Channel

DEAF🦈~Экскурсии~Лекции~Кино~

@SHARK1703

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,184subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002063080097
Type	Channel
Username	@SHARK1703
Created	Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	10 September 2026
Measurements held	10
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/SHARK1703

Growth

10 measurements spanning 33 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,162–1,187 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
10 Sept 2026, 11:18	1,184	+2
1 Sept 2026, 18:08	1,182	+3
30 Aug 2026, 04:47	1,179	+1
26 Aug 2026, 23:54	1,178	+2
24 Aug 2026, 09:57	1,176	+3
21 Aug 2026, 01:14	1,173	+5
18 Aug 2026, 08:11	1,168	+2
11 Aug 2026, 19:22	1,166	+1
8 Aug 2026, 21:16	1,165	-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:01	1,166	first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 8 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime: 12m 42s
Average length: 1m 25s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

284 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
🔥	111	39.1%
👍	73	25.7%
❤	50	17.6%
😍	12	4.23%
👏	10	3.52%
😱	8	2.82%
🥰	5	1.76%
👌	4	1.41%
😢	4	1.41%
❤‍🔥	2	0.704%
🤝	2	0.704%
💋	1	0.352%
😁	1	0.352%
🤔	1	0.352%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 284 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 20:29 UTC362 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Video

Дорогие подписчики и экскурсанты! «Политика в спорте» Принцип «спорт вне политики», сформулированный Пьером де Кубертеном, давно перестал работать. В современном мире спортивные состязания традиционно служат инструментом «мягкой силы», средством демонстрации государственной мощи и площадкой для геополитических или идеологических заявлений. А когда футбол стал мощным инструментом политики и площадкой для демонстрац…

🔥12😢4❤1👍1