Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rose instructions🌹

Channel

Rose instructions🌹

@Rose_instructions

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,888subscribers

+8,700 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002011554305
TypeChannel
Username@Rose_instructions
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held43
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rose_instructions

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

1,02111,0386,029.57 August 2026 — 1,188 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,188 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,182 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,175 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,169 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,164 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,159 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,156 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,136 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,111 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,021 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,038 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,998 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,946 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,918 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,903 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,861 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,791 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,760 subscribers12 October 2026 — 10,718 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,703 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,690 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,678 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,657 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,648 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,611 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,581 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,544 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,494 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,445 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,374 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,353 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,312 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,281 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,268 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,255 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,239 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,230 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,220 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,212 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,125 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,065 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,888 subscribers9,8887 August 20266 November 2026
43 measurements spanning 91 days, net +8,700. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 01:169,888-177
4 Nov 2026, 23:1010,065-60
3 Nov 2026, 22:4010,125-87
2 Nov 2026, 20:5810,212-8
1 Nov 2026, 19:0110,220-10
31 Oct 2026, 18:3910,230-9
30 Oct 2026, 17:3810,239-16
29 Oct 2026, 16:5110,255-13
28 Oct 2026, 18:5810,268-13
27 Oct 2026, 19:5010,281-31
26 Oct 2026, 16:4710,312-41
25 Oct 2026, 14:0610,353-21
24 Oct 2026, 15:3510,374-71
23 Oct 2026, 12:3610,445-49
22 Oct 2026, 12:0510,494-50
21 Oct 2026, 08:3610,544-37
20 Oct 2026, 06:2510,581-30
19 Oct 2026, 08:1710,611-37
18 Oct 2026, 07:3410,648-9
17 Oct 2026, 08:4510,657first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.12%
avg views ÷ 9,888 subscribers
Avg views / post
110
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held44 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total2,761
Reactions total78
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 20:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 36 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5849.2%
👍1411.9%
🔥1210.2%
🤔108.47%
😢54.24%
😎43.39%
❤‍🔥32.54%
💯32.54%
😈32.54%
🍾21.69%
🕊21.69%
🐳10.847%
😭10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (4.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 16:53 UTC33 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

رو هفتاد هزاد میبینمتون @Rose_instructions

👍3❤1🤔1

5 Nov 2026, 15:46 UTC42 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🔻فوری وزارت خارجه روسیه پس از دیدار اضطراری پوتین و محسن رضایی، اعلام کرد: شهروندان روسیه تا اطلاع ثانوی به ایران سفر نکنند ریزش شدید بازار استاک آمریکا بعد از باز شدن بازم احتمال وقوع جنگ رو بشدت بالا نشون میده @Rose_instructions

🔥6

4 Nov 2026, 04:21 UTC63 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026

پیروزی دمکرات ها میتونه یه موج نزولی جدی برای بیتکوین ایجاد کنه !! @Rose_instructions

❤4🤔1

4 Nov 2026, 04:07 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026

اینم از نتیجه انتخابات آمریکا!!!! @Rose_instructions

❤1

4 Nov 2026, 04:06 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuruPhoto

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Democrats win both the US House and Senate, seizing control from Republicans. @WatcherGuru

❤1

30 Oct 2026, 14:28 UTC112 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

طلا ورود خوبی میتونه بده @Rose_instructions

👍2❤1

30 Oct 2026, 09:51 UTC106 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026

یه جورایی تو توییت ایلان ماسک رو تهدید هم کرده گفته سهام اسپیس ایکس (شرکت ایلان ماسک) که بایننس داره بیشتر از یک میلیارد دلاره و لازم باشه میفروشه @Rose_instructions

❤3

30 Oct 2026, 09:46 UTC107 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

ایلان ماسک داره از دیشب به هک شدن بایننس نیش و کنایه میزنه دیگه cz عصابی شده انگار، میگه به جای این حرفا Show a little support. @Rose_instructions

❤3

29 Oct 2026, 21:28 UTC89 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

سی زی تایید کرد. @Rose_instructions

❤4

29 Oct 2026, 21:09 UTC71 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: Tether freezes $971 million $USDT linked to suspected Binance hack. No official statement from Binance yet. @WatcherGuru

❤2

29 Oct 2026, 21:09 UTC91 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026

دو میلیارد و سیصد میلیون دلار هک شد در مجموع ۶۴ ارز مختلف روی نتورک اتریوم ⭕️🚨🚨 @Rose_instructions

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @Rose_instructions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

👑Trading1room👑
@trading1room · 22,730
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rose instructions🌹” (@Rose_instructions), 9,888 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rose_instructions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.