Channel
@RoshdKonimBaHam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
666subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001328604329 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RoshdKonimBaHam |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RoshdKonimBaHam |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 666 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 667 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 671 | +8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 663 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 662 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 661 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
123 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 67 | 54.5% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 15.4% | |
| 👌 | 15 | 12.2% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 5.69% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 4.88% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.25% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.813% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.813% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.813% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.813% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.813% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RoshdKonimBaHam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔮 سواد واقعی یعنی شجاعت بیرحمانه در باورزدایی، یعنی توانایی فرو ریختن ساختارهای ذهنی کهنهای که دیگر حقیقت ندارند، حتی اگر هویتمان به آنها گره خورده باشد. ✍🏻 نسیم نیکُلاس طالب (درست گفتم آیا؟!) 🔮 شعور اگر باشد، عقیده خطرناک نمیشود؛ اما وقتی شعور نباشد، هر عقیدهای میتواند اسلحه شود. ✍🏻 محمد جهانفر #رشد_کنیم_باهم
👍5
گاهی وقتها از سیاهی روح بشر میترسم و فکر میکنم که اون مانع از تعالیش میشه. وحشتناکتر اینکه بشر رو این حرکاتش اسم دلاوری و پیروزی میذاره. من تعریف میکنم که طرف دیگه پیروزی، شکسته. اگر بنا باشه انتخاب کنم شکست رو میپذیرم و ترجیح میدم نابود بشم تا نابود بکنم؛ من مسئول جنگ رو، مردها میدونم، اگر زنها دنیا رو اداره میکردن جنگ وجود نداشت. مردها دنیا رو به جهانگشایی و تسلط نیروی خودشون میخوان، چون نیرو کم دارن. ا…
👍4👏1
🔮 سوال: ده نفر شورشی دارید. دوتا رو میکشید. چند تا باقی میمونه؟ هشت تا؟ خیر. اشتباهه! اون دو نفری که کشتید هر کدوم ۶ تا دوست یا برادر دارن که برای پیوستن به شورش مردد بودن ولی وقتی دوستشون رو کشتید، شما براشون تصمیم گرفتید. در محاسبات ضد شورش، ده منهای دو میشه بیست. 🎥 دیالوگ War Machine #رشد_کنیم_باهم
👍5
یک هدف برای خود مشخص کنید و برای رسیدن به آن خود را منضبط کنید. در غیر این صورت باید عواقب آن را متحمل شوید. عواقب آن چیست؟ مواجهه با همهی رنجهای زندگی بدون دستیابی به هیچ معنایی. توصیف بهتری از جهنم سراغ دارید؟ 📘 فراتر از نظم ✍🏻 جردن پیترسون #رشد_کنیم_باهم
👍4😱1
🔮 حساسیت و از بین رفتن پوستِ روانی: برای بعضی آدمها یک انتقاد ساده، یک پیام بیپاسخ، یک بحث کوچک یا حتی یک نگاه سرد میتواند ساعتها یا روزها ذهنشان را درگیر کند. اما چرا؟ آیا آنها بیش از حد حساس هستند؟ علوم اعصاب پاسخ پیچیدهتری میدهد. وقتی سیستم عصبی برای مدت طولانی در معرض استرس، ناامنی، طرد شدن، تحقیر یا آسیبهای عاطفی قرار میگیرد، مغز یاد میگیرد همیشه منتظر خطر باشد. در چنین شرایطی، آمیگدال مغز؛ بخشی ک…
👍4👌2
آیا کسی رنج مرا میبیند؟! 🎨 لوکا پونزاتو لطفا نظر و حستون در مورد نقاشی بالا رو بنویسید 🙏🏻 #رشد_کنیم_باهم
💔4🔥3❤2
🔮 ما با هم عبور خواهیم کرد از دردها و بحرانها با هم عبور خواهیم کرد از تغییراتی که لازم است انجام دهیم، با هم گذر خواهیم کرد از هر لحظهی این زندگی غیرقابل پیشبینی. 📘 تکههایی از یک کل منسجم ✍🏻 پونه مقیمی #رشد_کنیم_باهم
👍3👌1🕊1
ایران، عرفان طهماسبی 🦋 @RoshdKonimBaHam
❤2
اصطلاح healthy shame یعنی خجالتی که سالمه، فردی که این احساس خجالت رو داره هرگز، هرگز، هرگز به حریم کسی تجاوز نمیکنه، به کسی نمیگه چرا درس نمیخونی؟ نمیگه چرا ازدواج نمیکنی؟ نمیگه چرا بچهدار نمیشی؟ چرا فلان تغییر رو تو ظاهرت به وجود نمیاری؟ چون این سوالات مثل اینه که انگشت تو چشم اون آدم کردید و متاسفانه بسیاری از ما به دلیل اینکه healthy shame نداریم به خودمون اجازه میدیم هر سوالی رو از هر کسی و هر جایی بکنیم. ه…
👍4
🔮 و جنگ همان واژه تلخ و سیاهی است که جز مرگ و ویرانی ارمغانی بههمراه ندارد؛ همانقدر پوچ، همانقدر سیاه... 📘 مجموعه داستان انتهای فردا ✍🏻 بهاره منفرد #رشد_کنیم_باهم
👍9🤓1
وقتی انسان ببری را بکشد، نامش را تمرین مردانگی میگذارند. ولی وقتی ببری انسان را بدرد نام اینکار را توحش و آدمخواری مینهند. تفاوت جنایت و عدالت هم در قاموس بشر بیش از این نیست... ✍🏻 جرج برنارد شاو #رشد_کنیم_باهم
😢7👍2💔2
🔮 وظیفه اصلی ذهن ما تفکر است. ذهن ما، این کار را مدام و بیوقفه انجام میدهد. بعضی از این افکار، منطقی و بعضی دیگر بیمنطق هستند. بعضی از افکار به حل مشکلات کمک میکنند و بعضی نیز با ایجاد ترس، عملکرد ما را مختل میکنند. گاهی افکارمان ما را به سمت دریای موفقیت سوق میدهند و زمانی کشتی زندگیمان را به گل مینشانند. 📘 رهایی از زندان ذهن ✍🏻 متیو مک می #رشد_کنیم_باهم
👌5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RoshdKonimBaHam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رشد کنیم با هم” (@RoshdKonimBaHam), 666 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RoshdKonimBaHam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.