Channel
@SATjizzakhLC
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
946subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002487541667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SATjizzakhLC |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SATjizzakhLC |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 946 | +16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:35 | 930 | -6 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 22:35 | 936 | +4 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 05:56 | 932 | +7 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 925 | +8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 917 | +21 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 896 | -15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 911 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 912 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 922 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 929 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 931 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 931 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
339 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 112 | 33.0% | |
| 💯 | 49 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 10.3% | |
| 🤯 | 35 | 10.3% | |
| ⚡ | 29 | 8.55% | |
| 🎉 | 26 | 7.67% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 7.08% | |
| 🤩 | 19 | 5.60% | |
| 👌 | 10 | 2.95% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 339 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
— Bu yil yuqori SAT natija olib TOP universitetlarga topshirmoqchi bo'lgan o'quvchilarimiz yoki oldindan SAT dan yuqori natija naqd qilib qo'ymoqchi bo'lgan o'quvchilarni ertaga soat 10-00 dan markazimizda kutamiz ❗️ Ertaga soat 10:00 da "🔤🔤🔤🔤" darsimizga kelib o'zingizni qiziqtirgan savollarga javob olishingiz va SAT haqida batafsil tushunchalarni o'rganishingiz mumkin ! KELING, KO"RING, O'RGANING, VA ORZUINGIzDAGI…
🔥8🤯4👍3🎉2
➕Yangi o'quv markazimizda har kunlik yangi "INTENSIVE" kurslari ochilmoqda🆕 👨🏫 Teachers: Mr. Anvar SAT ss 1550 (750 english 800 Math) and Mr. Abdulkarimjon SAT ss 1530 (English - 740 math - 790) "INTENSIVE" guruhimiz haqida :👇 🗓 Darslar har kuni 10:00 - 12:00 🔔 Boshlanish vaqti: 3 - AVGUST 🗓Kurs davomiyligi: 3oy+ 🎓Bu kursda sizga nimalar taklif qilamiz: 🗓Darslar: Haftasiga 6 marotaba 🔔 Dars davomiyligi: 2- soat 👨…
🔥9⚡6👏5👍3🤩3👌1
New intensive group?
💯21🎉8👍4🔥3
📍 SATJIZZAKH endi yangi manzilda! Aziz o‘quvchilar va ota-onalar! Sizlarga xursandchilik bilan shuni ma'lum qilamizki, SATJIZZAKH Learning Center endi yanada qulay va zamonaviy yangi binoda faoliyat yuritadi. 🎉 Yangi manzilimizda sizlarni: ✨ Keng va yorug‘ auditoriyalar ✨ Qulay o‘quv muhiti ✨ Zamonaviy jihozlar ✨ Yanada yuqori sifatli ta'lim kutmoqda. 📍 Yangi manzil: https://maps.app.goo.gl/4SMp5hpCGHLzPgQ88?g_st…
🔥16👍6👌5👏5🤯3🎉1
Ruxsatnomalar bo’yicha ayrim tushuntirishlar #abituriyent 1️⃣ Barcha fandan milliy sertifikati bor va masalan, oldindan 189 ballni naqd qilib qo’ygan abituriyentlar uchun ruxsatnomalar chiqmaydi. Chunki ular testga kirmaydi, testga kirmagandan keyin ruxsatnoma ham shartmas; 2️⃣ Lekin SAT sertifikatidan 1200 balldan yuqori olgan abituriyentlar uchun ruxsatnoma chiqqan. Shu ko’pchilikni o’ylantirmoqda. Bu xatolik em…
👍4🔥3⚡2🎉2🤯1
