💬 گفتوگوهای سیامک و تهمورث 2️⃣ بخش دوم: بهکارگیری واژههای بیگانه، چه آسیبهایی به زبان میرساند؟ @Parsi_Sareh @Rostami_Siamak
❤21👍9👏4🔥2👌1💯1🤩1

Channel
@Rostami_Siamak
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
10,517subscribers
+84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002149071433 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rostami_Siamak |
| Description | در گسترش و گوالش زبان پارسی و فرهنگ ایرانشهری Дар густаришу гуволиши забони Порсӣ ва фарҳанги Эроншаҳрӣ |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rostami_Siamak |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:48 | 10,517 | -2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:05 | 10,519 | +9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:21 | 10,510 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:34 | 10,509 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:39 | 10,513 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:39 | 10,512 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:34 | 10,515 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 10,519 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:37 | 10,520 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 17:18 | 10,523 | +3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:50 | 10,520 | +6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 10,514 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:28 | 10,513 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 10,514 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:08 | 10,517 | +3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:07 | 10,514 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 10,519 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:49 | 10,528 | +3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 10,525 | +2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:41 | 10,523 | first reading |
102 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 102 (31 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 56,827 |
| Reactions total | 2,413 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 09:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,882 reactions across 102 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,444 | 38.8% | |
| 👍 | 2,851 | 32.1% | |
| 👏 | 1,203 | 13.5% | |
| 🔥 | 261 | 2.94% | |
| 👌 | 234 | 2.63% | |
| 👎 | 212 | 2.39% | |
| 💯 | 124 | 1.40% | |
| 🙏 | 98 | 1.10% | |
| 🕊 | 91 | 1.02% | |
| 🏆 | 71 | 0.799% | |
| 😍 | 61 | 0.687% | |
| 🤷♂ | 49 | 0.552% | |
| 🫡 | 36 | 0.405% | |
| 🤯 | 26 | 0.293% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 0.18% | |
| 💔 | 15 | 0.169% | |
| 😎 | 15 | 0.169% | |
| 😡 | 13 | 0.146% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 0.146% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 0.113% | |
| 7 further kinds | 39 | 0.439% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,882 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (6.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💬 گفتوگوهای سیامک و تهمورث 2️⃣ بخش دوم: بهکارگیری واژههای بیگانه، چه آسیبهایی به زبان میرساند؟ @Parsi_Sareh @Rostami_Siamak
❤21👍9👏4🔥2👌1💯1🤩1
تازهترین سخنان استاد میرجلالالدین کزازی • آنچه فردوسی برای ایران کرد و مصر از آن ناکام ماند. • والاترین ستایش، ستایشی است که از سوی دشمن باشد. @Rostami_Siamak
❤33👏5🔥5👌2👍2👎2🏆1💯1
💬 گفتوگوهای سیامک و تهمورث 1️⃣ بخش یکم: چرا باید بکوشیم زبانمان، کمتر واژههای بیگانه داشته باشد؟ کوششهای سرهگرایانه چه سودی دارند؟ @Parsi_Sareh @Rostami_Siamak
