Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 世界杯|五大联赛|足球推单

Channel

世界杯|五大联赛|足球推单

@SHCTTY

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

28,744subscribers

-15,474 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003053766793
TypeChannel
Username@SHCTTY
Description➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 永久冠名:山海财团 @SSSHHH 频道 @SHCTTTT 域名 SSSHHH.CC 🏆🏆【山海财团】🏆🏆 🏆🏆诚邀代理加入🏆🏆 🏆携手共进,扬帆起航🏆 九台|开云|爱游戏|华体会|乐鱼 米兰|星空|九 游| O D |MK ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SHCTTY

Growth

28,74444,21836,4816 August 2026 — 44,218 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,201 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,193 subscribers8 August 2026 — 44,146 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38,092 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,158 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,787 subscribers13 August 2026 — 34,757 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,562 subscribers16 August 2026 — 34,521 subscribers17 August 2026 — 34,461 subscribers18 August 2026 — 34,377 subscribers19 August 2026 — 34,339 subscribers20 August 2026 — 34,136 subscribers21 August 2026 — 33,864 subscribers22 August 2026 — 33,576 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,919 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,553 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,155 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,143 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,137 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,052 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,034 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,920 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,760 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,744 subscribers6 August 20261 September 2026
26 measurements spanning 26 days, net -15,474. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,423–46,539 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 23:5328,744-16
1 Sept 2026, 02:0528,760-160
31 Aug 2026, 04:5528,920-114
30 Aug 2026, 01:5729,034-18
28 Aug 2026, 22:4829,052-85
28 Aug 2026, 02:0529,137-6
27 Aug 2026, 01:5729,143-12
26 Aug 2026, 02:4429,155-2,398
25 Aug 2026, 04:3431,553-1,366
24 Aug 2026, 04:0532,919-657
22 Aug 2026, 13:2933,576-288
21 Aug 2026, 06:0833,864-272
20 Aug 2026, 07:0334,136-203
19 Aug 2026, 08:1834,339-38
18 Aug 2026, 11:0234,377-84
17 Aug 2026, 13:0534,461-60
16 Aug 2026, 04:0334,521-41
14 Aug 2026, 12:3634,562-195
13 Aug 2026, 04:1334,757-30
12 Aug 2026, 00:4334,787first reading

Engagement

58 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.076%
avg views ÷ 28,744 subscribers
Avg views / post
21.7
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 58 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held58 (28 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total955
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
122
Links
181

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC6 viewsread 2 September 2026

晚场⚽️精选 ————————— 英格兰冠军联赛 02:45 西布罗姆维奇 vs. 查尔顿 推荐:西布罗姆维奇 -0.5/1 ❤️ 英格兰冠军联赛 02:45 米尔沃尔 vs. 雷克斯汉姆 推荐:雷克斯汉姆 +0/0.5 英格兰冠军联赛 02:45 女王公园巡游者 vs. 卡迪夫城 推荐:女王公园巡游者 -0.5 ❤️ 英格兰冠军联赛 03:00 伯恩利 vs. 米德尔斯堡 推荐:伯恩利 +0/0.5 巴西甲级联赛 06:30 弗拉门戈 vs. 米拉索尔 推荐:米拉索尔 +2 巴西杯 08:30 桑托斯SP vs. 帕尔梅拉斯 推荐:小 2.5 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🔈【九台导航】 SSSHHH.CC 🔈【招商热线】 @SSSHHH 🔈【官方频道】 @SHCTTTT