➡️Super score 1️⃣4️⃣2️⃣0️⃣ 🥳 #results #SATjizzakh #2ndattempt 🎓O'quvchi: Kamron Almatov ⌛️Tayyorlangan kursi: ( SAT INTENSIVE ) 6 oy 🎉 📈Attempt: 2️⃣ Uning fikri: SATJizzakh is the best place to learn SAT. Because it provides everything to grow. I might not achieve it without the help of Abdulkarimjon and Anvar teachers. They know what they are doing. In addition, it has a great learning atmosphere ,and this made le…
🤯7🔥6⚡4🎉2👏1💯1
➡️1️⃣3️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ 🥳 #results #SATjizzakh #1stattempt 🎓O'quvchi: Muhriddin Baxriddinov ⌛️Tayyorlangan kursi: ( SAT INTENSIVE ) 3 oy 🎉 📈Attempt: 1️⃣ Uning fikri: The course provided me with a strong foundational framework and the confidence I needed to reach my target score. I truly appreciate your dedication and your teaching style. ❗️Siz ham yuqori natijalarga erishmoqchi bo'lsangiz biz bilan ular tomon ilk qadamingi…
🤯4⚡3💯3🔥2🎉1🤩1
➡️1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣0️⃣ 🥳 #results #SATjizzakh #1stattempt 🎓O'quvchi: Azizbek Xolmurodov ⌛️Tayyorlangan kursi: ( SAT INTENSIVE )3 1 oy 🎉 📈Attempt: 1️⃣ Uning fikri: Bir oyda shu natijaga erishdim. Tog'risi ulgurmasam kerak deb oylagandim lekin aynan shu SATjizzakh da o'qiganim qŏl keldi. Ustozlar hammaga katta raxmat . ❗️Siz ham yuqori natijalarga erishmoqchi bo'lsangiz biz bilan ular tomon ilk qadamingizni tashlang 😊 📍 M…
🔥4👏3⚡2🎉1👌1👍1🤩1🤯1
➡️1️⃣2️⃣2️⃣0️⃣ 🥳 #results #SATjizzakh #1stattempt 🎓O'quvchi: Odina Mamatqulova ⌛️Tayyorlangan kursi: ( SAT INTENSIVE )3 3 oy 🎉 📈Attempt: 1️⃣ Uning fikri: I really enjoyed this SAT course. The lessons were well-organized, and the teachers explained even difficult topics in a simple and understandable way. The practice materials were very helpful and closely matched the actual SAT. I also appreciated the support and …
🔥6🤩3🎉2👌2⚡1👍1💯1🤯1
➡️1️⃣2️⃣9️⃣0️⃣ 🥳 #results #SATjizzakh #1stattempt 🎓O'quvchi: Azamat Egamov ⌛️Tayyorlangan kursi: ( SAT INTENSIVE ) 3 oy 🎉 📈Attempt: 1️⃣ Uning fikri: I would like to say something about my SAT journey. It was harder than I thought, and I thought that if I self-studied for around 2–3 months, I could get 1200+. But during our SAT intensive course, I understood that without experienced mentors, it would be much harder …
🔥5⚡4🤯3👍1💯1🤩1
➡️1️⃣2️⃣7️⃣0️⃣ 🥳 #results #SATjizzakh #1stattempt 🎓O'quvchi: Madina Mukarova ⌛️Tayyorlangan kursi: ( SAT INTENSIVE ) 3 oy 🎉 📈Attempt: 1️⃣ Uning fikri: Preparing for the SAT was a challenging but rewarding experience. I am truly grateful to my teachers for their constant support, guidance, and encouragement throughout this journey. They always motivated me to do my best and helped me gain confidence in my abilities.…
👏7🔥5🎉2👍1🤩1🤯1
➡️1️⃣2️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ 🥳 #results #SATjizzakh #1stattempt 🎓O'quvchi: Marjona O'ralova ⌛️Tayyorlangan kursi: ( SAT INTENSIVE ) 3 oy 🎉 📈Attempt: 1️⃣ Uning fikri: SATJizzax ga kemasimdan oldin to'g'risi umuman SAT nimalaigi ham bilmasdm. To'g'ri oson bo'lmadi ammo friendlar bilan birga dars qilish, practiselar qilish orqali shunday natijaga erishdim. Teacherlarga kelsam Abdulkarim teacherni bu SAT yo'limda hissasi juda katta,…
🔥12💯4👍2🤯2⚡1🎉1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SATjizzakhLC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SAT JIZZAKH” (@SATjizzakhLC), 946 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SATjizzakhLC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.