Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RUMBLE💹

Channel

RUMBLE💹

@Rumble001

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,945subscribers

-79 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002120083407
TypeChannel
Username@Rumble001
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rumble001

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,9454,0243,984.57 August 2026 — 4,024 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,020 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,017 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,015 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,010 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,999 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,992 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,990 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,978 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,972 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,962 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,953 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,945 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,933–4,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 15:183,945-8
11 Sept 2026, 17:003,953-9
7 Sept 2026, 09:373,962-10
2 Sept 2026, 03:573,972-6
30 Aug 2026, 12:133,978-12
27 Aug 2026, 09:283,990-2
24 Aug 2026, 04:323,992-7
20 Aug 2026, 21:163,999-11
18 Aug 2026, 06:024,010-5
14 Aug 2026, 19:174,015-2
11 Aug 2026, 08:424,017-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:314,020-4
7 Aug 2026, 12:484,024first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥964.3%
😭321.4%
👎17.14%
😁17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC158 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2082083679115895110

Signed Dee empress 💀 I will never message you

26 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC228 viewsread 8 August 2026

This might turn out to cook pretty soon one address. every chain. one inbox. 📥 join @evmdotchat early access with my code EVM-WBMZ → evm.chat/early https://x.com/evmdotchat/status/2081320842483441915

Signed BigTudor

23 Jul 2026, 01:11 UTC271 viewsread 8 August 2026

Bm4Czuq3X7BwgU429GiLb8wTHLNBiCzcysN8Gsqpump Look for an entry

Signed BigTudor

20 Jun 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,740 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

BEXFEjrXQviyK6BaRF4NgwEXWQf9kmCBuoj91R62pump

👎1

Signed Dee empress 💀 I will never message you

19 Jun 2026, 15:43 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 8 August 2026

Farm did so well today Watching the market we could be back 🤣

Signed Dee empress 💀 I will never message you

10 Jun 2026, 08:30 UTC≈1,870 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Sorrows sorrows prayers The market is crazy atm

😭3

Signed Dee empress 💀 I will never message you

10 Jun 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,830 viewsread 8 August 2026

Touched 450k mc Back to 150 Nice dip

Signed Dee empress 💀 I will never message you

10 Jun 2026, 08:18 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 8 August 2026

3yXxBGsxHbY6KU6SHpAcQhRzQyq86ngnfZiesuiLfJYn Justice for stephen

Signed Dee empress 💀 I will never message you

9 Jun 2026, 06:38 UTC≈1,750 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Sorrows sorrows prayers🤣🤣 It was too good to be trueee🤣🤣

😁1

Signed Dee empress 💀 I will never message you

9 Jun 2026, 06:18 UTC≈1,710 viewsread 8 August 2026

There was a dump 🤣 It dumped back to 300k and its back to 1m 🤣🤣🤣

Signed Dee empress 💀 I will never message you

9 Jun 2026, 06:17 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ath 2.1m

Signed Dee empress 💀 I will never message you

9 Jun 2026, 06:09 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 8 August 2026

From 238k to 1.1m

Signed Dee empress 💀 I will never message you

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Rumble001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Blessed labs 𓃵
@Blessedmemecalls · 24,741
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
DAVE'S CHANNEL
@Davecall1 · 41,331
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
Skill Afrika
@LaptopLaivstyle · 43,692
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
House Of Xeus📉📈
@HouseOfXeus · 25,080
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
Prophetic Chants MEDIA
@prophetichants · 29,356
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Kagan & His Crypto Bestfriends
@kaganandhiscryptobestfriends · 52,773
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Crypto With Shola
@cryptowithshola · 113,313
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
TRADING ARENA
@kelvin_talent · 81,806
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
Jobs With Aramide
@jobswitharamide · 26,552
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 September 2026
FarmercistJournal
@farmercistjournal0 · 40,843
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Techriz💯📈
@Techriztm · 46,321
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
BMS CRYPTO
@bloomstarbms · 25,267
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
Revivalhub International
@revivalhubinternational · 30,384
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026
Crypto_Mama| MemeCoin, Defi & Airdrop
@Cryptomama100 · 27,539
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
Apostle Femi Lazarus messages
@Femilazarusmessages · 90,519
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RUMBLE💹” (@Rumble001), 3,945 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rumble001.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.