 490–621 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 19:59
606
+5
9 Sept 2026, 19:38
601
+23
1 Sept 2026, 10:46
578
+12
25 Aug 2026, 02:04
566
+32
17 Aug 2026, 11:24
534
+26
9 Aug 2026, 12:38
508
+3
9 Aug 2026, 06:46
505
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
44s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
493 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
213
43.2%
❤
170
34.5%
🔥
61
12.4%
👏
21
4.26%
🏆
9
1.83%
👌
6
1.22%
😍
4
0.811%
🍓
3
0.609%
👍
2
0.406%
😁
2
0.406%
👎
1
0.203%
💔
1
0.203%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 493 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یه چیزی که واقعا این چند روز توجه منو به خودش جلب کرده کلاینته جدیده!
طرف تو ۱۹ سالگی ایجنسی خودش رو راه انداخته، با پادکست Diary of a CEO همکاری کرده و پیجش رو به حدود ۱.۵ میلیون فالوور رسونده.
خیلی خوب سیستم ساخته همزمان چندتا پروژه رو مدیریت میکنه، تیم داره و همهچیز روی روال جلو میره.
از سرعتشم بگم اینطوریه که هر موقع من پیامش بدم یک دقیقه نشده جواب میده. ادیت بفرستم یک دقیقه بعد ریویو میده. و منی که عادت نداش…
یک قدم به هدفم نزدیک تر شدم :)
پریروز خیلی اتفاقی تو لینکدین یکی درخواست همکاری داد و وقتی پیش رفتیم ۲ تا ادیت تستی خواست در حد شورت های پادکست DOAC که تقریبا ساده بودن.
من خودم نشستم کل پادکستو دیدم و بهترین قسمت هاشو انتخاب کردم و خلاصه اسکریپت و دقیقه هاشو در اوردم و ادیتشو سپردم به یکی از بچه های تیم ایندم یکی از خفن ترینا و وقتی نتیجه رو فرستادیم طرف گفت:
this gets my excited seeing someone get exactly what we…
الگو کپی کنندم این بود:
بیاید از همین امشب شروع کنیم!
برای ریلز اولتون همچین ایده ای رو پیشنهاد میکنم. اینجوریه که سلام میکنید و میگید تازه اول راهید و دیگه معرفی خودتونو و هدفاتون.
اسکریپتی که استفاده کردم:
Hi, this is my first reel. I'm not famous. I have zero followers, and I'm a X year old X . After X for X , I realized it was time to become more than just X and start creating my own content. My goal is to bui…
ریلز اول منم اپلود شد!
واقعیتی که وجود داره من هیچوقت به ویدئو ادیتینگ علاقه نداشتم و صرفا بخاطر پول رفتم سمتش. اما در ادامه این مسیر فهمیدم عاشق کریتور شدن و ساختن پرسونال برندم، موضوع دیگه ای که بود اینه من قصد مهاجرت دارم و نیاز به درامد خیلی زیادی دارم و خلاصه مسیر جدیدی با هدفای جدیدی شروع کردم! قراره تا اخر تابستون ایجنسی خودمو بزنم با ۵ کا درامد در ماه. تو ویدئو هم گفتم... نمیدونم برسم به هدف هام یا نه ولی اون…
بچه ها اخر هفته تقریبا بعدظهر جمعه یه دورهمی خیلی کوچیک توی اصفهان داریم.
اگر دوست داشتید و میتونید بیایددد خوشحال میشمم❤️
بهم بگید تا هماهنگ کنم باهاتون:
@ReyhaneNowruzi
امروز یکی از بهترین ویدئو هامو گرفتم ازین سینماتیک ها که میگن، ازونا 😂 هوای افتابی با دشت گندوم های درو شده لعنتی خود وایب کابوی میدن🏜☀️
تا تابستونه و ازین دشتا هست برید استفادشو بکنید
۶۰ تا اسکریپت💀
۲۰۰ تا بی رول💀
چند روزم دوربین دستمه و فردا میرم طبیعت رکورد میکنم...
یه پرسونال برند خفن بزودی...
🔥49❤7🏆4👏3
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @ReyhaneJourney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“My Journey:)” (@ReyhaneJourney), 606 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ReyhaneJourney.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.