1 Sept 2026, 12:49 UTC13 viewsread 2 September 2026

晚场⚽️精选 ————————— 沙特阿拉伯职业联赛 02:00 希拉尔 vs. 沙特阿赫利 推荐:沙特阿赫利 +1/1.5 英格兰冠军联赛 02:45 谢菲尔德联队 vs. 博尔顿 推荐:博尔顿 +1 英格兰冠军联赛 02:45 朴茨茅斯 vs. 德比郡 推荐:德比郡 +0.5 英格兰冠军联赛 02:45 斯旺西 vs. 沃特福德 推荐:斯旺西 -0.5 ❤️ 英格兰冠军联赛 02:45 西汉姆联 vs. 狼队 推荐:小 3 ❤️ 意大利杯 03:00 都灵 vs. 蒙扎 推荐:都灵 -0.5/1 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🔈【九台导航】 SSSHHH.CC 🔈【招商热线】 @SSSHHH 🔈【官方频道】 @SHCTTTT

31 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC14 viewsread 2 September 2026

晚场⚽️精选 ————————— 意大利甲级联赛 00:30 莱切 vs. 罗马 推荐:莱切 +1/1.5 西班牙甲级联赛 01:30 奥萨苏纳 vs. 赫塔菲 推荐:小 1.5/2 ❤️ 意大利甲级联赛 02:45 亚特兰大 vs. 博洛尼亚 推荐:亚特兰大 -0.5 葡萄牙超级联赛 03:15 本菲卡 vs. 埃斯托里尔 推荐:本菲卡 -2.5 葡萄牙超级联赛 03:15 布拉加 vs. 维多利亚吉马良斯 推荐:布拉加 -0.5 西班牙甲级联赛 03:30 巴塞罗那 vs. 巴列卡诺 推荐:大 4 ❤️ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🔈【九台导航】 SSSHHH.CC 🔈【招商热线】 @SSSHHH 🔈【官方频道】 @SHCTTTT

30 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC16 viewsread 2 September 2026

晚场⚽️精选 #推单 ————————— 意大利甲级联赛 00:30 那不勒斯 vs. 科莫 1907 推荐:小 2/2.5 ❤️ 荷兰甲级联赛 02:00 坎布尔 vs. 特温特 推荐:特温特 -1.5/2 意大利甲级联赛 02:45 拉齐奥 vs. 热那亚 推荐:热那亚 +0/0.5 意大利甲级联赛 02:45 卡利亚里 vs. 国际米兰 推荐:国际米兰 -1/1.5 ❤️ 法国甲级联赛 02:45 摩纳哥 vs. 马赛 推荐:小 3 巴西甲级联赛 03:00 弗拉门戈 vs. 博塔弗戈RJ 推荐:博塔弗戈RJ +1.5 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🔈【九台导航】 SSSHHH.CC 🔈【招商热线】 @SSSHHH 🔈【官方频道】 @SHCTTTT

29 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC17 viewsread 2 September 2026

晚场⚽️精选 #推单 ————————— 法国甲级联赛 23:15 斯特拉斯堡 vs. 朗斯 推荐:朗斯 -0.5 英格兰超级联赛 00:30 托特纳姆热刺 vs. 纽卡斯尔联 推荐:小 3 ❤️ 德国甲级联赛 00:30 多特蒙德 vs. 汉堡 推荐:汉堡 +1.5 西班牙甲级联赛 01:00 皇家社会 vs. 西班牙人 推荐:皇家社会 -0.5 ❤️ 意大利甲级联赛 02:45 尤文图斯 vs. 帕尔马 推荐:尤文图斯 -1.5/2 西班牙甲级联赛 03:30 塞维利亚 vs. 马德里竞技 推荐:马德里竞技 -0.5 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🔈【九台导航】 SSSHHH.CC 🔈【招商热线】 @SSSHHH 🔈【官方频道】 @SHCTTTT

28 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC16 viewsread 2 September 2026

