Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ryaba8_⚽️🏆

Channel

Ryaba8_⚽️🏆

@Ryaba_8

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,792subscribers

-143 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002093203379
TypeChannel
Username@Ryaba_8
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ryaba_8

Growth

6,7926,9356,863.56 August 2026 — 6,935 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,935 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,933 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,924 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,899 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,880 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,868 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,856 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,839 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,829 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,811 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,792 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 28 days, net -143. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,771–6,956 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 10:436,792-19
31 Aug 2026, 02:546,811-18
28 Aug 2026, 11:046,829-10
25 Aug 2026, 20:056,839-17
22 Aug 2026, 22:466,856-12
19 Aug 2026, 22:356,868-12
16 Aug 2026, 18:046,880-19
12 Aug 2026, 18:236,899-25
9 Aug 2026, 13:116,924-9
6 Aug 2026, 08:506,933-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:176,935no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:356,935first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.4%
avg views ÷ 6,792 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held17 (13 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total4,358
Reactions total263
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 37s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,315 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
84864.5%
👍18614.1%
😁937.07%
👏574.33%
🔥312.36%
211.60%
❤‍🔥211.60%
🎉201.52%
🏆151.14%
💯70.532%
🙏70.532%
🤡40.304%
😎20.152%
🆒10.076%
🕊10.076%
🥰10.076%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,443 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC848 views88 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @Olenchenko2Video

Day in the life 👀

74👏9❤‍🔥5

11 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC≈1,800 views120 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Илюша, с повышением 👏 Работаем ✅🫡

👍8030❤‍🔥6😁4

10 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC≈1,710 views55 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Навестил Пермских чемпионов 💪 и своего хорошего друга 😊

👍3811❤‍🔥5👏1

7 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC≈2,110 views75 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Делаем только то, что приносит результат на поле! Запись на тренировку: [email protected]

58👍13❤‍🔥4

7 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈1,950 views78 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁5614👍8

6 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC≈1,030 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @amkalfcPhoto

⚡ WINNERS CLUB | ДЕНИС ГЛУШАКОВ Новый выпуск развлекательного шоу – с одним из лучших полузащитников в истории российского футбола. 📱 СМОТРЕТЬ В VK

25👍2

5 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,280 views63 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @danyaklenkin5Video

У меня тут случилась командировка в Ижевск. Съездили вместе с Рябой к Ниязу - тому самому пареньку, которому помогали всем медиафутболом. История очень эмоциональная для меня лично, но очень здорово, что всё так хорошо закончилось. Огромная благодарность всем, кто был небезразличен. Благодаря добрым людям такой день, как вчера, в принципе произошёл. Очень счастлив за своих друзей. Со связью проблемы были в поездке

👏3918🔥32🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,930 views93 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

66🔥13👍7🙏7

1 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC≈2,700 views106 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Обновил мячи для персональных тренировок 😇 Запись👇 [email protected]

74😁23👍9

30 Jul 2026, 18:56 UTC≈2,760 views89 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Непросто играть с Медийкой😁 100% 👏

72😁10👏7

30 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC≈2,650 views143 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

109👍187🏆3🔥2😎2❤‍🔥1🕊1

21 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC≈4,200 views164 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

С Днём Рождения АМКАЛ!🥳❤️🖤

135🎉20🏆9

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Ryaba_8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ФК БАНКА
@fcbench · 30,326
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Федос
@Fedos911 · 32,857
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Спиряков
@spiryakov · 40,951
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
Крысиный Эдем 🐀 | forzorezor (он же forz9r)
@forz9rr · 48,292
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ryaba8_⚽️🏆” (@Ryaba_8), 6,792 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ryaba_8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.