❤38👏13👍7🔥4🏆1👌1💯1😍1
🔻 واژههای دساتیری چیست؟ واژههای دساتیری آن دسته واژههاست که در کتاب دساتیر، نوشتهٔ آذرکیوان در روزگار شاه عباس یکم صفوی، در شهر پتنه هندوستان، برای جایگزینی واژههای بیگانه با پارسی سره ساخته و پیشنهاد شد. چون بسیاری از آنها ریشهشناسی دانشی درستی نداشت و برساخته بود، واژههایی ناراستین شناخته میشوند. این واژهها پسانها از راه واژهنامهها به سرودهٔ چامهسرایانِ روزگار بازگشت ادبی راه یافت. 🔻 کتاب دساتیر دربا…
❤10👍6👌2🏆1👏1💯1🔥1🙏1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6💯1🔥1🤩1🥰1😍1😘1
Voice message, posted without a caption
👏5❤1❤🔥1🔥1🤩1🥰1😍1
«رَو» یا «رُو»؟ 🤔 چرا «رو» در «پیرُو» و «پیرَوی» دو خوانش دارد؟ واژگانی چون «پیشرو»، «رهرو»، «پیرو» و... از «رَو» (rav)، بُنِ اکنونِ رفتن، ساخته شدهاند. خوانش آغازین این واژگان، چنانکه در تاجیکستان نیز همچنان رایج است، چنین بوده است: • پیشرَو (pišrav) • رهرَو (rahrav) • پیرَو (peyrav) در ساخت کارواژههای زمان اکنون نیز همین خوانش را میبینیم: • می+رَو+اَم • می+رَو+ی • می+رَو+د در گویش تهرانی، هن…
❤50👏17👍8🔥4🙏2🏆1👌1👎1
💠 هم ارز پارسی واژگان بیگانه را از کجا بیابیم؟ واژهگزینی نیازمند دانش و کارشناسی است. تنها دلبستگی به زبان پارسی برای این کار بسنده نیست. برای این آرمان، فرهنگهای زیر نوشته شده است که بسیار سودمندند: 🔻 فرهنگ واژهیاب از ابوالقاسم پرتو: t.me/Rostami_Siamak/830 🔻 فرهنگ پارسی سره از فریده رازی: t.me/Rostami_Siamak/849 🔻 واژهنامۀ پارسی سره از فرهنگستان زبان پارسی: t.me/Rostami_Siamak/327 همارز پارسی بسیاری از …
❤26👍9🙏4🔥3🏆1👎1👏1💯1
شگفتآور است که بیت «چو ایران نباشد تن من مباد / بدین بوم و بر زنده یک تن مباد» در کتاب پارسی پایهٔ پنجم دبستان به فردوسی نسبت داده میشود، با آنکه این بیت در شاهنامه نیست! به نوشتهٔ زندهیاد ابوالفضل خطیبی، مصراع نخست دگرگونشدهٔ این بیت در داستان رستم و سهراب است: نباشد به ایران تن من مباد چنین دارم از موبد پاک یاد اما مصراع دوم در شاهنامه نیست! پژوهش خطیبی نشان میدهد این سروده در روزگار معاصر پدید آمده است: د…
❤56👍50👏10👌4🔥4🙏2🏆1👎1
اینکه بهجای «سلام» میگویی «درود»، اما بهجای «پیام» میگویی «تِکست» و بهجای «دیدار» میگویی «دِیت»، نشان میدهد که تو دلواپس زبان پارسی نیستی، بلکه در پیِ خودنمایی هستی! وگرنه بیگانه، بیگانه است؛ چه عربی و ترکی باشد، چه انگلیسی و فرانسهای! #تلنگر @Rostami_Siamak
👏70❤55👍20👌6👎3🔥3💯2🏆1
🍃 چرا به جای «نه»، میگوییم «خیر»؟ آیا تاکنون اندیشیدهاید که چرا در زبان پارسی، گاهی به جای «نه»، واژهٔ «خیر» یا «نهخیر» را به کار میبریم؟ واژهٔ «خیر» در زبان عربی به معنای نیکی و خوبی است (دربرابر واژهٔ «شر») و در زبان پارسی نیز همین معنا را دارد؛ اما نیک میدانیم که این واژه در پارسی، به معنای «نه» نیز به کار رفته است. بر پایهٔ دیدگاهی دربارهٔ ریشهٔ این کاربرد، از روزگار صفویان، واژهٔ «نه» را دارای بار شوم می…
❤54👏16👍9🤯6🔥4🫡3🙏2🏆1
«پارسی» یا «فارسی»؟ پرسمان این است! من نیز برپایهٔ سخنان استاد علیاشرف صادقی، فرستهٔ زیر را ساخته بودم: 🆔 t.me/Rostami_Siamak/731 گفتنی است که علامه دهخدا نیز، «فارسی» را عربیشدهٔ «پارسی» دانسته است: واژهنامهٔ دهخدا فارسی. ( ص نسبی ) منسوب به فارس که فارسیان و ممالک آنها باشد. ( منتهی الارب ). معرب پارسی. ایرانی. ( حاشیه برهان چ معین : پارس ). فارس. عجم. رجوع به عجم وفارس شود. ولی چه «فارسی» فرگشتِ زاستاریِ زبان…
❤44👏12👌4👍4🔥4👎2❤🔥1🏆1
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @Rostami_Siamak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Rostami_Siamak edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤔 شما با کدام دیدگاه همسوترید؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سیامک رستمی” (@Rostami_Siamak), 10,517 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rostami_Siamak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.