Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Италія-Россія

Channel

Италія-Россія

@RusskijItaljanec

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

579subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001990729564
TypeChannel
Username@RusskijItaljanec
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RusskijItaljanec

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

560579569.56 August 2026 — 562 subscribers6 August 2026 — 562 subscribers15 August 2026 — 560 subscribers22 August 2026 — 561 subscribers30 August 2026 — 562 subscribers9 September 2026 — 577 subscribers15 September 2026 — 579 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 557–582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 20:21579+2
9 Sept 2026, 02:39577+15
30 Aug 2026, 04:28562+1
22 Aug 2026, 17:37561+1
15 Aug 2026, 05:12560-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:16562no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:46562first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3428.8%
🤔3025.4%
🔥1512.7%
👍119.32%
👏86.78%
👌65.08%
😁32.54%
🙏32.54%
💯21.69%
🤝21.69%
🤨21.69%
👎10.847%
😨10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 04:37 UTC107 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://telegra.ph/Rossiya-ne-yavlyaetsya-antitezoj-Evropy-07-24

🤔2👏1

24 Jul 2026, 07:43 UTC205 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Еще меня поражаетъ маніакальность, съ которою евразійцы (и не только) относятся къ «цивилизаціонному подходу». Всё сводится къ цивилизаціонному вопросу, что, въ принципѣ, имѣетъ мѣсто, но, съ другой стороны, идеологичность такого примѣненія очевидна. Она во многомъ такъ или иначе отсылаетъ къ большевизму, якобы подчёркивая уникальность и самостоятельность Россіи какъ цивилизаціи — какъ мы уже замѣчали, тезисъ «Россія

🤔3🤝21👏1🤨1

24 Jul 2026, 05:37 UTC187 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Нѣсколько замѣтокъ о евразійствѣ. Не перестаетъ меня изумлять то, что: 1) евразійство и славянофильство считаются очень близкими парадигмами; 2) евразійцы весьма идеологически-произвольно выбираютъ этимологіи, культурныя черты и обычаи, якобы обосновываювщіе ихъ теоріи. Почему-то тому, что какія-то русскія слова произошли отъ восточныхъ языковъ, должно слѣдовать, что русская "цивилизація" не европейская (а что дѣлать

5🔥4👍1🤨1

22 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC172 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

У большевиковъ и совѣтофиловъ для оправданія переворота 17го года и сохраненія послѣдующаго статусъ-кво используется якобы пронаціональный аргументъ, который можно резюмировать такъ: «Если ты настоящій "бѣлый"-патріотъ своей страны, ты долженъ встать на нашу сторону, такъ какъ сопротивляться большевизму и СССР на дѣлѣ означаетъ навредить Россіи». Очень часто эта мысль приводится въ дебатахъ о Гражданской войнѣ. Основ

8🔥1🤔1

21 Jul 2026, 04:48 UTC193 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://s-t-o-l.com/kultura/69857-gvido-morselli-vera-istoriya-i-posledniy-chelovek/ Разсказалъ объ очень интересномъ писателѣ Гвидо Морселли. Также перевёлъ его разсказъ Великая встрѣча, въ которой представлены встрѣча и діалогъ Пія XII и Джугашвили.

🔥6

16 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC272 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

У меня два переводческихъ прожекта, но я давно не могу заниматься только переводами, мнѣ нужно постоянно писать что-то своё. Обычно "неписатели" приходятъ къ сочиненію художественной литтературы спустя множество посвященныхъ изслѣдованіямъ лѣтъ, но, въ общемъ, насколько мнѣ извѣстно, не существуетъ запрещающихъ каноновъ. Скорѣе напишу романъ.

10👏1

16 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC256 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Я уже выслалъ текстъ второй книги издателю — рѣчь идётъ о продолженіи Россіи въ зеркалѣ. Чѣмъ мнѣ далѣе заняться, по-прежнему эссе или романомъ (написано уже 70 страницъ)?

  1. Эссе37%
  2. Романъ63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC269 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Случайно наткнулся на Русскій романъ Каррера и прочёлъ его (на итальянскомъ). Произведеніе интересно, то же самое можно сказать о его сюжетѣ. Въ этой художественной автобіографіи авторъ впервые заговариваетъ о семейной тайнѣ, связанной съ его (материнскимъ) дѣдушкой. Для преодолѣнія съ этимъ родственникомъ связанныхъ небезоснованныхъ саморазрушительныхъ отрицательныхъ импульсовъ герой берется за изученіе русскаго язы

👌5👏1

14 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC179 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @cousnaitsophe_thoughtsPhoto

Нашёлъ у Гоголя въ изданіи 1900 г. интересное. Обратите вниманіе, что слово нѣтъ въ рѣчи нѣмца Гибнера пишется какъ нетъ. А всё потому, что ѣ всегда смягчалъ согласную передъ нимъ, а вотъ е использовался и для звука /э/. Въ нѣмецкомъ же согласные не смягчаются, и потому, чтобы передать это, Гибнеръ въ текстѣ Гоголя говоритъ именно нетъ (чит. /нэт/). Всегда говорю, что ѣ есть знакъ фонетическій въ той же мѣрѣ, что и

6🤔2

10 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC202 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ruinaissance_PublisherPhoto

Дорогие читатели! Этим жарким июльским днём мы представляем очередную жаркую новинку лета 2026 года. Книга Михаила Константиновича Первухина "Жемчужное ожерелье" с подзаголовком "роман из жизни богемы". Книга была издана в Риге в издательстве М. Дидковского в 1936 и больше не переиздавался. Перед Вами – первое издание романа в России. На фотографии - то самое единственное издание романа и наша книга. Текста "Жемчужно

4👏1

8 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC208 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://s-t-o-l.com/tserkov/69571-raskol-v-katolicheskoy-tserkvi/ Написалъ объ этомъ статью.

🙏3

7 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC241 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

О современномъ идеалѣ соборности Его можно описать слѣдующей картиной. Въ центрѣ города находятся памятники и зданія администраціи и партіи. Возлѣ нихъ — церковь, мечеть, синагога и идолы. Священники, раввины, муфтiи и жрецы работаютъ въ бюрократическихъ-партійныхъ аппаратахъ. Обычно послѣ работы заходятъ въ соотвѣтствующія учрежденія, выполняютъ продиктованныя собственной ролью обязанности, послѣ чего направляются

🤔3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @RusskijItaljanec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

Я уже выслалъ текстъ второй книги издателю — рѣчь идётъ о продолженіи Россіи въ зеркалѣ. Чѣмъ мнѣ далѣе заняться, по-прежнему эссе или романомъ (написано уже 70 страницъ)?

  1. Эссе37%
  2. Романъ63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Италія-Россія” (@RusskijItaljanec), 579 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RusskijItaljanec.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.