Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ☾︎✿︎𖦹𝕽𝖔𝖐𝖎𝖘𝖆𖦹✿︎☽︎

Channel

☾︎✿︎𖦹𝕽𝖔𝖐𝖎𝖘𝖆𖦹✿︎☽︎

@Roki_1235

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002615872107
TypeChannel
Username@Roki_1235
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Roki_1235

Growth

202120.58 August 2026 — 20 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21 subscribers7 September 2026 — 20 subscribers8 August 20267 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 30 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 14:3920-1
16 Aug 2026, 19:2421+1
11 Aug 2026, 15:4520no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:1520first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1939.6%
custom 5350409329503662229816.7%
816.7%
custom 5379815841002964587510.4%
custom 536182368183414133636.25%
custom 519990308835744508324.17%
custom 535495633407051056224.17%
custom 521753749822532839812.08%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC8 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

「🧶」ーэтот арт грузился несколько дней❤️

❤‍🔥3

Signed ☁️𖧷☾︎𖦹ᥒ𐔤᥈ьⲧ 𐔖ⲧ яⲇᥱρⲕυ𖦹☽︎᯾☕

9 Aug 2026, 02:40 UTC8 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

「🧶」ーНедавно в Пинтерест увидел это фото и решил дорисовать,магмалаки мои отцы,хотя это мой первый арт по ним за 4 года как я их люблю🤩🤩

❤‍🔥3

Signed ☁️𖧷☾︎𖦹ᥒ𐔤᥈ьⲧ 𐔖ⲧ яⲇᥱρⲕυ𖦹☽︎᯾☕

2 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC17 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

「🧶」ーоткуда.тут.56 просмотров.

Signed ☁️𖧷☾︎𖦹ᥒ𐔤᥈ьⲧ 𐔖ⲧ яⲇᥱρⲕυ𖦹☽︎᯾☕

2 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC15 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

「🧶」

2custom 51999030883574450831custom 53504093295036622291custom 53549563340705105621

Signed ☁️𖧷☾︎𖦹ᥒ𐔤᥈ьⲧ 𐔖ⲧ яⲇᥱρⲕυ𖦹☽︎᯾☕

29 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC22 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

「🧶」ーпочему реакция гей флага,она де лесбиянка,вам дополнительно в реакции флаг лесби пихнуть?

custom 53618236818341413363

Signed ☁️𖧷☾︎𖦹ᥒ𐔤᥈ьⲧ 𐔖ⲧ яⲇᥱρⲕυ𖦹☽︎᯾☕

29 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC22 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

「🧶」ー💫

custom 53798158410029645875custom 53504093295036622292custom 51999030883574450831custom 53549563340705105621

Signed ☁️𖧷☾︎𖦹ᥒ𐔤᥈ьⲧ 𐔖ⲧ яⲇᥱρⲕυ𖦹☽︎᯾☕

28 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC24 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥32

Signed ☁️𖧷☾︎𖦹ᥒ𐔤᥈ьⲧ 𐔖ⲧ яⲇᥱρⲕυ𖦹☽︎᯾☕

28 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC21 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

「🧶」ーваще не люблю когда однополым парам приделывают ребенка,если только он не приемный или автор прописывает персов в мире омегаверса ну или тому подобное хз,ноо смотря на это чудо мне хочется нарисовать как я вижу детеныша мьюзиквижен,хотя никуда его больше не впихну😶😶 [Не осуждаю тех кто не ведет вселенную в омегаверс но при этом добавляет однополым парам родных детей,просто как по мне немножко это все же странно]

❤‍🔥43custom 52175374982253283981

Signed ☁️𖧷☾︎𖦹ᥒ𐔤᥈ьⲧ 𐔖ⲧ яⲇᥱρⲕυ𖦹☽︎᯾☕

28 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC20 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

「🧶」ーДетёныш спикера и тв,немношко уродец❗❗

❤‍🔥41

Signed ☁️𖧷☾︎𖦹ᥒ𐔤᥈ьⲧ 𐔖ⲧ яⲇᥱρⲕυ𖦹☽︎᯾☕

22 Jul 2026, 00:39 UTC40 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

「🧶」ーбебебе,тут конечно не ток мьюзиквижен но и почеркушки с тсм(я не знаю почему у него там ресницы, честное слово) ну да ладна,если не ошибаюсь то я начал рисовать спику выступы на ногах начиная с 4 фото(кстати мне подруня говорила что он на козлика похож,хехе)

custom 53504093295036622295

Signed ☁️𖧷☾︎𖦹ᥒ𐔤᥈ьⲧ 𐔖ⲧ яⲇᥱρⲕυ𖦹☽︎᯾☕

21 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

「🧶」ーя тут порылся в старых скечбуках и нашел пару артиков с мьюзиквижен наверное 2024 года +-,на утро обязательно вам скину их🤩 (Почему на недавнем арте 29 просмотров,кто эти 8 человек помимо моих подписчиков смотрят мой канал мне страшно)

❤‍🔥2

Signed ☁️𖧷☾︎𖦹ᥒ𐔤᥈ьⲧ 𐔖ⲧ яⲇᥱρⲕυ𖦹☽︎᯾☕

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Roki_1235. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“☾︎✿︎𖦹𝕽𝖔𝖐𝖎𝖘𝖆𖦹✿︎☽︎” (@Roki_1235), 20 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Roki_1235.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.