Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Reza Bahram|رضا بهرام

Channel

Reza Bahram|رضا بهرام

@Rezabahramir

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,158subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001449250925
TypeChannel
Username@Rezabahramir
DescriptionAdmin: @MrRamin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 October 2026
Last confirmed live5 October 2026
Measurements held16
On Telegramt.me/Rezabahramir

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1051,1581,131.56 August 2026 — 1,105 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,106 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,111 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,113 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,122 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,128 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,137 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,152 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,151 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,144 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,135 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,132 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,135 subscribers27 September 2026 — 1,143 subscribers5 October 2026 — 1,158 subscribers5 October 2026 — 1,158 subscribers6 August 20265 October 2026
16 measurements spanning 60 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,097–1,166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Oct 2026, 17:431,158no change
5 Oct 2026, 11:141,158+15
27 Sept 2026, 14:351,143+8
14 Sept 2026, 09:381,135+3
10 Sept 2026, 12:161,132-3
5 Sept 2026, 11:191,135-9
1 Sept 2026, 03:071,144-7
29 Aug 2026, 00:071,151-1
25 Aug 2026, 17:481,152+15
22 Aug 2026, 13:121,137+9
19 Aug 2026, 08:441,128+6
16 Aug 2026, 18:041,122+9
13 Aug 2026, 03:251,113+2
10 Aug 2026, 04:311,111+5
7 Aug 2026, 07:181,106+1
6 Aug 2026, 15:071,105first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HAMID HIRAAD
@HAMIDHIRAAD · 39,624
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 29 September 2026
RAGHEB
@Ragheboriginal · 36,120
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 1 September 2026
Dead
@Bioo_o · 33,671
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Reza Bahram|رضا بهرام” (@Rezabahramir), 1,158 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rezabahramir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.