晚场⚽️精选 #推单 ————————— 德国乙级联赛 00:30 布伦瑞克 vs. 柏林赫塔 推荐:布伦瑞克 +0/0.5 德国甲级联赛 02:30 拜仁慕尼黑 vs. 斯图加特 推荐:斯图加特 +2/2.5 法国甲级联赛 02:45 里尔 vs. 巴黎圣日耳曼 推荐:巴黎圣日耳曼 -0.5/1 英格兰超级联赛 03:00 水晶宫 vs. 曼彻斯特城 推荐:曼彻斯特城 -0.5/1 ❤️ 葡萄牙超级联赛 03:15 里奥阿维 vs. 葡萄牙体育 推荐:葡萄牙体育 -1.5 ❤️ 西班牙甲级联赛 03:30 阿拉维斯 vs. 比利亚雷亚尔 推荐:比利亚雷亚尔 -0/0.5 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🔈【九台导航】 SSSHHH.CC 🔈【招商热线】 @SSSHHH 🔈【官方频道】 @SHCTTTT

27 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC13 viewsread 2 September 2026

晚场⚽️精选 #推单 ————————— 西班牙甲级联赛 03:00 巴塞罗那 VS 毕尔巴鄂竞技 推荐:毕尔巴鄂竞技 +2 西班牙甲级联赛 02:30 塞尔塔 VS 奥萨苏纳 推荐:奥萨苏纳 +0.5 ❤️ 欧洲联赛资格赛 - 附加赛 02:30:00 安德莱赫特 VS 海拉提 推荐:大 2.5/3 欧洲联赛资格赛 - 附加赛 02:30 费伦茨瓦罗斯 VS 特拉布宗体育 推荐:费伦茨瓦罗斯 +0/0.5 欧洲联赛资格赛 - 附加赛 02:00 奥胡斯 VS 本菲卡 推荐:大 3/3.5 ❤️ 欧洲联赛资格赛 - 附加赛 01:00 萨尔茨堡红牛 VS 米亚尔比 推荐:大 3/3.5 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🔈【九台导航】 SSSHHH.CC 🔈【招商热线】 @SSSHHH 🔈【官方频道】 @SHCTTTT

26 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC18 viewsread 2 September 2026

晚场⚽️精选 #推单 ————————— 英格兰联赛杯 普雷斯顿VS埃弗顿 推荐:普雷斯顿+1/1.5 ❤️ 巴西杯 帕尔梅拉斯SP VS 桑托斯SP 推荐:桑托斯SP +1 西班牙甲级联赛 皇家马德里VS 皇家社会 推荐:皇家社会+2 欧洲冠军联赛资格赛﹣附加赛 里昂VS 费内巴切 推荐:大2.5/3 ❤️ 欧洲冠军联赛资格赛﹣附加赛 佩利根VS 布拉迪斯拉发 推荐:布拉迪斯拉发+0/0.5 英格兰联赛杯 纽卡斯尔联VS西布罗姆维奇 推荐:纽卡斯尔联﹣1/1.5 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🔈【九台导航】 SSSHHH.CC 🔈【招商热线】 @SSSHHH 🔈【官方频道】 @SHCTTTT

25 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC19 viewsread 2 September 2026

晚场⚽️精选 #推单 ————————— 英格兰联赛杯 2:45 斯托克城VS 赫尔城 推荐:斯托克城0 西班牙甲级联赛 3:00 瓦伦西亚VS皇家贝蒂斯 推荐:大2/2.5 英格兰联赛杯 3:00 伯明翰 VS 布伦特福德 推荐:伯明翰 +0.5/1 英格兰联赛杯 3:00 诺丁汉森林VS利兹联 推荐:利兹联 +0/0.5 欧洲冠军联赛资格赛 - 附加赛 3:00 博多格林特VS奈梅亨 推荐:博多格林特 -1/1.5 欧洲冠军联赛资格赛 - 附加赛 3:00 林茨VS 凯尔特人 推荐:凯尔特人 +0.5 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🔈【九台导航】 SSSHHH.CC 🔈【招商热线】 @SSSHHH 🔈【官方频道】 @SHCTTTT

Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @SHCTTY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 60,636 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

ssshhh.cc11 posts · 28 July 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“世界杯|五大联赛|足球推单” (@SHCTTY), 28,744 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SHCTTY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.