Channel
@SEOconCanales
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,629subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001973957815 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SEOconCanales |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SEOconCanales |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 1,629 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 1,633 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 1,634 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 1,637 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 1,636 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 1,631 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 1,628 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 1,622 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 1,629 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 1,624 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 1,628 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 1,625 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:20 | 1,630 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 1,630 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
91 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 46 | 50.5% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 23.1% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 11.0% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 8.79% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎁 Regalo para la comunidad de WPCreator Lan, os paso mensaje de SEOFune y Erramun Acabamos de abrir el grupo oficial de WP Creator LAN, nuestra herramienta para gestionar todos tus WordPress desde un único panel: backups, actualizaciones, recetas, plugins, temas, comentarios, formularios… Y lo abrimos con un regalo: 3 meses gratis para los 150 primeros que lo pidan. Si ya tienes plan activo, te lo ampliamos 3 meses…
👉 Por si a alguien le interesa, dejo aquí una nueva guía explicando cómo configurar GTM en Woocommerce, este año 2026 https://sergiocanales.com/google-tag-manager-en-woocommerce/
🔥5
⚠️ ALERTA WORDPRESS: Perfmatters 2.6.4 o anterior tiene una vulnerabilidad de lectura de archivos. Puede explotarse si coinciden: ✅ Local Google Fonts activo ✅ Enlaces permanentes “bonitos” ✅ RSS Feed Links habilitados 🔒 Solución: actualizar a Perfmatters 2.6.5 o superior.
👍3❤2
😬 Vaya vaya, otro caso de virus en mi web 👉 En este caso, lo descubrí porque mi URL de acceso a WordPress daba un error crítico. ❗️¿El motivo? El archivo wp-load.php había sido modificado con código malicioso de cloaking para bots. ✅¿La solución? Eliminé ese bloque, restauré el archivo y el login volvió a funcionar. 🤦♂️Ahora toca revisar el resto de la instalación... por seguridad.
👍3
🤯 Es increíble el poder que tiene la viralización de un video 🤯 Esta semana, en el proyecto de Sibaritas.club, se nos ha viralizado un video sobre la correcta conservación del queso que nos ha traído: ✅ Compras directas en la tienda ✅ Menciones y enlaces desde sitios como ABC, LaRazón, LaRepública... ✅ Pico de tráfico y búsquedas de marca ✅ Incremento de suscriptores en la newsletter... En proyectos nuevos, como…
🔥12❤2👍1
😛 Nueva web aprobada con el magic button
🔥2❤1
👉 Si bien estos últimos meses (e incluso años) Bing ha sido mi fuente principal de tráfico, he de decir que se empieza a dar una situación similar a la de Google Search: Impresiones que suben y clics que bajan (o se mantienen estables) 👉 Revisando las SERPs he de decir que en ciertas tipologías una posición 5 casi que ni sirve de nada
❤3
👉Curso AEO de Ahrefs gratis ya en español https://ahrefs.com/es/academy/aeo-course-es
🔥5❤4
👉 Parece que Chat GPT está teniendo errores en algunos intentos de log in
💥 Otra persona que se sube al carro de las calculadoras/test 👉 Me sorprende por su perfil pero no deja de ser un nicho monetizado con otro sistema https://open.spotify.com/episode/5PwLCWyqcYywfG22sAuNlU?si=6861329916d64a77
Marca ha metido el script de Chuiso tambien
🤣5
Cada vez se curran menos los correos 🤣 Ya ni siquiera lo típico de "He visto tu blog y me encanta tu contenido..."
😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @SEOconCanales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“↗️ SEO con Canales ↗️” (@SEOconCanales), 1,629 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SEOconCanales.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.