Channel
@RozemJai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
82subscribers
+22 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004427784544 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RozemJai |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RozemJai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 82 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 81 | +7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 74 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 71 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 67 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 60 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 60 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
169 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5453930874699542906 | 74 | 43.8% | |
| custom 5469830422722539278 | 40 | 23.7% | |
| custom 5456426108964595077 | 35 | 20.7% | |
| custom 5195116549169520287 | 14 | 8.28% | |
| custom 5195237817571123105 | 5 | 2.96% | |
| custom 5453961291657937979 | 1 | 0.592% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RozemJai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
детвора, я села за просмотр видео-гайдов по TavoAi мозг уже в отрицании чего-то нового mmmmmm, hyita 👍 ладно. через неможу, через щирохи, до кинця
custom 54539308746995429067custom 51952378175711231055
СЕРИЯ БОТОВ #HouseOfCougar🕯️ 🌟Что мы имеем на сегодня? 4 бота по всем отпрыскам королевской семьи: 1️⃣🅰️ АНИСА | ЖЕСТОКАЯ ПРИВЯЗАННОСТЬ 2️⃣🅰️ДРИТАН | РАСПУТНЫЙ ПРИНЦ 3️⃣🅰️ИЛАРИЙ | СЛОМАННЫЙ ПРИНЦ 4️⃣🅰️ИЛАРИЙ | ALT | МИРНОЕ НЕБО 🌟Нетронутыми остались только родители этих троих — Саерон и Милена. Но, учитывая, что это возрастные персонажи, вряд ли у вас возникнет большая потребность в создании ботов по их история…
custom 54698304227225392785custom 54564261089645950771
джани, как всегда, зажопил мне гифку сколько бы я не пыжилась в уменьшении ее веса для анкеты персонажа, у меня все по нулям ну, благо могу выставить сюда и вам показать ✨🤲🏻✨
custom 54539308746995429063custom 54564261089645950771custom 54698304227225392781
Posted without readable text
custom 54539308746995429064custom 54564261089645950773custom 54698304227225392781
в 22:00 по Мск времени ждите Дритана все написано... осталось перевести, оформить и привести в божеский вид😎
custom 54539308746995429069custom 54564261089645950771custom 54698304227225392781
У меня назрел вопрос👀 Большая часть моих ботов построена так, что я не прописываю заранее ваш статус и отношения с персонажем. Каждое стартовое сообщение с разными вариантами истории, где есть возможность самому задать динамику. Как вы относитесь к такому формату? Или вам иногда хочется видеть ботов с одной, заранее заданной сюжетной линией и уже сформировавшимися отношениями между персонажами?
custom 54539308746995429061custom 54564261089645950771custom 54698304227225392781
Сейчас я хочу отвлечься от всего на свете и просто писать бота. Если совсем головой двинусь — бот выйдет уже в субботу вечером. Если нет — в понедельник😇
custom 545393087469954290611custom 54564261089645950772custom 54698304227225392781
Пока в опросе лидируют Демон и Дритан, я решила пересмотреть внешность второго. Дритан — один из персонажей моей старой серии ботов House Of Cougar. Его внешность я создавала в самом начале без ума, потому что не планировала делать отдельную серию по этому дому, а значит, и его собственного бота. Но благодаря вашим запросам и популярности серии стало понятно, что его очередь рано или поздно всё равно наступит 🫡 Пер…
custom 54539308746995429066custom 54564261089645950773custom 54698304227225392783
мда, Фрида выглядит супер-нишево на фоне наших мужчин со своими 214 сообщениями ну ничего, для мамы она всё равно самая лучшая😑
custom 519511654916952028710custom 54564261089645950771custom 54698304227225392781
Даже не знаю, какие слова подобрать На канале вас уже перевалило за 50🍦 Этому месту чуть больше месяца, и я вообще не думала, что всё так сложится. Спасибо маме, спасибо папе, спасибо господубогу и 🌺@tezyyMAO 🌺 за то, что подтолкнула меня к созданию канала. Теперь мы с вами всегда на связи. И совсем недавно 💖@katniss_everdrink 💖лишила меня звёздной невинности — так что я благодаря ей заработала свои первые звёзды…
custom 54539308746995429069custom 54698304227225392783custom 54564261089645950772
Posted without readable text
Выбираем следующего бота💄
The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @RozemJai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбираем следующего бота💄
The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ROZEM jai” (@RozemJai), 82 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RozemJai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.