Channel
@Russian_m0ther
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,931subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001975423718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Russian_m0ther |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Russian_m0ther |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 1,931 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 1,929 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 1,931 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 1,932 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1,933 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:10 | 1,933 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
154 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 29.2% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 25.3% | |
| 💘 | 39 | 25.3% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 9.09% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 5.19% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 4.55% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.649% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗️‼️❗️ Мы ломаем систему. И да, это наш «Нулевой» выпуск 📰 Мы долго думали. Наблюдали. Анализировали. Пока все вокруг кладут в упаковку с товаром стандартные листовки (которые, честно говоря, мы все привыкли выбрасывать, даже не дочитав до середины), мы задались другим вопросом. Зачем создавать то, чему суждено отправиться в мусорное ведро через секунду? Я категорически не хотела делать «ещё одну бумажку». Мне х…
💘7🔥6👍2❤1
Posted without readable text
❤11👍4💘4
Posted without readable text
❤🔥8👍5💘3❤1
Реклама, за которую мне не заплатят💞 💓Майки LOO. Мы познакомились с ними на маркете в том году. Плотный хлопок, который не превращается в тряпочку после третьей стирки. И лекала супер-классные. Майка была для младшего, но отжала старшая: «она красивая». Спорить бессмысленно, потому что правда. А ещё LOO собирали образы для нашей фотосессии новой премиальной коллекции гамаков на коляску. Так что их вещи вы увидите…
❤4👍4💘2
Подробности тут
👍8❤3💘3
Залетаем с 2х ног на wb Я обещаю больше не нигативить на маркетплейсы, если хоть немного защитят селлеров 🪄
💘5❤2👍2
Русская мать 🪆 pinned a photo
Русская мать 🪆 pinned a photo
Wildberries не будет компенсировать потери за товары с атакованных складов. Падение БПЛА и других осколков прописаны компанией как форс-мажоры, освобождающие её от ответственности. @bankrollo
❤3😢3👍2💘1
😡😡😡😡😡😡 Распаковала тот самый возврат. На камеру. И знаете, что я почувствовала? Что копаюсь в грязном белье Озона. Буквально: достаю из коробки чужую грязную чёрную майку — и будто перебираю руками всю их безответственность. И совесть. Хотя нет, совести в коробке не оказалось — только майка. Теперь по уликам, потому что это уже детектив: 🛍Возврат приехал в пакете… из ВкусВилла. Серьёзно. Это коллаборация такая? «…
👍6😢4❤2💘1🙈1
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥. ❤️омните пост, где я плакала над куском чёрной тряпки? Так вот. Теперь про это написали в журнале «Аргумент Медиа». Они выпустил большое расследование — «Пустая коробка: кто на самом деле подменяет товар на маркетплейсах». И моя история там тоже: тряпка вместо Гамака с пометкой «товар поддельный». Ну что же короткое резюме этой ситуации с разных сторон: 🔴Мы не одни, и мы не сходим с ума. Во всей цепочки к…
💘9❤8🔥7👍3🤣1
❤️ столько всего было в июне и начале июля, аж голова кругом — мероприятия, встречи, беготня... Но сейчас я просто выдыхаю и кайфую. Дети — это моё, это вообще бесценно. Ну и пусть устала, зато счастливая.😄
❤10💘4👍3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Russian_m0ther. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Русская мать 🪆” (@Russian_m0ther), 1,931 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Russian_m0ther.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.